Interest of the Virtual Reality as an Analgesic Support and in the Management the Pre-procedural Anxiety in Rheumatology (REAVIR)

June 30, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier le Mans
As a part of the current rheumatological practice skills, epidural injections through the sacrococcygeal hiatus take part in the strategy for managing radicular diseases. This technical act is easily performed in an outpatient context since it is a brief procedure, performed under clinical and ultrasound control, with good tolerance. Nevertheless, epidural injections by the way of the sacrococcygeal hiatus can be responsible of anxiety for the patient and meet the definition of pain induced by treatment. Among the non-pharmacological methods that can be offered to the patient in this context, hypnosis and distraction allow psycho-corporal support acting on certain factors influencing the painful experience of the gesture: duration of the gesture, calm and pleasant environment, etc... That is the context in which the use of virtual reality is of interest. Its use in supporting procedures generating induced pain has already been evaluated in several studies, in particular in the fields of surgery and anaesthesiology. The use of a virtual reality device also seems suitable in the context of epidural injections, but this theoretical and plausible interest remains to be demonstrated. To our knowledge, the literature on the use of a virtual reality headset to support invasive procedures in rheumatology remains poorly developed. The objective of this study is therefore to assess the interest of using a virtual reality headset in the support of pain relief and the management of peri-procedural anxiety when performing epidural injections through the sacrococcygeal hiatus.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Le Mans, France, 72000
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier du Mans
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Amélie DENIS, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient (age ≥ 18 years)
  • Hospitalized in a day-hospitalization department at the General Hospital of Le Mans
  • For whom a diagnosis of radiculalgia with a duration of less than 6 months is made, for which the imaging is compatible with the symptoms according to the clinician's interpretation
  • For whom the indication of at least 2 epidural injections by the way of the sacrococcygeal hiatus is retained
  • Having never experienced an epidural injection through the sacrococcygeal hiatus
  • Patient able and willing to answer the auto-administered surveys
  • Person affiliated or beneficiary of a social security
  • Free, informed and written consent signed by the participant and the investigator (at the latest on the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research) after oral and written information

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with comorbidity of epilepsy
  • Patient with a contraindication to performing epidural injections through the sacrococcygeal hiatus
  • Patient suffering from blindness and / or deafness
  • Person with a known significant intolerance towards the use of screens and / or virtual reality devices
  • Patient receiving benzodiazepines and / or other sedative treatment
  • Patient with a known depressive disease followed by a psychiatrist
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding or parturient woman
  • Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Person under forced psychiatric care
  • Person subject to legal protection
  • Person unable to express consent
  • Patient who had participated in an interventional study during the last 30 days
  • Severely impaired physical and / or mental health which, according to the investigator, may affect the compliance of the study participant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Using the virtual reality headset for the first injection
Performing the first ultrasound-guided epidural injection through the sacrococcygeal hiatus using the virtual reality headset, then the second injection following the usual conditions of care without the device
Performing the first ultrasound-guided epidural injection through the sacrococcygeal hiatus using the virtual reality headset
Experimental: Using the virtual reality headset for the second injection
Performing the first ultrasound-guided epidural injection through the sacrococcygeal hiatus following the usual conditions of care, then the second injection using the virtual reality headset
Performing the second ultrasound-guided epidural injection through the sacrococcygeal hiatus using the virtual reality headset

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of peri-procedural anxiety when performing epidural injections through the sacrococcygeal hiatus
Time Frame: Day 7
Peri-procedural anxiety was measured with State and Trait Anxiety Index (STAI)
Day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the patient's anxiety
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention
Assessment of the patient's peri-procedural anxiety using the French version of the APAIS
Immediately after intervention
Measure of the duration of the intervention
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention
Immediately after intervention
Assessment of patient's pain
Time Frame: During intervention
Evaluation of maximum periprocedural pain on a numerical scale from 0 to 10
During intervention
Evaluation of the patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention
Evaluation of the patient satisfaction with the virtual reality device on a 4-level scale, with values of 1, 2, 3 and 4 (quantitative variable).
Immediately after intervention
Evaluation of the practitioner satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention
Evaluation of the practitioner satisfaction with the virtual reality device on a 4-level scale, with values of 1, 2, 3 and 4 (quantitative variable)
Immediately after intervention
Evaluation of lumbar and radicular pain
Time Frame: Before intervention
Assessment of lumbar pain on a numerical scale from 0 to 10 and of radicular pain on a numerical scale from numerical scale from 0 to 10
Before intervention
Tolerance and Comfort Questionnaire
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention
Immediately after intervention
Record of undesirable events
Time Frame: Before intervention
Before intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Radiculopathy

Clinical Trials on Virtual reality headset for first injection

3
Subscribe