Drug-Coated Balloon in Patients With High Bleeding Risk (DCB-HBR)

February 20, 2024 updated by: Joo Myung Lee, Samsung Medical Center

Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent for Treatment of De-Novo Coronary Lesions in Patients With High Bleeding Risk (DCB-HBR Trial)

DCB-HBR trial is prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial.

The aim of the study is to compare clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon (DCB) with drug-eluting stent (DES) for treatment of de-novo coronary lesion under intravascular imaging-guided optimization in patients with high bleeding risk (HBR).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) is the standard of care for patients with coronary artery disease who are deemed eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite many advantages, DES inevitably accompanies disadvantages such as the occurrence of late stent thrombosis and the need for maintaining dual antiplatelet (DAPT) for certain period due to permanent vascular implant, which leads to both increased ischemic and bleeding events.

As an alternative to DES, drug-coated balloon (DCB), a novel treatment strategy, which has benefit of having shorter DAPT maintenance duration due to the absence of scaffolds and polymers, has been introduced. Based on meta-analysis based on many randomized clinical trials (RCT), its use has been established in in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents (BMS) and DES. Furthermore, recently published RCTs demonstrated efficacy and safety of DCB in de-novo coronary lesions in small vessels. However, studies exploring the feasibility of DCB in de-novo coronary lesions are limited. In particular, there are scarce data comparing DCB with DES in patients with high bleeding risk (HBR), a situation in which long-term maintenance of DAPT is a clinical dilemma. In the previous two RCTs, DCB showed noninferiority to DES in lesions in large vessels. Nevertheless, these studies were conducted in non-HBR patients and the number of participated patients was insufficient. In another RCT, only patients with HBR were included, but the efficacy of DCB was compared with BMS not DES.

Recently, studies have proved short term (1-3 months) DAPT has comparable efficacy to longer DAPT in HBR patients using latest second-generation DES. On this background, this trial aims to compare clinical outcomes between DCB and DES in de-novo coronary lesions in large vessels in patients with HBR receiving short term DAPT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1350

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Ansan, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Korea University Ansan Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sunwon Kim, MD, PhD
      • Cheongju, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Chungbuk National University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jang-Whan Bae, MD, PhD
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hyuck-Jun Yoon, MD, PhD
      • Gangneung, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hanbit Park, MD, PhD
      • Gwangju, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Chonnam National University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Seung Hun Lee, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Young Joon Hong, MD, PhD
      • Gwangmyeong, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sang Yeub Lee, MD, PhD
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Inha University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sang Don Park, MD, PhD
      • Jinju, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Gyeongsang National University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hangyul Kim, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jin-Sin Koh, MD, PhD
      • Seongnam-si, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ki-Hyun Jeon, MD, PhD
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Samsung Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joo Myung Lee, MD, MPH, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ki Hong Choi, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Taek Kyu Park, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jeong Hoon Yang, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Young Bin Song, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Joo-Yong Hahn, MD, PhD
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eun Ho Choo, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kwan Yong Lee, MD, PhD
      • Uijeongbu, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Seonghyeon Bu, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chan Joon Kim, MD, PhD
      • Wonju, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sung Gyun Ahn, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject must be at least 19 years of age
  2. Subject who is able to understand risks, benefits and treatment alternatives and sign informed consent voluntarily.
  3. Patients with at least one lesion with greater than 50% diameter stenosis or fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 requiring revascularization in de-novo coronary artery of reference vessel size ≥2.25 mm
  4. Patients with high bleeding risk: one or more of the criteria listed (1) Adjunctive oral anticoagulation treatment planned to continue after PCI (2) Age ≥ 75 years old (3) Baseline Hemoglobin <11 g/dl (or anemia requiring transfusion during the 4 weeks prior to randomization) (4) Any prior intra-cerebral bleed (5) Stroke at any time or transient ischemic attack in the previous 6 months. (6) Hospital admission for bleeding during the prior 12 months (7) Non skin cancer diagnosed or treated < 3 years (8) Planned daily NSAID (other than aspirin) or steroids for >30 days after PCI (9) Planned surgery that would require interruption of DAPT (within next 12 months) (10) Renal failure defined as calculated creatinine clearance <40 ml/min or on dialysis (11) Hematological disorders (platelet count <100,000/mm3 or any coagulation disorder) (12) Severe chronic liver disease defined as patients who have developed any of the following: variceal hemorrhage, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy or jaundice (13) Expected non-compliance to prolonged DAPT for other medical reasons

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients unable to provide consent
  2. Patients with known intolerance to aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, or components of drug-eluting stents
  3. Patients with angiographic findings of (1) Left main coronary artery disease (2) In-stent restenosis is the cause of target lesion (3) Target lesion in bypass graft (4) True bifurcation lesion that requires upfront 2-stenting
  4. Patients who have non-cardiac co-morbid conditions with life expectancy <2 year
  5. Patients who may result in protocol non-compliance (site investigator's medical judgment)
  6. Patients with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest
  7. Patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <30%)
  8. Patients with severe valvular heart disease requiring open heart surgery
  9. Pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: DES group

Patients will be randomized to either the DCB group or the DES group with 1:1 ratio during the index procedure after diagnostic angiography.

In DES group, latest second-generation DES will be used (Ultimaster Tansei) during the index procedure

1:1 randomization to DES (Ultimaster Tansei) or DCB (Agent [Boston Scientific, USA], Prevail [Medtronic, USA], or SeQuent Please, SeQuent Please NEO [B-Braun, Germany])
Experimental: DCB group

Patients will be randomized to either the DCB group or the DES group with 1:1 ratio during the index procedure after diagnostic angiography.

In DCB group, Agent (Boston Scientific, USA), Prevail (Medtronic, USA), or SeQuent Please, SeQuent Please NEO (B-Braun, Germany) will be used during the index procedure.

1:1 randomization to DES (Ultimaster Tansei) or DCB (Agent [Boston Scientific, USA], Prevail [Medtronic, USA], or SeQuent Please, SeQuent Please NEO [B-Braun, Germany])

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Target vessel failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
a composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization (TVR)
2 years from last patient enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiovascular death
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
Cardiovascular death
2 years from last patient enrollment
All-cause death
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
All-cause death
2 years from last patient enrollment
Target-vessel MI
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
Target-vessel MI
2 years from last patient enrollment
Non-fatal MI
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
Non-fatal MI
2 years from last patient enrollment
Clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
Clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization (TLR)
2 years from last patient enrollment
Clinically indicated TVR
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
Clinically indicated TVR
2 years from last patient enrollment
Any revascularization
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
Any revascularization
2 years from last patient enrollment
Vessel or stent thrombosis
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
definite or probable by Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition
2 years from last patient enrollment
Cardiovascular death or target-vessel MI
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
Cardiovascular death or target-vessel MI
2 years from last patient enrollment
All-cause death or non-fatal MI
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
All-cause death or non-fatal MI
2 years from last patient enrollment
Target lesion failure (TLF)
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
a composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel MI, and clinically indicated TLR
2 years from last patient enrollment
Cardiovascular death, target-vessel MI, or vessel or stent thrombosis
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
Cardiovascular death, target-vessel MI, or vessel or stent thrombosis
2 years from last patient enrollment
All-cause death, non-fatal MI, or TVR
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
All-cause death, non-fatal MI, or TVR
2 years from last patient enrollment
Major bleeding (Major secondary endpoint)
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding
2 years from last patient enrollment
Major bleeding
Time Frame: 2 years from last patient enrollment
The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding
2 years from last patient enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After publication of first manuscript and trial results, the de-identified data will be shared by permission of principle investigator, when asked

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication of first manuscript and trial results, the de-identified data will be shared by permission of principle investigator, when asked

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

After publication of first manuscript and trial results, the de-identified data will be shared by permission of principle investigator, when asked

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous coronary intervention

3
Subscribe