- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05375383
Microbial Colonization of Oral Probiotics
Assessment of Colonisation of Probiotic Bacterium Streptococcus Salivarius in the Oral Cavity
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Dietary supplement: Streptococcus salivarius K12 lozenge
- Dietary supplement: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 lozenges containing prebiotic A
- Dietary supplement: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 lozenges containing prebiotic B
- Dietary supplement: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 lozenges containing prebiotics A and B
- Dietary supplement: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 powder
- Dietary supplement: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 powder containing prebiotic A
- Dietary supplement: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 powder containing prebiotic B
- Dietary supplement: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 powder containing prebiotics A and B
- Dietary supplement: Probiotic S. salivarius M18 lozenges
- Dietary supplement: Probiotic S. salivarius M18 lozenges containing prebiotic A
- Dietary supplement: Probiotic S. salivarius M18 lozenges containing prebiotic B
- Dietary supplement: Probiotic S. salivarius M18 + lozenges containing prebiotic A and B
Detailed Description
This is a double-blind, randomized controlled colonization pilot study with no cross over to evaluate the colonization efficacy of lozenges and powders containing two different commercially available probiotic bacteria (S. salivarius K12 ) or S. salivarius M18 with or without 2 different prebiotic sugars or their combinations.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the 12 groups consuming probiotic lozenge or powder containing Streptococcus salivarius K12 or S. salivarius M18 with or without prebiotics (e.g. sugars that may promote probiotic activity) over a seven day period. Saliva samples will be collected at predetermined time points pre and post intervention. Colonisation efficacy will be determined by enumerating the probiotic in the saliva samples using standard microbiological techniques.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Otago
-
Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand, 9012
- Recruiting
- Blis Technologies Ltd
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Male or Female 18y - 80y age
- In general good health 18 - 80 years of age.
- Practice good oral hygiene.
Exclusion criteria:
- Have a history of autoimmune disease or are immunocompromised.
- Are on concurrent antibiotic therapy or regular antibiotic use within last 1 week
- History of allergy (e.g. dairy).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Streptococcus salivarius K12 lozenge
|
In this study, a lozenge will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 to the oral cavity.
|
Active Comparator: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 lozenges containing prebiotic A
Streptococcus salivarius K12 lozenge with prebiotic
|
In this study, a lozenge containing a prebiotic will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 to the oral cavity.
|
Active Comparator: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 lozenges containing prebiotic B
Streptococcus salivarius K12 lozenge with prebiotic
|
In this study, a lozenge containing a prebiotic will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 to the oral cavity.
|
Active Comparator: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 lozenges containing prebiotic A and B
Streptococcus salivarius K12
|
In this study, a lozenge containing two prebiotics will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 to the oral cavity.
|
Active Comparator: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 powder
Streptococcus salivarius K12 powder
|
In this study, a powder will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 to the oral cavity
|
Active Comparator: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 powder containing prebiotic A
Streptococcus salivarius K12 powder with prebiotic
|
In this study, a powder containing a prebiotic will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 to the oral cavity
|
Active Comparator: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 powder containing prebiotic B
Streptococcus salivarius K12 powder with prebiotic
|
In this study, a powder containing a prebiotic will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 to the oral cavity
|
Active Comparator: Probiotic S. salivarius K12 powder containing prebiotic A and B
Streptococcus salivarius K12 powder with prebiotic
|
In this study, a powder containing two prebiotics will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 to the oral cavity
|
Active Comparator: Probiotic S. salivarius M18 lozenges
Streptococcus salivarius M18 lozenge
|
In this study, a lozenge containing will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius M18 to the oral cavity.
|
Active Comparator: Probiotic S. salivarius M18 lozenges containing prebiotic A
Streptococcus salivarius M18 lozenge with prebiotic
|
In this study, a lozenge containing a prebiotic will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius M18 to the oral cavity.
|
Active Comparator: Probiotic S. salivarius M18 lozenges der containing prebiotic B
Streptococcus salivarius M18 lozenge with prebiotic
|
In this study, a lozenge containing a prebiotic will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius M18 to the oral cavity.
|
Active Comparator: Probiotic S. salivarius M18 + lozenges containing prebiotic A and B
Streptococcus salivarius M18 lozenge with prebiotic
|
In this study, a lozenge containing two prebiotics will be evaluated for its potential of delivering probiotic Streptococcus salivarius M18 to the oral cavity.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 1 hour for S. salivarius K12 lozenges
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius K12 with or without prebiotics from a lozenge format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to one hour after later across different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
1 hour
|
Change in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 8 hours or S. salivarius K12 lozenges
Time Frame: 8 hour
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius K12 with or without prebiotics from a lozenge format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to eight hours after later across different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
8 hour
|
Change in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 24 hours or S. salivarius K12 lozenges
Time Frame: 24 hour
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius K12 with or without prebiotics from a lozenge format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to 24 hours after later across different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
24 hour
|
Change in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 48 hours or S. salivarius K12 lozenges
Time Frame: 48 hour
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius K12 with or without prebiotics from a lozenge format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to 48hours after later across different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
48 hour
|
in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 1 hour for S. salivarius K12 powder format
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius K12 with or without prebiotics from a powder format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to one hour after later across two different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
1 hour
|
in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 8 hour for S. salivarius K12 powder format
Time Frame: 8 hours
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius K12 with or without prebiotics from a powder format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to 8 hours after later across two different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
8 hours
|
in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 24 hours for S. salivarius K12 powder format
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius K12 with or without prebiotics from a powder format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to 24 hours after later across two different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
24 hours
|
in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 48 hours for S. salivarius K12 powder format
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius K12 with or without prebiotics from a powder format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to 48 hours after later across two different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
48 hours
|
Change in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 1 hour for S. salivarius M18 lozenges
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius M18 with or without prebiotics from a lozenge format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to one hour after later across different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
1 hour
|
Change in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 8 hours for S. salivarius M18 lozenges
Time Frame: 8 hour
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius M18 with or without prebiotics from a lozenge format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to 8 hour after later across different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
8 hour
|
Change in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 24 hours for S. salivarius M18 lozenges
Time Frame: 24 hour
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius M18 with or without prebiotics from a lozenge format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to 24 hour after later across different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
24 hour
|
Change in microbial colonization from baseline (Day 0) to 48 hours for S. salivarius M18 lozenges
Time Frame: 48 hour
|
Study will determine the change in microbial colonization efficacy of Streptococcus salivarius M18 with or without prebiotics from a lozenge format.
The statistical analysis (e.g.
Students t-test) will be carried out to compare the participants data from baseline to 48 hour after later across different formulations with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Overall colonization based on percentage of population colonized for different interventions will also be analyzed average and standard deviation functions using appropriate statistical analysis software (e.g.
Microsoft Excel).
|
48 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: John D Hale, PhD, Blis Technologies Ltd
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Burton JP, Chilcott CN, Wescombe PA, Tagg JR. Extended Safety Data for the Oral Cavity Probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2010 Oct;2(3):135-44. doi: 10.1007/s12602-010-9045-4.
- Di Pierro F, Adami T, Rapacioli G, Giardini N, Streitberger C. Clinical evaluation of the oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 in the prevention of recurrent pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes in adults. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013 Mar;13(3):339-43. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2013.758711. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
- Di Pierro F, Colombo M, Zanvit A, Rottoli AS. Positive clinical outcomes derived from using Streptococcus salivarius K12 to prevent streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis in children: a pilot investigation. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2016 Nov 21;8:77-81. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S117214. eCollection 2016.
- Di Pierro F, Colombo M, Giuliani MG, Danza ML, Basile I, Bollani T, Conti AM, Zanvit A, Rottoli AS. Effect of administration of Streptococcus salivarius K12 on the occurrence of streptococcal pharyngo-tonsillitis, scarlet fever and acute otitis media in 3 years old children. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016 Nov;20(21):4601-4606.
- Di Pierro F, Zanvit A, Nobili P, Risso P, Fornaini C. Cariogram outcome after 90 days of oral treatment with Streptococcus salivarius M18 in children at high risk for dental caries: results of a randomized, controlled study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015 Oct 3;7:107-13. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S93066. eCollection 2015.
- Bardellini E, Amadori F, Gobbi E, Ferri A, Conti G, Majorana A. Does Streptococcus Salivarius Strain M18 Assumption Make Black Stains Disappear in Children? Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020;18(1):161-164. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a43359.
- Hyink O, Wescombe PA, Upton M, Ragland N, Burton JP, Tagg JR. Salivaricin A2 and the novel lantibiotic salivaricin B are encoded at adjacent loci on a 190-kilobase transmissible megaplasmid in the oral probiotic strain Streptococcus salivarius K12. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Feb;73(4):1107-13. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02265-06. Epub 2006 Dec 28.
- Gregori G, Righi O, Risso P, Boiardi G, Demuru G, Ferzetti A, Galli A, Ghisoni M, Lenzini S, Marenghi C, Mura C, Sacchetti R, Suzzani L. Reduction of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus pharyngo-tonsillar infections associated with use of the oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12: a retrospective observational study. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Jan 19;12:87-92. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S96134. eCollection 2016.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BLTCT2022/3
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Microbial Colonization
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedMicrobial Colonization and Colorectal Disease
-
NHS FifeUniversity of TurkuUnknownDental Caries | Oral Microbial ColonizationUnited Kingdom
-
University Magna GraeciaRecruiting
-
Medical University InnsbruckCompleted
-
Min-Tze LIONGInternational Islamic University MalaysiaRecruiting
-
VU University of AmsterdamWageningen University and Research; Maag Lever Darm Stichting; Cidrani; WholeFiber and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
BLIS Technologies LimitedActive, not recruiting
-
Becton, Dickinson and CompanyCompleted
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedMicrobial ColonizationUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
Clinical Trials on Streptococcus salivarius K12 lozenge
-
West China HospitalCompletedHead and Neck Squamous Cell CarcinomaChina
-
Liaquat University of Medical & Health SciencesNot yet recruitingStreptococcus Pyogenes PharyngotonsillitisPakistan
-
University of SouthamptonUnknown
-
Liaquat University of Medical & Health SciencesCompletedUpper Respiratory Tract InfectionPakistan
-
BLIS Technologies LimitedRecruiting
-
John HaleRecruitingLower Respiratory Tract Infection | Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionNew Zealand
-
Kaplan Medical CenterUnknown
-
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityI. Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and SeraCompleted
-
John HaleRecruiting
-
BLIS Technologies LimitedNot yet recruiting