Development of Dysphagia Evaluation Via Video Analysis Based on Deep Learning Method in Neonates and Infants and Correlation Between the Evaluation and the Development

January 21, 2022 updated by: Hong Garam, Asan Medical Center
The purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation of dysphagia through deep learning-based video analysis in newborns and infants, and to report the correlation with future development.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Although the exact frequency of dysphagia in newborns is not known, according to a paper published by Motion et al. in 2001, the prevalence of eating problems in premature infants under 37 weeks of age was 10.5%, and in 2001, Mercado-Deane et al. reported that about 26% had dysphagia. In 1996, Reilly et al. reported that more than 90% of children with polio had oral movement disorders and 38% had dysphagia. It is known that the frequency of dysphagia in newborns and infants is not low. The risk factors that cause these dysphagia are very diverse, and dysphagia in children can be induced by causes that can affect the whole process of swallowing.

The evaluation of dysphagia can be divided into an evaluation method that does not use an instrument such as SOMA, SDS, and quality of life measurement, and an evaluation method that uses an instrument such as VFSS and FEES. However, it is difficult to conduct tests such as VFSS in newborns and infants due to poor coordination, and there is also a risk of radiation exposure. In addition, there are practical difficulties in applying the evaluation in all medical institutions because special facilities are required to implement VFSS and specialized clinical personnel are required.

The Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS), developed by Marjorie Meyer Palmer in 1983, is an evaluation method for dysphagia applicable to infants under 48 weeks of PMA that evaluates whether there are abnormal findings by observing sucking for 5 minutes. However, NOMAS has the disadvantage that a person has to directly observe the sucking and may show differences in results between raters.

Therefore, in this study, inspired by the evaluation method of NOMAS, investigators try to develop an evaluation method to evaluate swallowing disorders by videotaping bottle feeding in newborns and infants, then calculating and analyzing the features of the baby's face related to swallowing with artificial intelligence. investigators would like to analyze the relationship between this evaluation result and future development.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Garam Hong, M.D.
  • Phone Number: 02-3010-0769 010-9146-7738
  • Email: eamsmed@gmail.com

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05505
        • Recruiting
        • Asan Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Phone Number: 1688-7575

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 6 months (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newborns and infants under 6 months of correctional age
  • Clinically suspected to have dysphagia
  • In case parental consent is obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In case of cardiopulmonary instability (ECMO, Ventilator, etc. are being applied)
  • When it is not possible to secure sufficient fields for artificial intelligence analysis of images due to factors such as anatomical abnormalities of the head and neck

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Infant with suspected dysphagia
For newborns and infants who satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria, after taking a video of a bottle feeding, we try to develop an evaluation of swallowing disorder through artificial intelligence-based analysis. The developed evaluation will be verified for validity by comparing it with NOMAS (and VFSS if possible), and the correlation with future development will be analyzed through the relationship with the 1st and 2nd year correctional Bailey Developmental Evaluation.
  1. Bottle feeding filming

    - With a camera that can measure depth, take a video of feeding milk from a bottle for 5-10 minutes.

  2. NOMAS (Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale) evaluation

    • Evaluate NOMAS with bottle feeding video by certified evaluators.
    • NOMAS, developed by Marjorie Meyer Palmer in 1983, is an evaluation method for dysphagia applicable to infants under 48 weeks of PMA.
  3. Implementation of video analysis using deep learning (A) Analysis method - Implement a deep learning network that sets keypoints of faces and environments related to swallowing and detects specified keypoints in units of frames.

(B) Analyze the movement of key points, and figure out the correlation between swallowing states.

(C) Create an input/output process that can automatically classify swallowing states with video as input.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between NOMAS evaluation and AI analysis of dysphagia
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Correlation between NOMAS evaluation and AI analysis of dysphagia
up to 2 years
Correlation between VFSS evaluation and AI analysis of dysphagia
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Correlation between VFSS evaluation and AI analysis of dysphagia
up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between AI analysis of dysphagia and development
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Correlation between AI analysis of dysphagia and development
up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 2, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysphagia of Newborn

Clinical Trials on AI analysis

3
Subscribe