Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions for Addictive Behaviors

April 17, 2024 updated by: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Background:

Many smartphone apps intend to help people with addictions. But not enough is known about how they should work. Researchers want to study an app that gives people the advice they need, just when they need it. This is a JITAI. It stands for Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention. To create a good JITAI, researchers need to know what approaches work best at different moments.

Objective:

To develop ways to treat addiction with a smartphone app.

Eligibility:

Adults ages 18-75 who use heroin or other opioids

Design:

Participants will be screened in another protocol.

Participants will visit a Baltimore clinic 3 days a week to give urine and breath samples.

Some participants will get their treatment at this clinic.

Participants will answer questions about their personality and stress.

Participants will randomly be assigned to the JITAI group or a comparison group.

Participants will have a training session on using the smartphone app. JITAI participants will also watch a video about the written messages they ll see in the app.

Weeks 3-10: participants will carry a smartphone. Four times a day, it will beep and ask questions. These will be about the participant s activities and mood. The JITAI group will see a short message after. The message is meant to be helpful.

For the first 16 evenings, JITAI participants will get more information on the phone.

Answers to the app s questions will be transferred automatically from the smartphone to secure computers at the NIH.

During the last week, participants can choose the kind of messages they see.

Week 11: participants will return the smartphone and answer questions.

Weeks 12-16, participants who are getting their medicine from the research clinic will be encouraged to transfer to other clinics. Otherwise, they will have their dose slowly reduced to zero.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Our research group has made extensive use of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to understand people s daily experiences with opioid craving, use, and lapse. We have also administered clinic-based psychotherapies such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), in which clients learn to avoid, escape, resolve, or reframe problems (such as stress) that can trigger lapses to drug use. CBT contrasts with ACT (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy), a mindfulness-based approach in which difficult thoughts and feelings are viewed as necessary and potentially valuable components of a full life, to be experienced observantly rather than resolved or reframed. CBT and ACT can and do coexist in a single treatment plan, but we know of no systematic attempt to reconcile their differences. We have also not tried to administer either of them on a mobile device.

OBJECTIVE: To test a just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI)-a treatment given when and where it is needed. Our JITAI will be delivered via smartphone app and will combine elements of two widely used treatments for addiction: CBT and ACT. Our goal is not to bring another branded app onto the market, but rather to clarify when and for whom the generic components of such apps are effective or not. This will include determining when CBT is more helpful than ACT and vice versa.

PARTICIPANT POPULATION: Outpatient adults who are physically dependent on opioids -up to 185 enrolled (35 for a formative-interview phase, 150 for a trial) for a target of 115 evaluable (30 interviewees, 85 trial participants). Target enrollment will include 40% women and 60% minorities (mostly African-American). In the trial, some participants will receive buprenorphine in our clinic, and others will be receiving buprenorphine or methadone elsewhere; this is a procedural matter, not a component of the experimental design.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: After a formative-interview phase, the study will be run as a microrandomized trial that will also include a conventionally randomized between-groups clinical-trial component. In microrandomization, interventions are randomized at the momentary level within person; the effect is measured proximally (e.g., 20 minutes later). This is a powerful way to assess the effects of different interventions administered in the field and to examine strategy-situation fit, i.e., whether interventions are differentially effective under specific momentary circumstances. We are powering our study mostly to detect (1) any effect of CBT or ACT versus control moments with no intervention given, and (2) preferential advantages of CBT over ACT, and vice versa, as a function of the participant s ability to control (change, escape) a given situation. The between-groups aspect of the design (JITAI group versus EMA-only control group) is needed to demonstrate an effect of our JITAI on traditional, distal measures of outcome, such as reductions in opioid use.

METHODS: In the formative-interview phase, we will conduct interviews with people in treatment for OUD who express interest in using a mobile treatment app. We will ask them

about day-to-day challenges they currently face in maintaining progress toward their treatment goals, and ask them what might be helpful. Then we will show them item lists, onscreen mockups, and/or functional demos, and we will ask interviewees to comment on the app s likely usefulness, its likely pitfalls, and how we could improve it.

