Gut Health Enhancement by Eating Favourable Food (GEEFomjebuik)

January 9, 2024 updated by: Remco Kort, VU University of Amsterdam
Within the GEEF om je buik study the effect of 8 weeks intervention with either a diet rich in fiber or fermented food on the gut microbiota will be investigated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with three intervention groups (high dietary fiber group (HDF), high fermented foods group (HFF), and a control group (CG)). The total duration of the study is 5 months and consists of an 8-week intervention ( 2-week ramp up period with dietary guidelines, followed by 6-week period with dietary guidelines + additional consumption of study products) and a follow-up after 3 months. In total 147 subjects will be included.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

146

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6708 WG
        • Stichting Wageningen Research
        • Contact:
          • Nicole de Wit, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and Women, aged ≥18 - ≤70 years;
  • Being able to read and speak Dutch;
  • Willing to keep a stable dietary pattern throughout the study, apart from the dietary advice in the study;
  • Having a smartphone compatible with the Lifedata or PocketQ app to fill out the daily questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a disease or medical condition which can influence the study results such as diabetes, cancer, diagnosed irritable bowel syndrome, renal disease, liver enzyme abnormality, malignant neoplasm, or a history of inflammatory diseases (such as multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease);
  • Having a history of intestinal surgery that might interfere with study outcomes (this does not include an appendectomy or cholecystectomy);
  • Average dietary fiber intake of ≥18 gram (women) or ≥22 gram (men) per day, according to the fiber screen questionnaire (see F1 questionnaires);
  • More than 3 servings of fermented foods per day as assessed with the fermented food frequency questionnaire (see F1 questionnaires);
  • Having a Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≥ 30 kg/m2 (self-reported);
  • Currently following a strict diet and unwilling or unable to change; for example, a gluten free diet or a "crash diet" using meal substitutes;
  • Specific food allergies that interfere with dietary intervention (for example, gluten, lactose, etc);
  • Use of prebiotics, probiotics and/or synbiotics (this should be stopped 4 weeks before the start of the study) and use of fiber supplements;
  • Use of antibiotic treatment less than 3 months before start of the study and/or use of antibiotics during the study;
  • Use of medication that can interfere with the study outcomes, as judged by the medical supervisor;
  • Alcoholic use of ≥14 (women) or ≥28 (men) glasses of alcoholic beverages per week;
  • Use of soft or hard drugs (should be stopped at least 4 weeks before start of the study);
  • Being pregnant or lactating;
  • Participation in another clinical trial at the same time;
  • Student or employee working at either Food, Health and Consumer Research from Wageningen Food and Biobased Research, Microbiology at VU, the MLDS, at WholeFiber, Keep Food Simple or at Cidrani;
  • Unable to follow or comply to study rules.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fiber arm

Subjects receive dietary guidelines, to increase their fiber intake. Additionally, during the last 6 weeks of the intervention period subjects receive a study product containing 8,5 grams fiber per day.

Additionally, subjects receive general guidelines about the effect of nutrition on the gut microbiome.

WholeFiberTM is a product with high levels of prebiotic dietary fibers (~85%) mainly consisting of inulin, and some pectin, hemi-cellulose and cellulose that is derived from the root vegetable, chicory roots.

Fiber guidelines:

Subjects receive a booklet with recipes high in fiber. Subjects are recommended to use 2 recipes per day + a snack. Estimated average intake via the recipes in the recipe booklet is 24 grams/day.

General guidelines on nutrition and microbiome:

Subjects receive a link to a website with general recommendations to positively alter the gut microbiome (website Voedingscentrum and Dutch Digestive Foundation).

Other Names:
  • Chicory roots
Experimental: Fermented food arm

Subjects receive dietary guidelines, to increase their intake of fermented foods.

Additionally, during the last 6 weeks of the intervention period subjects receive a study product of 17 millilitres concentrated kombucha per day.

Additionally, subjects receive general guidelines about the effect of nutrition on the gut microbiome.

The kombucha is produced by a minimum three-month long fermentation process. It is a live fermented herbal drink essence, without refined sugar, and an unpasteurized, organic product.

Fermented food guidelines:

Study participants in the fermented foods arm are asked to use 3 additional servings of fermented food per day, using the fermented food list / recipe booklet.

General guidelines on nutrition and microbiome:

Subjects receive a link to a website with general recommendations to positively alter the gut microbiome (website Voedingscentrum and Dutch Digestive Foundation).

Other Names:
  • Fermented tea
Placebo Comparator: Control

Subjects receive general guidelines about the effect of nutrition on the gut microbiome.

Additionally, during the last 6 weeks of the intervention period subjects receive a placebo product of 10 grams maltodextrin per day.

Maltodextrin DE19/21 is a digestible carbohydrate, that is completely digested and does not reach the colon, which makes it a suitable placebo dietary compound and the reason why it is frequently used in comparable studies.

General guidelines on nutrition and microbiome:

Subjects receive a link to a website with general recommendations to positively alter the gut microbiome (website Voedingscentrum and Dutch Digestive Foundation).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbiota diversity
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Microbioal richness (ASV) using 16s rRNA
Baseline (week 0)
Microbiota diversity
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
Microbioal richness (ASV) using 16s rRNA
End ramp-up (week 2)
Microbiota diversity
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
Microbioal richness (ASV) using 16s rRNA
End intervention (week 8)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gut microbiota composition
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
16s rRNA
Baseline (week 0)
Gut microbiota composition
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
16s rRNA
End ramp-up (week 2)
Gut microbiota composition
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
16s rRNA
End intervention (week 8)
Carbohydrate Active Enzymes (CAZymes)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Relative abundance of CAZymes using shotgun metagenomic sequencing
Baseline (week 0)
Carbohydrate Active Enzymes (CAZymes)
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
Relative abundance of CAZymes using shotgun metagenomic sequencing
End ramp-up (week 2)
Carbohydrate Active Enzymes (CAZymes)
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
Relative abundance of CAZymes using shotgun metagenomic sequencing
End intervention (week 8)
Dietary intake
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Average intake of fiber, fermented foods and macronutrients using the Traqq app
Baseline (week 0)
Dietary intake
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
Average intake of fiber, fermented foods and macronutrients using the Traqq app
End ramp-up (week 2)
Dietary intake
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
Average intake of fiber, fermented foods and macronutrients using the Traqq app
End intervention (week 8)
Dietary intake
Time Frame: End follow-up (5 months)
Average intake of fiber, fermented foods and macronutrients using the Traqq app
End follow-up (5 months)
Gastrointestinal complaints
Time Frame: Daily during intervention (week 0 - week 8)
Likert-point scale (scores 0 - 10), for bloating, flatulence and abdominal pain. A higher score means more bloating, flatulence and abdominal pain.
Daily during intervention (week 0 - week 8)
Stool frequency
Time Frame: Daily during intervention (week 0 - week 8)
Frequency of bowel movement per day
Daily during intervention (week 0 - week 8)
Abundance of Prevotella
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
Baseline (week 0)
Abundance of Prevotella
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
End ramp-up (week 2)
Abundance of Prevotella
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
End intervention (week 8)
Abundance of Bacteroides
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
Baseline (week 0)
Abundance of Bacteroides
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
End ramp-up (week 2)
Abundance of Bacteroides
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
End intervention (week 8)
Ratio of Prevotella/Bacteroides
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
Baseline (week 0)
Ratio of Prevotella/Bacteroides
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
End ramp-up (week 2)
Ratio of Prevotella/Bacteroides
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
End intervention (week 8)
Microbial alpha diversity
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
Baseline (week 0)
Microbial alpha diversity
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
End ramp-up (week 2)
Microbial alpha diversity
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
Based on a faecal smear image, using MicrobeLink tool from HORAIZON (AI, machine learning).
End intervention (week 8)
Transit time
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Using blue dye method (two blue muffins)
Baseline (week 0)
Transit time
