Reliability of Longshi Scale With Remote Assessment

May 26, 2022 updated by: Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

Reliability of Longshi Scale With Remote Assessment of Smartphone Video Calls for Stroke Patients'Activities of Daily Living

To explore the reliability of remote Longshi Scale assessment with smartphone video calls by comparing the consistency of remote assessment and bedside assessment, as well as the test-retest reliability of the remote assessment. The evaluation duration of these two methods was recorded and the level of satisfaction of patients and evaluators was investigated.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

129

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
        • Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Stroke survivors from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at Shenzhen Second People's Hospital are invited to participate in this study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a.Stroke survivors

    1. aged 18 and above;
    2. diagnosed with cerebral infraction or intracerebral hemorrhage;
    3. stroke onset2 weeks;
    4. stable vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation and temperature);
    5. voluntary or guardian consent to participate in the study.

      b.Evaluators

    1. registered rehabilitation practitioner;
    2. experience in rehabilitation scientific research or education related work for more than two years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a.Stroke survivors

    1. brain tumor, Parkinson's disease or active epilepsy within past three months;
    2. a history of mental illness such as mania or delirium;
    3. participation in any other clinical study. b.Evaluators
    1. unable to finish the training of Longshi Scale or use smartphones proficiently.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Assessed with the remote assessment of Longshi Scale first and then with bedside assessment
Assessed with the bedside assessment of Longshi Scale first and then with remote assessment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Consistency of the disability degree evaluated using the remote assessment and the bedside assessment of Longshi Scale.
Time Frame: Within 24 hours
Weighted kappa(wK) and Bland-Altman were used to determined the consistency between the results of remote assessment method and bedside assessment method. The interpretation of wK scores was in accordance with published standards (values>0.75 indicating excellent agreement beyond chance; 0.4~0.75, moderate agreement beyond chance; <0.4, poor agreement beyond chance).
Within 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The test-retest reliability of the remote video assessment
Time Frame: Within 24 hours after first evaluation
the result of remote assessment test-retest was analyzed by Weighted kappa(wK) scores.The interpretation of wK scores was in accordance with published standards (values>0.75 indicating excellent agreement beyond chance; 0.4~0.75, moderate agreement beyond chance; <0.4, poor agreement beyond chance).
Within 24 hours after first evaluation
Satisfaction survey of remote assessment
Time Frame: Within 24 hours after the remote assessment
The satisfaction survey data were summarized as mean±standard deviation, and also summarized as the percentage of satisfaction categories.
Within 24 hours after the remote assessment
Assessment duration
Time Frame: Within 24 hours
The assessment duration was analyzed by independent t-test.
Within 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 25, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

3
Subscribe