In the clinical trial, participants will be randomized to one of two groups (JITAI vs. EMA-only control). During weeks 1-2, all participants will have baseline assessments of coping styles and personality, and all JITAI participants will be shown a video introducing basic concepts of CBT and ACT. For weeks 3-10 (8 weeks), participants will carry smartphones for EMA with or without JITAI. During week 11, participants will be readministered some of the assessments from baseline. Participants receiving buprenorphine from us will then be offered a dose taper or encouraged to transfer to continued treatment elsewhere. All participants will come to our clinic thrice weekly for urine testing throughout participation.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Proximal effects of CBT and ACT messages in the JITAI group: decreases over 20-minute intervals in craving and negative mood, with increases in self-efficacy; (2) strategy-situation fit in the JITAI group; (3) group differences in distal effects of treatment (week 11 versus week 2) in terms of self-efficacy and coping flexibility.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Trait predictors of differential responses to CBT and ACT, in the JITAI group; (2) group differences in frequency of opioid-positive urine over time; (3) time courses of responsiveness to ACT vs. CBT, in the JITAI group; (4) whether the intervention types that benefit participants most when pushed by the app are the same ones participants choose when subsequently given the opportunity to pull interventions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

185

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Recruiting
        • National Institute on Drug Abuse
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Phase 1: Formative interviews.

The enrollment ceiling is 35 outpatients (to collect evaluable data from 30) who meet these criteria: (1) Age 18-75; (2) physical dependence on opioids (by self-report); (3) interest in receiving the types of treatment about which we will be conducting interviews.

Phase 2: Clinical trial with microrandomization.

The enrollment ceiling is 150 outpatients (to collect evaluable data from 85, of whom 50 will be randomized to JITAI, and 35 to EMA control). Treatment may be provided by us in the form of office-based buprenorphine treatment (OBOT) or may be provided elsewhere (Treatment Elsewhere, TE). Participants must meet these criteria:

OBOT participants: (1) Age 18-75; (2) physical dependence on opioids (by positive urine and/or frank opioid withdrawal); (3) interest in receiving the types of treatment we are testing.

Treatment Elsewhere (TE) participants: (1) Age 18-75; (2) receiving methadone or buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence from a qualified provider in the community; (3) interest in receiving the types of treatment we are testing.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Phase 1: Formative interviews. (1) cognitive impairment severe enough to preclude informed consent or valid interview responses.

Phase 2: Clinical trial with microrandomization.

OBOT participants: (1) History of any DSM-V psychotic disorder; history of bipolar disorder; current Major Depressive Disorder; (2) unresolved symptoms of PTSD that, in the investigators view, would make it risky for the participant to undertake mindfulness exercises (e.g., observing all one s current negative thoughts and emotions) in an unsupervised setting; (3) current dependence on alcohol or sedative-hypnotic, e.g. benzodiazepine (by DSM-V criteria); (4) cognitive impairment severe enough to preclude informed consent or valid self-report; (5) Any condition that interferes with urine collection; (6) medical illness (e.g., cirrhosis, nephritic syndrome, thyroid disease, ischemic heart disease, epilepsy, adrenal insufficiency, etc.) or medications that, in the view of the investigators, would compromise participation in research.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: EMA only
randomized control group undergoing mobile assessment without JITAI
Placebo
No Intervention: Formative Interviews
First stage, before content of mobile intervention is finalized
Active Comparator: JITAI
group receiving microrandomized active intervention: JITAI with both CBT and ACT
Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention delivered via smartphone app

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proximal effects of CBT and ACT messages in a JITAI
Time Frame: 20 minutes
momentary effects of CBT and ACT
20 minutes
Distal effects of JITAI on self-efficacy and coping flexibility
Time Frame: 9 weeks
between-group differences in treatment response
9 weeks
Differential responses over time
Time Frame: end of study
CBT messages will be rated as helpful almost immediately; ACT messages may have to be lived with for several weeks, but may also stand up better to repetition
end of study
Strategy-situation fit
Time Frame: 20 minutes
differential momentary effects of CBT and ACT
20 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trait predictors of responsiveness
Time Frame: end of study
we will examine whether trait variables such as personality and preferred coping styles are associated with differential responsiveness to CBT-based versus ACT-based messages
end of study
push versus pull
Time Frame: end of study
we will also assess, but have no directional predictions about, whether the intervention types that seem to benefit participants most when pushed by the app are the same ones that participants choose when subsequently given the opportunity to pull interventions
end of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David H Epstein, Ph.D., National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

Last Verified

November 14, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 999918095
  • 18-DA-N095

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Addiction

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe