- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05252182
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the Emergency Department
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the Emergency Department: a Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical and Process Outcomes
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The significant growth in ED attendances is a growing public health issue, with attendances by older adults accelerating over the past decade, beyond that due to population ageing alone. The reasons underlying older adults higher rate of healthcare utilisation, specifically ED usage, are multifaceted. However, the most potent intrinsic factor is the clinical condition of frailty. The presence of diminished homeostatic reserves leaves older adults more susceptible to acute exacerbations of comorbid and long-term conditions, which result in a concomitant increased demand for emergency care.
A presentation to an ED can be viewed as a sentinel event for an older adult. Conversely, it affords clinicians an opportunity to identify a high risk cohort followed by delivery of a holistic and bio-psychosocial intervention to mitigate against suboptimal outcomes. CGA is considered the gold standard approach to improving a range of outcomes for frail older adults in acute hospitals. Research has demonstrated that it is feasible to embed CGA within the ED and a model of care delivered by interdisciplinary teams incorporating geriatric competencies into their service has been recommended to meet the emergency and urgent care needs of this patient population within the ED. Despite this recommendation, there is no compelling evidence that ED-CGAs are clinically effective at improving clinical and process outcomes.
An ED based interdisciplinary team aim to improve the quality of care and outcomes of older adults through delivery of a CGA. CGA is an intensive interdisciplinary intervention, which assesses an older adult in a holistic fashion incorporating medical, functional, physical and psychological process of care. The team compromises a senior registrar in Geriatric Medicine, specialist geriatric nurse, senior occupational therapist, senior physiotherapist, and senior medical social worker. The investigators propose to explore the clinical and process outcomes of older adults who receive an interdisciplinary ED-CGA over a period of six months after their initial ED attendance through the conduct of a prospective cohort study.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Munster
-
Limerick, Munster, Ireland
- University of Limerick
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged ≥ 65 years;
- Identification of Seniors at Risk score of ≥ 2;
- Manchester Triage System category of 2 to 5;
- Presenting with a medical complaint.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Older adults who are deemed not to have capacity to provide informed consent;
- Older adults who present to the ED outside of the operational working hours (Monday-Friday, 08:00-16:00) of the interdisciplinary ED-CGA team;
- Older adults presenting with acute cardiac and/or neurological pathology;
- Older adults presenting with injuries that require surgical intervention;
- Older adults presenting with high illness acuity, which necessitates treatment in the resuscitation room for the duration of their ED stay.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Incidence of hospital admission from the ED index attendance.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of participants who are admitted to hospital following their index ED attendance
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Incidence of functional decline (including functional decline at discharge from hospital among the cohort admitted from the ED).
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
|
Functional decline is defined as a net decrease in the number of activities of daily living performed independently as measured by the self-reported Barthel Index.
The sum score of all subscales may range from 0-20 points, where 0 indicates the maximum level of dependency and 20 indicates maximum independence.
|
30 days and 6 months
|
Patient satisfaction with the ED index attendance
Time Frame: 30-day follow-up
|
Participants will rate their satisfaction across a number of domains using the 18-item Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire.
The sum score of all subscales may range from 18 to 90 points, where 18 points is the poorest possible evaluation and 90 points the best.
|
30-day follow-up
|
Number of unscheduled ED re-attendances
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
|
Number of participants who experienced an unscheduled ED re-attendance following their index attendance
|
30 days and 6 months
|
Number of unscheduled hospital admissions
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
|
Number of participants who experienced an unscheduled hospital (re)admission following their ED index attendance
|
30 days and 6 months
|
Nursing home admission
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
|
Number of participants who were admitted to a nursing home or residential care facility following their ED index attendance
|
30 days and 6 months
|
Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
|
Number of participants who died following their ED index attendance
|
30 days and 6 months
|
Healthcare utilisation
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
|
Number and duration of services that participants were in receipt of following ED index attendance e.g.
specialist geriatric ambulatory care hub attendances, GP visits, public health nurse visits, home care support, outpatient clinic attendance, health and social care professionals input etc.
|
30 days and 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Íde O'Shaughnessy, MSc, University of Limerick
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. Epub 2013 Feb 8. Erratum In: Lancet. 2013 Oct 19;382(9901):1328.
- MAHONEY FI, BARTHEL DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5. No abstract available.
- Ellis G, Gardner M, Tsiachristas A, Langhorne P, Burke O, Harwood RH, Conroy SP, Kircher T, Somme D, Saltvedt I, Wald H, O'Neill D, Robinson D, Shepperd S. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD006211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub3.
- Mackway-Jones K ed: Emergency triage. London: BMJ Publishing Group. 1997.
- Marshall GN, Hays RD: The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18). Santa Monica, CA: Rand; 1994.
- Conroy SP, Turpin S. New horizons: urgent care for older people with frailty. Age Ageing. 2016 Sep;45(5):577-84. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw135. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
- Morley C, Unwin M, Peterson GM, Stankovich J, Kinsman L. Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203316. eCollection 2018.
- Lowthian JA, McGinnes RA, Brand CA, Barker AL, Cameron PA. Discharging older patients from the emergency department effectively: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2015 Sep;44(5):761-70. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv102. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
- Sanders AB, Witzke D, Jones JS, et al.: Principles of care and application of the geriatric emergency care model. In: Sanders AB, ed. Emergency Care of the Elder Person. St Louis: Beverly Cracom Publications, 1996; 59-93.
- Vermeiren S, Vella-Azzopardi R, Beckwee D, Habbig AK, Scafoglieri A, Jansen B, Bautmans I; Gerontopole Brussels Study group. Frailty and the Prediction of Negative Health Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):1163.e1-1163.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.010.
- Conroy SP, Stevens T, Parker SG, Gladman JR. A systematic review of comprehensive geriatric assessment to improve outcomes for frail older people being rapidly discharged from acute hospital: 'interface geriatrics'. Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):436-43. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr060. Epub 2011 May 26.
- Conroy SP, Ansari K, Williams M, Laithwaite E, Teasdale B, Dawson J, Mason S, Banerjee J. A controlled evaluation of comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department: the 'Emergency Frailty Unit'. Age Ageing. 2014 Jan;43(1):109-14. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft087. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
- Harding S. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department. Age Ageing. 2020 Oct 23;49(6):936-938. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa059.
- O'Shaughnessy I, Robinson K, O'Connor M, Conneely M, Steed F, Ryan D, Carey L, Shchetkovsky D, Shanahan E, Leahy A, Quinn C, Sheikhi A, Galvin R. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department: A protocol for a prospective cohort study. HRB Open Res. 2022 Sep 14;5:26. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13504.2. eCollection 2022.
- McCusker J, Bellavance F, Cardin S, Trepanier S, Verdon J, Ardman O. Detection of older people at increased risk of adverse health outcomes after an emergency visit: the ISAR screening tool. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Oct;47(10):1229-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb05204.x.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ED-CGA
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Frailty
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
-
Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores...Not yet recruiting
-
Longeveron Inc.CompletedAging FrailtyUnited States
-
Longeveron Inc.CompletedAging FrailtyUnited States
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityCompleted
-
Xijing HospitalUnknownFrailty SyndromeChina
-
Region ZealandUniversity of Southern DenmarkActive, not recruitingFrailty SyndromeDenmark
-
Neurological Associates of West Los AngelesEnrolling by invitation
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliCompleted