Use of Tranexamic Acid After Vaginal Delivery With Episiotomy a RCT Placebo Control Trail

August 30, 2023 updated by: Eran Brazilay, MD PhD, Assuta Ashdod Hospital
The objective of this study is to assess the effect of TA treatment on decline in Hb levels following vaginal delivery with an episiotomy, compared to a control group not receiving TA.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Vaginal delivery is often characterized by excessive blood loss. Normal range of blood loss in uncomplicated vaginal delivery is up to 500 ml. Despite this, most women can adapt due to hemodynamic changes that occur during pregnancy Several factors during labor can promote major blood loss that may be defined as post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) Early PPH (E-PPH) is defined by the World Health Organization as "blood loss from the birth canal in excess of 500 ml during the first 24 hours after delivery E-PPH occurs in up to 6% of births and it is one of the main causes of maternal morbidity and mortality accounting for about 25% of maternal deaths worldwide Among morbidities, E-PPH can lead to post-partum anemia (PPA). PPA incidence is estimated between 50%-80% of women PPA is defined as level of hemoglobin (Hb) of 11 gr/dl one week after delivery Anemia is associated with fatigue, post-partum depression and is a significant health problem in women during the reproductive age .

One of the major causes of E-PPH is perineal trauma. Perineal trauma is present in up to 85% of births either due to an episiotomy or spontaneous tear or a combination of them both During the the second stage of labor, the midwife or the obstetrician may need to make a surgical incision (episiotomy) to increase the diameter of the vaginal outlet and facilitate the baby's birth This procedure is done with scissors or scalpel and requires repair by suturing (14). In the United States, episiotomy rate was 11.6% in 2012 In a study published by Alvarez et al in 2017, the average reduction in Hb was 1.46 ± 1.09 g/dl following vaginal delivery with a second degree tear but without an episiotomy and 2.07 ± 1.24 following vaginal delivery with an episiotomy and no perineal tear. The greatest reduction in Hb occurred among women with episiotomy and a third or fourth degree tear with a decrease of 3.1 ± 1.32 g/dl.

Different strategies have been described for preventing and treatment PPH, including active management of the third stage of labor, among them uterine massage and controlled cord traction in addition to oxytocin and the use of Tranexamic acid (TA) as PPH treatment Tranexamic acid (TA) is a lysine analog, which acts as an antifibrinolytic via competitive inhibition to the binding of plasmin and plasminogen to fibrin. TA reaches peak plasma concentration immediately after intravenous administration A meta-analysis evaluated the use of tranexamic acid after vaginal delivery for prevention of primary PPH. When used as prophylaxis within 10 min after vaginal delivery usually at the dose of 1 g IV, in addition to standard prophylaxis with oxytocin, tranexamic acid reduced the risk of primary PPH and the mean post-partum blood loss However there are no studies that evaluated the impact of TA on blood loss after vaginal deliveries with an episiotomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shfela
      • Ashdod, Shfela, Israel, 7712302

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. women aged 18-45
  2. 37-42 weeks gestation
  3. Singleton pregnancy
  4. Cephalic presentation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any contra-indication for vaginal birth
  2. PPH risk factors

    1. Dysfunctional labor
    2. Over distended uterus (macrosomia ,Polyhydramnios,multiple gestation)
    3. Grand multiparity
    4. Chorioamnionitis
    5. Precipitous labor
    6. Operative delivery
    7. Prolonged second stage
  3. Previous pph
  4. Preeclampsia
  5. Placental abruption
  6. Previous cesarean delivery
  7. Thrombophilia or coagulopathy
  8. Allergy to TA

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hexakakapron group
women with an episiotomy after vaginal delivery
1 gram of tranexamic acid in 100 ml of 0.9% normal saline
Other Names:
  • Hexakapron
Placebo Comparator: control group
women with an episiotomy after vaginal delivery
100 ml of 0.9% normal saline
Other Names:
  • saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delta Hb levels
Time Frame: 24 hours from delivery
Delta-Hb (Hb level prior delivery - Hb levels 24 h after birth)
24 hours from delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PPH rate
Time Frame: 24 hours from delivery
early post partum hemorrhage
24 hours from delivery
Uterotonics use
Time Frame: 24 hours from delivery
Use of additional uterotonics drugs(other than oxytocin)- dichotomies scale, yes or no
24 hours from delivery
Blood transfusion
Time Frame: 72 hours from delivery
Use of Blood packed cells during hospitalization, dichotomies scale - yes or no
72 hours from delivery
hospital admission
Time Frame: 120 hours from delivery
Number of hospital admission days
120 hours from delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Atara De Porto Amrany, MD, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia

Clinical Trials on Tranexamic acid

3
Subscribe