Effects of Epalrestat on Peripheral Neuropathy and Central Nervous System in Diabetic Patients

Effects of Epalrestat on Peripheral Neuropathy and Central Nervous System in Diabetic Patient

This study evaluated the efficacy of epalrestat in diabetic peripheral neuropathy and its effects on the central nervous system in diabetic peripheral neuropathy subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

72

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410008
        • Recruiting
        • Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 18 to 65 years (to the date of screening);
  2. A clear history of type 2 diabetes (using the 1999 WHO diabetes diagnostic criteria) with a course of disease > 6 months;
  3. HbA1c < 7%;
  4. Two or more of the following five tests are abnormal: abnormal temperature perception; Nylon wire for hypoesthesia or disappearance of the foot; Abnormal vibration sense; Ankle reflex disappeared; Two or more nerve conduction velocities were reduced;
  5. Have not used mecobalamin, epalrestat, lipoic acid or high-dose glucocorticoid in the recent (3 months) period, or have not been involved in other treatment of the same disease within 3 months prior to the study;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Neuropathy caused by other causes, such as cervical and lumbar lesions, cerebral infarction, etc.;
  2. With acute metabolic complications of diabetes, such as ketoacidosis, lactic acidosis, diabetes hyperotonic state, etc;
  3. Severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases , pulmonary heart disease or pulmonary insufficiency, renal failure, severe dyslipidemia, poorly controlled hypertension, severe hepatitis.
  4. Those with a history of malignant tumor or wasting diseases such as tuberculosis;
  5. Contraindications to MRI scanning: such as internal (especially oral) metal implants, claustrophobia, etc;
  6. Poor compliance or serious side effects;
  7. pregnant female.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Epalrestat
oral epalrestat (50mg/ time, 3 times/day) + conventional hypoglycemia + oral mecobalamin (0.5mg/ time, 3 times/day) for half a year
Epalrestat will be taken orally at a dose of 50mg 3 times a day before meals. In addition, conventional hypoglycemic and oral mecobalamin treatment 0.5mg/ time, 3 times/day, before meals.
Experimental: The control group
conventional hypoglycemia + oral mecobalamin (0.5mg/ time, 3 times/day) for half a year
Subjects takes mecobalamin 0.5mg orally, 3 times a day.Regular hypoglycemia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change of resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
The change in grey matter volume,white matter area, local gyrification index after 6-months treatment
baseline , 6months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change of electromyography
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
mean change from baseline in nerve conduction velocity(m/s) after 6-months treatment
baseline , 6months
Mean change of quantitative somatosensory testing
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
Mean change of temperature perception threshold(℃) after 6-months treatment
baseline , 6months
Mean change of corneal confocal focus
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
Mean change of nerve fibre density(no./mm2) after 6-months treatment
baseline , 6months
Mean change in HbA1c
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
Mean change of HbA1c(%) after 6-months treatment
baseline , 6months
Change of Self-Rating Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
Mean change of Self-Rating Anxiety Scale score after 6-months treatment score.The minimum and maximum values is 25 and 100, which higher scores mean more anxiety.
baseline , 6months
Change of Self-Rating Depression Scale
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
Mean change of Self-Rating Depression Scale score after 6-months treatment.The minimum and maximum values is 25 and 100, which higher scores mean more depression.
baseline , 6months
Mean change of Toronto clinical scoring system
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
Mean change of Toronto clinical scoring system score after 6-months treatment.The minimum and maximum values is 0 and 19, which higher scores mean more severe neuropathy.
baseline , 6months
Mean change of Neuropathic pain scale
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
Mean change of Neuropathic pain scale score after 6-months treatment.The minimum and maximum values is 0 and 10, which higher scores mean more severe neuropathy.
baseline , 6months
Mean change of Michigan neuropathy screening form
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
Mean change of Michigan neuropathy screening form score after 6-months treatment.The minimum and maximum values is 0 and 23, which higher scores mean more severe neuropathy.
baseline , 6months
Mean change of mini-mental state examination
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
Mean change of mini-mental state examination score after 6-months treatment.The minimum and maximum values is 0 and 30, which lower scores mean more severe cognitive dysfunction.
baseline , 6months
Mean change of Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: baseline , 6months
Mean change of Montreal Cognitive Assessment score after 6-months treatment.The minimum and maximum values is 0 and 30, which lower scores mean more severe cognitive dysfunction.
baseline , 6months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Epalrestat,Mecobalamin

3
Subscribe