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
Using blue dye method (two blue muffins)
End ramp-up (week 2)
Transit time
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
Using blue dye method (two blue muffins)
End intervention (week 8)
Sleep quality
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Athens insomnia scale. Score range: 0-28 points. Higher score means worse outcome.
Baseline (week 0)
Sleep quality
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
Athens insomnia scale. Score range: 0-28 points. Higher score indicates worse sleep quality.
End ramp-up (week 2)
Sleep quality
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
Athens insomnia scale. Score range: 0-28 points. Higher score indicates worse sleep quality.
End intervention (week 8)
Sleep quality
Time Frame: End follow-up (5 months)
Athens insomnia scale. Score range: 0-28 points. Higher score indicates worse sleep quality.
End follow-up (5 months)
Digestion associated Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Digestion associated Quality of Life (DQLQ) questionnaire. Score range: 0-9. Higher score indicates worse digestion associated quality of life.
Baseline (week 0)
Digestion associated Quality of Life
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
Digestion associated Quality of Life (DQLQ) questionnaire. Score range: 0-9. Higher score indicates worse digestion associated quality of life.
End ramp-up (week 2)
Digestion associated Quality of Life
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
Digestion associated Quality of Life (DQLQ) questionnaire. Score range: 0-9. Higher score indicates worse digestion associated quality of life.
End intervention (week 8)
Digestion associated Quality of Life
Time Frame: End follow-up (5 months)
Digestion associated Quality of Life (DQLQ) questionnaire. Score range: 0-9. Higher score indicates worse digestion associated quality of life.
End follow-up (5 months)
Well-being
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
World Health Organisation (WHO)-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) questionnaire. Raw score ranges from 0-25. Final score is calculated by multiplying the raw score by 4. Final score range 0-100. Higher score indicates better well-being.
Baseline (week 0)
Well-being
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
World Health Organisation (WHO)-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) questionnaire. Raw score ranges from 0-25. Final score is calculated by multiplying the raw score by 4. Final score range 0-100. Higher score indicates better well-being.
End ramp-up (week 2)
Well-being
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
World Health Organisation (WHO)-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) questionnaire. Raw score ranges from 0-25. Final score is calculated by multiplying the raw score by 4. Final score range 0-100. Higher score indicates better well-being.
End intervention (week 8)
Well-being
Time Frame: End follow-up (5 months)
World Health Organisation (WHO)-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) questionnaire. Raw score ranges from 0-25. Final score is calculated by multiplying the raw score by 4. Final score range 0-100. Higher score indicates better well-being.
End follow-up (5 months)
Subjective health (perception and awareness)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
A 2-item questionnaire, which assesses how healthy participants perceive their own health and diet. Score range: 2 - 14, higher scores mean a higher subjective health
Baseline (week 0)
Subjective health (perception and awareness)
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
A 2-item questionnaire, which assesses how healthy participants perceive their own health and diet. Score range: 2 - 14, higher scores mean a higher subjective health
End intervention (week 8)
Subjective health (perception and awareness)
Time Frame: End follow-up (5 months)
A 2-item questionnaire, which assesses how healthy participants perceive their own health and diet. Score range: 2 - 14, higher scores mean a higher subjective health
End follow-up (5 months)
Intention to stay healthy (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
A 3-item questionnaire, which assesses the extent to which participants have the intention to eat healthy. Score range: 3 - 21, higher scores mean more intention to stay healthy
Baseline (week 0)
Intention to stay healthy (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
A 3-item questionnaire, which assesses the extent to which participants have the intention to eat healthy. Score range: 3 - 21, higher scores mean more intention to stay healthy
End intervention (week 8)
Intention to stay healthy (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: End follow-up (5 months)
A 3-item questionnaire, which assesses the extent to which participants have the intention to eat healthy. Score range: 3 - 21, higher scores mean more intention to stay healthy
End follow-up (5 months)
Dietary intrinsic motivation (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
A validated 6-item questionnaire, which assesses whether someone's motivation to eat healthy comes from within a person. Score range: 6 - 42, higher scores mean a higher intrinsic motivation.
Baseline (week 0)
Dietary intrinsic motivation (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
A validated 6-item questionnaire, which assesses whether someone's motivation to eat healthy comes from within a person. Score range: 6 - 42, higher scores mean a higher intrinsic motivation.
End intervention (week 8)
Dietary intrinsic motivation (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: End follow-up (5 months)
A validated 6-item questionnaire, which assesses whether someone's motivation to eat healthy comes from within a person. Score range: 6 - 42, higher scores mean a higher intrinsic motivation.
End follow-up (5 months)
Dietary self-efficacy (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
A validated 8-item questionnaire, which assesses the extent to which one feels capable of eating healthy. Score range: 8 - 49, higher scores mean a higher self-efficacy
Baseline (week 0)
Dietary self-efficacy (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
A validated 8-item questionnaire, which assesses the extent to which one feels capable of eating healthy. Score range: 8 - 49, higher scores mean a higher self-efficacy
End intervention (week 8)
Dietary self-efficacy (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: End follow-up (5 months)
A validated 8-item questionnaire, which assesses the extent to which one feels capable of eating healthy. Score range: 8 - 49, higher scores mean a higher self-efficacy
End follow-up (5 months)
Self-regulation (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
A 5-item questionnaire, which assesses the ability to plan and monitor actions. Score range: 5 - 35, higher scores mean a higher self-regulation
Baseline (week 0)
Self-regulation (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
A 5-item questionnaire, which assesses the ability to plan and monitor actions. Score range: 5 - 35, higher scores mean a higher self-regulation
End intervention (week 8)
Self-regulation (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: End follow-up (5 months)
A 5-item questionnaire, which assesses the ability to plan and monitor actions. Score range: 5 - 35, higher scores mean a higher self-regulation
End follow-up (5 months)
Subjective knowledge (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
A validated 5-item questionnaire, which assesses how knowledgeable someone feels about nutrition and gut microbiota. Score range: 5 - 35, higher scores mean a higher subjective knowledge
Baseline (week 0)
Subjective knowledge (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
A validated 5-item questionnaire, which assesses how knowledgeable someone feels about nutrition and gut microbiota. Score range: 5 - 35, higher scores mean a higher subjective knowledge
End intervention (week 8)
Subjective knowledge (perception + awareness)
Time Frame: End follow-up (5 months)
A validated 5-item questionnaire, which assesses how knowledgeable someone feels about nutrition and gut microbiota. Score range: 5 - 35, higher scores mean a higher subjective knowledge
End follow-up (5 months)
92 inflammatory serum proteins
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
92 protein biomarkers proteins associated with inflammatory and immune response processes measured in dried blood spots using the Olink target 96 panels. Expressed as normalized protein expression (NPX).
Baseline (week 0)
92 inflammatory serum proteins
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
92 protein biomarkers proteins associated with inflammatory and immune response processes measured in dried blood spots using the Olink target 96 panels. Expressed as normalized protein expression (NPX).
End ramp-up (week 2)
92 inflammatory serum proteins
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
92 protein biomarkers proteins associated with inflammatory and immune response processes measured in dried blood spots using the Olink target 96 panels. Expressed as normalized protein expression (NPX).
End intervention (week 8)
Stool consistency
Time Frame: Daily during intervention (week 0 - week 8)
Consistency per stool, based on Bristol Stool Score (type 1 -7). Scores 1-7. A higher score means more loose / watery stool.
Daily during intervention (week 0 - week 8)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
Baseline (week 0)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: End ramp-up (week 2)
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
End ramp-up (week 2)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: End intervention (week 8)
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
End intervention (week 8)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: End follow-up (5 months)
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
End follow-up (5 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicole de Wit, PhD, Wageningen Food and Biobased Research
  • Principal Investigator: Remco Kort, PhD, VU University of Amsterdam

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 26, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL83652.028.23

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Microbial Colonization

Clinical Trials on WholeFiber

3
Subscribe