Lesion Composition and Quantitative Imaging Analysis on Breast Cancer Diagnosis

January 31, 2023 updated by: University of Hawaii
The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. To do this, the investigators have developed an innovative way to use FDA-approved breast imaging protocols to acquire multispectral images to measure the composition of suspicious breast lesions. The central hypothesis is that breast tissue composition in combination with analysis of morphological and textural tissue characteristics on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging will yield significantly higher breast cancer specificity than conventional interpretation of DBT alone.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Women with dense breast have not been shown to benefit by increased cancer detection of volumetric digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) but may benefit by lower recall rates. DBT screening biopsy rates are similar to 2D digital mammography; higher for first screening exams, lower thereafter with adjustment for age and breast density. In the U.S., 71% of biopsies do not result in a breast cancer diagnosis among women ages 40-79 who undergo breast cancer screening. To address the high rate of unnecessary biopsies, an innovative way to use FDA-approved breast imaging protocols has been developed to acquire multispectral images to measure the lipid/water/protein (L/W/P) composition of suspicious breast lesions. Malignant breast tissue has unique L/W/P composition fractions when compared to normal or benign breast tissue. This proposal aims to increase biopsy yield (BI-RADS-PPV3) through combining L/W/P biological biomarkers with quantitative morphological and textural image analysis. This combination of composition and physical descriptions of suspicious breast lesions is called q3CB. The benefits of adding q3CB to the current DBT screening/diagnostic imaging paradigm, that may already include computer aided detection, is not known. This study is designed to compare the expected biopsy yield with and without q3CB in a clinical reader study and explore how q3CB may be combine with existing technologies. The central hypothesis is that biological L/W/P fractions in breast tissue in combination with analysis of morphological and textural tissue characteristics will yield significantly higher breast cancer specificity than conventional interpretation of DBT alone. The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. The investigators rationale for the proposed research is that biological L/W/P descriptions of breast lesions will lead to more specific biopsy decisions and a better understanding of cancer types. Specifically, the project aims are 1) develop q3CB lesion signatures for distinguishing breast cancer lesions from benign lesions, using 600 prospectively-acquired DBT exams of women recommended to undergo biopsy; 2) conduct a clinical reader study to compare radiologists' performance on standard-of-care FFDM or DBT without and with the inclusion of q3CB signatures; 3) Investigate the utility of q3CB lesion signatures in a screening paradigm to improve sensitivity and specificity on CADe-identified suspicious lesions in the tasks of assessing malignancy as well as in associating with their association with cancer subtypes; Exploratory) explore the added sensitivity and specificity of dual-energy DBT in phantom studies that explore lesion size, composition, and breast density. The innovation of this study is the full characterization of lipid/water/protein lesion composition with DBT and how it complements existing computer aided diagnostic programs paired with clinical radiologists providing evidence ready for clinical translation of this unique and emerging technology.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • Recruiting
        • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Inc.
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bethany L Niell, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dana K Ataya, MD
    • Hawaii
      • Hilo, Hawaii, United States, 96720
        • Recruiting
        • Hawaii Radiology Associates, LTD (East Hawaii Women's Imaging Center)
        • Contact:
          • Scott Grosskreutz, MD
          • Phone Number: 808-935-1825
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Scott Grosskreutz, MD
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, 96822
        • Recruiting
        • The Queen's Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Richmond Clinical Research Associate
          • Phone Number: 808-691-7609
          • Email: riwong@queens.org
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Todd Seto, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All 600 women will be recruited and enrolled from one of three sites: Queen's Medical Center (Honolulu, HI), East Hawaii Women's Imaging Center (Hilo, HI), and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute (Tampa, FL).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Had a recent diagnostic mammogram with a BI-RADS diagnostic score 4 or 5 assigned by a radiologist (BIRADS are standardized mammography assessment categories: 4 is for "Suspicious abnormality", 5 is for "Highly suggestive of malignancy".
  • Have not had biopsy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • History of breast cancer or a mastectomy (removal of the breast) with Systemic Therapy (ex. Chemotherapy, hormones and hormone inhibitors, etc.).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantify biological composition of lesions
Time Frame: Baseline
Quantify the biological composition (lipid/water/protein) of suspicious lesions.
Baseline
Quantify morphology of lesions
Time Frame: Baseline
Quantify morphology/texture (radiomics) of suspicious lesions.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of radiologists' image interpretations with and without q3CB signatures
Time Frame: Baseline
Difference in AUC between the "1st read" and "2nd read" image interpretations. In the "1st read," they will be provided with the FFDM/DBT images and in the "2nd read," they will also be provided with the ncCEM q3CB composition and radiomics signature (likelihood of malignancy).
Baseline
Sensitivity and Specificity of readers' responses for the BI-RADs assessment categories
Time Frame: Baseline
Sensitivity and specificity values will be calculated: a BI-RADS assessment of 4a or higher (i.e., 4a, 4b, 4c, and 5) defined a positive call for cancer diagnosis and, conversely, a BI-RADS assessment of 3 or lower (i.e., 3, 2, and 1) defined a negative call for cancer diagnosis.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John A Shepherd, PhD, University of Hawaii Cancer Research Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SHEPHERD-2021-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

3
Subscribe