Efficacy of Alpha-blockers (Tamsulosin) in the Treatment of Symptomatic Dysuria in Multiple Sclerosis in Women (ALPHA-SEP)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the leading non-traumatic cause of severe acquired disability in young people. The disease is defined by relapses, which can affect all neurological functions depending on the location of the new inflammatory lesion(s). The disease can thus manifest itself through bladder and bowel disorders (BWS), which affect approximately 80% of MS patients in all stages. Lower urinary tract dysfunction has a significant negative impact on the quality of life of patients and places a significant burden on the healthcare system in terms of resource allocation. In addition, there is a risk of long-term chronic renal failure, an infectious risk (recurrent cystitis and/or pyelonephritis, sometimes life-threatening) and a lithiasis risk.

The most frequently observed urinary symptoms are: urinary frequency, urgency with or without urinary incontinence, dysuria and chronic retention of urine. These disorders most often combine bladder hyperactivity and dysuria. This dysuria may be responsible for recurrent urinary tract infections, lithiasis, alteration of renal function.

The only therapeutic class currently used to treat dysuria in MS is alpha-blockers. Tamsulosin, alfusozin and doxazosin induce relaxation of the urethral smooth sphincter and prostatic urethral muscle fibers, facilitating the removal of subvesical obstruction and bladder emptying.

The study investigators hypothesize that treatment with tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily in adult MS patients with dysuria will result in symptom improvement as assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) scores, a decrease in post-void residual, and an improvement in urine flow and quality of life.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nîmes, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Nîmes
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Eric Thouvenot
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Giovanni Castelnovo
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kamel Ben Naoum
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephane DROUPY

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • Patient with multiple sclerosis (EDSS score < 7.5).
  • Moderate to severe dysuria (IPSS score > 7) due to bladder sphincter dyssynergia confirmed by complete urodynamic workup.
  • Patient under stable treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is participating in another category 1 interventional study, or a trial involving a non-CE marked or CE marked off-label medical device or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
  • The subject refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to give the subject informed information
  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
  • Hypersensitivity to tamsulosin hydrochloride, including angioedema induced by the drug or any of the excipients.
  • History of orthostatic hypotension.
  • Severe hepatic impairment.
  • Concomitant treatment with diclofenac, warfarin, CYP3A4 inhibitors.
  • - Patient with complete urinary retention at the time of the pre-inclusion consultation, requiring management by intermittent self-catheterization or, failing that, an indwelling bladder catheter from the outset.
  • Major medical or psychiatric illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, would place the subject at risk or could compromise compliance with the study protocol.
  • Presence of another neurological pathology (excluding MS).
  • Swallowing problems that compromise oral medication.
  • Scheduled cataract surgery within 4 months.
  • Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
one placebo capsule per day for 30 days. with identical appearance (color and size) to the experimental drug, composed of microcrystalline cellulose
Experimental: Tamsulosin
One 0.4mg Tamsulosin capsule taken per day for 30 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urinary symptoms between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
Measured using the International Prostate Symptom Scale (IPSS), scoring ranging from 0-35
Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
Urinary symptoms between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Measured using the International Prostate Symptom Scale (IPSS), scoring ranging from 0-35
End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Urinary symptoms between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
Measured using the International Prostate Symptom Scale (IPSS), scoring ranging from 0-35
Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
Urinary symptoms between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
Measured using the International Prostate Symptom Scale (IPSS), scoring ranging from 0-35
End of first intervention phase (Day 90)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urinary symptoms between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
Measured using the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) questionnaire: score ranging from 0-39
Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
Urinary symptoms between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Measured using the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) questionnaire: score ranging from 0-39
End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Urinary symptoms between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
Measured using the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) questionnaire: score ranging from 0-39
Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
Urinary symptoms between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
Measured using the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) questionnaire: score ranging from 0-39
End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
Post-mictional residue between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
ml, measured with BladderScan
Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
Post-mictional residue between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
ml, measured with BladderScan
End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Post-mictional residue between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
ml, measured with BladderScan
Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
Post-mictional residue between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
ml, measured with BladderScan
End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
Maximum urine flow rate between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
ml/s
Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
Maximum urine flow rate between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
ml/s
End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Maximum urine flow rate between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
ml/s
Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
Maximum urine flow rate between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
ml/s
End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
Quality of life linked to urinary dysfunction between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
Qualiveen-30 questionnaire; score 0-4
Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
Quality of life linked to urinary dysfunction between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Qualiveen-30 questionnaire; score 0-4
End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Quality of life linked to urinary dysfunction between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
Qualiveen-30 questionnaire; score 0-4
Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
Quality of life linked to urinary dysfunction between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
Qualiveen-30 questionnaire; score 0-4
End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
Quality of life between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
EQ-5D questionnaire; score 0-100
Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
Quality of life between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
EQ-5D questionnaire; score 0-100
End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Quality of life between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
EQ-5D questionnaire; score 0-100
Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
Quality of life between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
EQ-5D questionnaire; score 0-100
End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
Fatigue between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale; score 0-84
Start of first intervention phase (Day 0)
Fatigue between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale; score 0-84
End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Fatigue between groups
Time Frame: Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale; score 0-84
Start of first intervention phase (Day 60)
Fatigue between groups
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale; score 0-84
End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
Drug safety
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Yes/no occurence of the following adverse events: headache, asthenia, gastrointestinal disorders, orthostatic hypotension
End of first intervention phase (Day 30)
Drug safety
Time Frame: End of first intervention phase (Day 90)
Yes/no occurence of the following adverse events: headache, asthenia, gastrointestinal disorders, orthostatic hypotension
End of first intervention phase (Day 90)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stéphane DROUPY, CHU de Nîmes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Tamsulosin

Subscribe