Impact of the Be Well Care Well Program on Early Care Education Teachers

September 24, 2025 updated by: Medical University of South Carolina

Targeting Teacher Stress and Well-being to Improve Child Outcomes: Impact of the Be Well Care Well Program

The study will address the following specific aims: (1) assess the impact of the BWCW program on teacher stress and physical activity, (2) Examine feasibility of collecting cortisol.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

244

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • MUSC Department of Psychiatry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Teachers that meet the following criteria will be included:

  1. currently employed as a teacher or assistant teacher at a participating ECE center;
  2. ages 18 or older;
  3. men or women;
  4. able to speak, read, and write English.

Exclusion Criteria:

None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Experimental: Be Well Care Well
Be Well Care Well addresses teacher well-being through activities implemented in the classroom aimed at reducing teacher stress and improving physical activity. A subset of teachers involved in the program will complete classroom observations and cortisol testing to examine additional measures of stress.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Score of Child Worker Job Stress Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year follow-up
The Child Worker Job Stress Inventory is a survey used to measure job stress via questionnaire that the childcare worker completes. This survey measure contains 22 items that range from 22 (low levels of stress) to 110 (High Levels of Stress). A higher score on each item represents higher child worker stress. The total score is utilized in this study with higher total score representing higher reported child worker job stress.
Baseline and 1 year follow-up
Change in Score on the Devereux Adult Resilience Survey
Time Frame: Baseline and 1-year follow-up
The Devereux Adult Resilience Survey (DARS) is a 23-item self-report measure assessing personal strengths and resilience. Each item is scored from 0 (Not Yet) to 2 (Almost Always), yielding a raw total score range of 0-46. In this study, subscale scores (e.g., relationships, internal beliefs, professional skills) may be combined or analyzed separately. If a composite score is used, the method of combination (e.g., summing across subscales) will be specified in the analysis plan.
Baseline and 1-year follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Score on the Lifestyle Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and 1-year follow-up
The lifestyle questionnaire measured health and functioning. The physical activity subscale was used in this study, which had 18 items and ranged from 0-4 with higher scores representing more physical activity.
Baseline and 1-year follow-up
Change in Score on the Early Childhood Job Satisfaction Survey
Time Frame: Baseline and 1-year follow-up
The Early Childhood Job Satisfaction Survey measures work satisfaction regarding co-worker relations, supervisor support, nature of the work itself, working conditions, and pay and promotion opportunities. The total score is used in this study and contains 55 items that range from 1-5. Higher scores on this scale represent higher job satisfaction.
Baseline and 1-year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 00105341
  • U54GM104941 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burnout, Caregiver

Clinical Trials on Be Well Care Well

Subscribe