Esketamine Induction Intubation in ICU Patients.

Clinical Effects of Esketamine Induction Intubation Versus Conventional Induction Intubation in ICU Patients: a Single-center Randomized Clinical Trial

Intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is usually an emergency. Pathophysiological changes such as shock, respiratory failure, and metabolic acidosis in critically ill patients can significantly increase the incidence of adverse events during intubation.

Studies have shown that esketamine has no significant effect on body metabolism, endocrine system, liver, kidney, intestinal function and coagulation function. In terms of drug metabolism, esketamine has high bioavailability, short half-life, faster and more comfortable recovery of patients, and not only has the advantage of providing stable hemodynamics during endotracheal intubation, but also counteracts the respiratory depression caused by opioids. In addition, esketamine has antidepressant and anti-inflammatory properties. The investigators also found that combined prophylactic and therapeutic use of esketamine could attenuate systemic inflammation and inflammatory multi-organ injury in mice after CLP-induced lethal sepsis.

This project aims to study the clinical effect of esketamine induction intubation and conventional induction intubation in ICU patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Esketamine is the S-enantiomer of ketamine and has been approved for clinical use by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in 2019. Studies have shown that esketamine has no significant effect on metabolism, endocrine system, liver, kidney, intestinal function and coagulation function. It is mainly used in combination with sedatives (such as propofol, etc.) or alone to induce and implement general anesthesia. The phase III clinical study on the application of esketamine in the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery showed that the recovery time of the esketamine group was significantly shorter than that of the ketamine group when the same clinical anesthesia effect was achieved. Esketamine has the effect of dissociative anesthesia, which can maintain better spontaneous breathing of patients while satisfying outpatient examinations or operations, and this feature helps maintain circulatory stability, especially in patients with shock. Esketamine has sympathomimetic properties. In patients with potentially unstable cardiac disease (eg, septic cardiomyopathy), esketamine is the preferred choice for induction of anesthesia, especially in combination with midazolam. Esketamine is also the preferred choice for anesthesia induction in patients with bronchospasm, which can protect patients from bronchospasm during induction.

Studies have found that esketamine has antidepressant and anti-inflammatory effects in addition to its analgesic, sedative and anesthetic effects. Clinical studies have shown that esketamine (0.25 mg/kg, 40 min infusion time) can rapidly improve the depressive symptoms of patients with treatment-resistant depression. The antidepressant effects of esketamine may be closely related to its anti-inflammatory effect. During cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, anesthesia induction was supplemented with 1-3 mg/kg esketamine, anesthesia maintenance was supplemented with 2-3 mg/kg/h esketamine, anesthesia maintenance time was 283 minutes, the total amount of esketamine was 1580mg on average. Esketamine decreased plasma levels of IL-6 (6 h after opening the aorta) and IL-8 (1 and 6 h after opening the aorta) and increased plasma levels of IL-10 (1 h after opening the aorta). In the investigators' preliminary study on the role of esketamine in systemic inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the investigators found that in systemic LPS (5 mg/kg)-induced systemic inflammation model, esketamine (10 mg/kg, IP) was administrated twice 24 hours before LPS administration and 10 minutes after LPS administration. The plasma levels of IL-6, IL-17A and interferon γ (IFN-γ) were significantly decreased 24 h after LPS administration in mice. However, the efficacy and safety of esketamine for tracheal intubation in ICU patients is still unclear, and no relevant clinical studies have been reported.

The investigators will include adult patients subjected to tracheal intubation in the ICU strictly according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria to investigate the efficacy and safety of esketamine for tracheal intubation in ICU patients.

Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the esketamine intubation group and the conventional intubation group. In esketamine intubation group, esketamine at 0.5-1.0 mg/kg BW and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg BW was given intravenously for induction intubation. In conventional intubation group, Midazolam at 0.1mg/kg BW, fentanil citrate at 1ug/kg BW, rocuronium bromide at 0.6mg/kg BW was given intravenously for induction intubation.Both groups were given roccuronium bromide (0.6 mg/kg) before intubation. Sufentanil citrate (0.08-0.15 μg/kg/h) combined with remimazolam besylate (0.15-0.25 mg/kg/h) was administered intravenously to sustain a Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) score 0 and a Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -3 and 0 following intubation. Before induction, monitors were applied:

continuous electrocardiograph (ECG), continuous pulse oximetry, invasive blood pressure monitor through a 20-G radial arterial catheter connected to a pressure transducer placed at the level of the heart.

Five tubes of venous blood were collected and sent to the laboratory and immunology department of Union Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, before intubation, and five tests including blood routine, coagulation, liver function, kidney function, electrolytes, C-reactive protein, myocardial enzyme, BNP, lymphocyte subsets and cytokines were performed.

If the adverse events of esketamine appear during the study, patients or authorized client withdraw from the study actively, or drugs that seriously affect systemic inflammation and immune function (such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, immunosuppressants, immunoenhancers, high doses of hormones (more than 10mg prednisolone per day or equivalent dose of other hormones, etc.) were used in clinical treatment, the study will be terminated. In this study, adverse reactions were evaluated daily after inclusion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430022
        • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥ 18 years old without restriction of gender, race, religion, creed or nationality;
  • No use of sedatives within the half-life of their elimination before inclusion;
  • Patients and/or their family members know and agree to participate in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years,Allergy to esketamine or midazolam;
  • Endotracheal tract required intubation without notsedative drugs, such as cardiac arrest、neurologic dysfunction or the need for awake intubation
  • Patients with suspected elevated intracranial pressure;
  • Bradycardia (heartrate (HR) less than 50 beats / min) or atrioventricular block;
  • Untreated or undertreated hyperthyroid patients;
  • Chronic kidney disease;
  • Severe chronic liver disease (child-Pugh: Grade C);
  • Alcohol or opioid dependence, mental illness, or severe cognitive impairment;
  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Lack of informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Esketamine intubation group
Esketamine at 0.5-1.0 mg/kg BW and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg BW was given intravenously for induction intubation. After the intubation was completed, sufentanil citrate (0.08-0.15 μg/kg/h) combined with remimazolam besylate (0.15-0.25 mg/kg/h) was administered intravenously to sustain a Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) score 0 and a Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -3 and 0 following intubation.
Esketamine at 0.5-1.0 mg/kg BW and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg BW was given intravenously for induction intubation. After the intubation was completed, esketamine was continuously pumped at 0.3-1.5 mg/kg/h to maintain sedation.
Other Names:
  • (S)-ketamine
Placebo Comparator: Conventional intubation group
Midazolam at 0.1mg/kg BW, fentanyl at 1ug/kg BW, rocuronium bromide at 0.6mg/kg BW was given intravenously for induction intubation; After the intubation was completed, sufentanil citrate (0.08-0.15 μg/kg/h) combined with remimazolam besylate (0.15-0.25 mg/kg/h) was administered intravenously to sustain a Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) score 0 and a Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -3 and 0 following intubation.
Midazolam at 0.1mg/kg BW, fentanyl at 1ug/kg BW, rocuronium bromide at 0.6mg/kg BW was given intravenously for induction intubation; After the intubation was completed, sufentanil at 0.1 μg/kg/h was administered for analgesia, and remazolam tosylate at an initial dose of 0.075 mg/kg/h was administered for sedation, and the dose of remazolam tosylate was adjusted according to the RASS score.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Arterial Pressure Before, During, and After Tracheal Intubation
Time Frame: From 5 minutes before induction through 60 minutes after tracheal intubation.
Mean arterial pressure was recorded before induction, during induction, during intubation, and at 1, 5, 10, 30, and 60 minutes after tracheal intubation.
From 5 minutes before induction through 60 minutes after tracheal intubation.
Heart Rate Before, During, and After Tracheal Intubation
Time Frame: From 5 minutes before induction through 60 minutes after tracheal intubation.
Heart rate was recorded before induction, during induction, during intubation, and at 1, 5, 10, 30, and 60 minutes after tracheal intubation.
From 5 minutes before induction through 60 minutes after tracheal intubation.
Peripheral Oxygen Saturation Before, During, and After Tracheal Intubation
Time Frame: From 5 minutes before induction through 60 minutes after tracheal intubation.
Peripheral oxygen saturation was recorded before induction, during induction, during intubation, and at 1, 5, 10, 30, and 60 minutes after tracheal intubation.
From 5 minutes before induction through 60 minutes after tracheal intubation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Norepinephrine Infusion Dose During Induction and Within 1 Hour After Intubation
Time Frame: From induction through 1 hour after tracheal intubation.
Norepinephrine infusion dose was summarized for each participant over the interval from induction through 1 hour after tracheal intubation. The reported value represents the participant-level average infusion rate during this interval.
From induction through 1 hour after tracheal intubation.
Duration of Invasive Ventilator Support
Time Frame: From inclusion until discontinuation of invasive ventilator support.
Duration of invasive ventilator support was measured from inclusion until discontinuation of invasive ventilator support.
From inclusion until discontinuation of invasive ventilator support.
Length of Intensive Care Unit Stay
Time Frame: From inclusion until discharge from the intensive care unit, assessed up to 28 days after inclusion.
Length of intensive care unit stay was measured from inclusion until discharge from the intensive care unit.
From inclusion until discharge from the intensive care unit, assessed up to 28 days after inclusion.
Number of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days After Inclusion
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after inclusion.
Mortality was assessed within 28 days after inclusion.
Up to 28 days after inclusion.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jiancheng Zhang, MD, PhD, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 27, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After publication, the data supporting the findings of this study can be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Participant data without names and identifiers can be provided by the corresponding author and the Wuhan Union Hospital after approval. The research team will provide an email address for communication purposes once approval is obtained regarding sharing the data with others. The proposal with detailed description of the study objectives and statistical analysis plan will be needed for evaluation of the purpose for the data request. Additional materials may also be required during the process of evaluation.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Six months after publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe