Remote Care in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis (NOR-Flare)

November 3, 2022 updated by: Anne Therese Tveter, Diakonhjemmet Hospital

Can Machine Learning and Patient-reported Outcomes be Used in Remote Care in People With Rheumatic Diseases

This study is a 24-months, non-inferiority randomized, controlled trial with two parallel arms to determine if a new follow-up strategy for patients with RA is non-inferior in maintaining comprehensive disease control measured as simultaneous maintenance of structural, functional and clinical treatment target at 2-year follow-up compared to the conventional follow-up regimen with regular hospital visits.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The study will include Norwegian adult males and females with rheumatoid arthritis. Eligible patients that consent to participation will be randomized to two groups:

  • Control group: conventional follow-up strategy with blood tests, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and pre-scheduled visits at the hospital every 6th month.
  • Remote monitoring: monthly remote monitoring of PROs and triage of patients using an algorithm will guide healthcare providers in scheduling patients for a video consultation or face-to-face hospital visits.

Participants will be followed for 24 months. Primary outcome is proportionn maintaining comprehensive disease control measured as simultaneous maintenance of structural, functional and clinical treatment target at 2-year follow-up1.

  • Structural: Assessed with radiographs of hands and feet according to the van der Heijde modified Sharpe score (subscores for erosions (0-280) and joint space narrowing (0-168)), with a total range of 0-448. Maintenance of structural treatment target is defined as change in total score <1 unit/year (<2 units from inclusion to 2-year follow-up).
  • Functional: Measured by Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) measured on a scale from 0.00 to 3.00, where a change of 0.25 is considered clinical important3. Maintenance of functional treatment target is defined as a worsening <0.25 from inclusion to 2-year follow-up.
  • Clinical: Measured by DAS28, categorized into remission (<2.6), low disease activity (2.6 to ≤3.2), moderate disease activity (3.2 to ≤5.1) and high disease activity (>5.1). Maintenance of clinical treatment target is defined disease activity category at 2-year follow-up ≤ baseline category.

We will use a 15% non-inferiority margin.

The study will comprise an internal pilot study the first 6 months for all participants in the intervention group.

The study will also include qualitative research including semi-structured interviews and observations of patients in the intervention group and health professionals involved in the study. The interviews will explore experiences with remote monitoring and video consultations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

228

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or non-pregnant, non-nursing female ≥18 years of age at screening
  • Patients with a diagnosis of RA who fulfil the 2010 ACR/EULAR diagnostic criteria24 (see Appendix 5, 10.4)
  • Medical treatment with cs/ts/bDMARDs (incl. prednisolone) considered stable by the healthcare provider the last 6 months
  • Low disease activity or remission (CDAI<10 / DAS28<3.2) at inclusion
  • <2 swollen joints
  • Not deemed inappropriate for remote monitoring by the healthcare provider
  • Capable of understanding and signing an informed consent form
  • Access to a smartphone or tablet
  • Able to speak and understand Norwegian language

Exclusion Criteria:

Medical conditions:

  • Major co-morbidities, such as severe malignancies, severe diabetes mellitus, severe infections, uncontrollable hypertension, severe cardiovascular disease (NYHA class III or IV), severe respiratory diseases, and/or cirrhosis.
  • Indications of active tuberculosis (TB)
  • Treated with intravenous DMARD (e.g., rituximab and infliximab)

Diagnostic assessments:

  • Abnormal renal function, defined as serum creatinine >142 µmol/L in female and >168 µmol/L in male, or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <40 mL/min/1.73 m2
  • Abnormal liver function (defined as Aspartate Transaminate (AST)/Alanine Transaminase (ALT) >3 x upper normal limit), active or recent hepatitis
  • Leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia

Other:

  • Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding (current at screening or planned within the duration of the study)
  • Severe psychiatric or mental disorders, alcohol abuse or other substance abuse, language barriers or other factors which makes adherence to the study protocol impossible.
  • Deemed unsuitable for remote monitoring by medical doctor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional follow-up
Conventional follow-up strategy with blood tests and face-to-face visits at the hospital every 6 months
Patients in the conventional/usual care arm will be treated according to current conventional follow-up regimen with PROs, blood tests, and face-to-face visits with an experienced nurse or a rheumatologist every 6 months. They can contact the hospital if they are experience worsening of their disease.
Other Names:
  • Control group
EXPERIMENTAL: Remote monitoring
Monthly remote monitoring of patient-reported outcomes and triage of patients using an algorithm will guide healthcare providers in scheduling patients for a video consultation or face-to-face hospital visits.

The patients in the remote monitoring arm will use a web-app (Youwell) for self-reporting patient reported outcomes (PROs) and CRP/ESR, displaying results for PROs over time, and for synchronous (video) or asynchronous (chat) communication with healthcare providers. The patients will receive a SMS reminder for "tasks" (e.g., self-reporting PROs or registering results from blood tests) every month.

A study coordinator/nurse will monitor the PROs and blood test (CRP/ESR) results, and respond to chat messages. Based on the algorithm, a triaging functionality in the Youwell platform will aid healthcare providers in highlighting which patients needs attention.

Other Names:
  • Intervention group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion maintaining comprehensive disease control
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years

Comprehensive disease control measured as simultaneous maintenance of structural, functional and clinical treatment target at 2-year follow-up.

  • Structural: Radiographs of hands and feet according to the van der Heijde modified Sharpe score, with a total range of 0-448. Maintenance of structural treatment target is defined as change in total score <1 unit/year (<2 units from inclusion to 2-year follow-up).
  • Functional: Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) measured on a scale from 0.00 to 3.00, where a change of 0.25 is considered clinical important. Maintenance of functional treatment target is defined as a worsening <0.25 from inclusion to 2-year follow-up.
  • Clinical: DAS28, categorized into remission (<2.6), low disease activity (2.6 to ≤3.2), moderate disease activity (3.2 to ≤5.1) and high disease activity (>5.1). Maintenance of clinical treatment target is defined disease activity category at 2-year follow-up ≤ baseline category.
Baseline and 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in joint damage progression
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years
Joint damage progression from inclusion to 2-year follow-up assessed with radiographs of hands and feet according to the van der Heijde modified Sharpe score (subscores for erosions (0-280) and joint space narrowing (0-168)), with a total range of 0-448. Measured as a continuous variable.
Baseline and 2 years
Self-reported disease activity (intervention group)
Time Frame: Monthly until 2 years
Measured with patient global assessment of disease activity (0-10 scale, 0=no disease activity), estimated as change across all timepoints
Monthly until 2 years
Self-reported disease activity (control group)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 2 years
Measured with patient global assessment of disease activity (0-10 scale, 0=no disease activity), estimated as change across all timepoints
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 2 years
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 2 years
Measured with EQ5D-5L, 5 questions used to calculate an utility score (0-1, 1= best health), assessed as a total score across all timepoints
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 2 years
Proportion in remission/low disease activity (CDAI)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years
Measured with CDAI (patient global assessment of disease activity, number of tender and swollen joints, physician assessment of disease activity). Remission/low disease activity defined as CDAI <10.
Baseline and 2 years
Proportion in remission/low disease activity (DAS28)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years
Measured with DAS28 (patient global assessment of disease activity, CRP/ESR, number of tender and swollen joints). Remission/low disease activity defined as DAS28 <3.2.
Baseline and 2 years
Disease activity in conjunction with consultation (DAS28)
Time Frame: Any consultation from baseline to 2 years

Measured with DAS28 (patient global assessment of disease activity, CRP/ESR, number of tender and swollen joints).

DAS28 score: <2.6= remission; 2.6-<3.2=low disease activity; 3.2 -5.1= moderate disease activity; >5.2= high disease activity

Any consultation from baseline to 2 years
Disease activity in conjunction with consultation (CDAI)
Time Frame: Any consultation from baseline to 2 years

Measured with CDAI (patient global assessment of disease activity, number of tender and swollen joints, physician assessment of disease activity).

CDAI score: <=2.8 = remission; >2.8 - <=10 = low disease activity; >10 - <=22 = moderate disease activity; >22 = high disease activity

Any consultation from baseline to 2 years
Health care utilization
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Costs related to self-reported healthcare use in primary and secondary health care. Patients will be asked if they have been seeking healthcare (yes/no), if yes, they will be asked to specify type of healthcare use and time used. This information will also be collected from national register data.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Patient-reported disease flares (intervention group)
Time Frame: Every month until 2 years
Patient-reported experience of a significant worsening of symptoms (reflecting a flare in disease activity), response options: no, yes, uncertain. If yes or uncertain, they will be asked which date the flare occurred and the number of days it lasted.
Every month until 2 years
Patient-reported disease flares (control group)
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Patient-reported experience of a significant worsening of symptoms (reflecting a flare in disease activity), response options: no, yes, uncertain. If yes or uncertain, they will be asked which date the flare occurred and the number of days it lasted.
6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Adverse events
Time Frame: Through study completion, maximum 2 years
Number of adverse events, serious adverse events, and withdrawals because of adverse events.
Through study completion, maximum 2 years
Number of consultations/contacts at the hospital
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 years
Reported by research nurse or study doctor when in contact with a patient.
From baseline to 2 years
Activity impairment (intervention group)
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly until 2 years
Item no.6 from Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): self-reported activity impairment on a NRS 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
Baseline and monthly until 2 years
Activity impairment (control group)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Item no.6 from Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): self-reported activity impairment on a NRS 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Costs related to hospital visits
Time Frame: Baseline
Self-reported travel distance (km and time) and way of transport (walking, bicycle, privat car, public transportation, taxi, airplane, other) in conjunction with consultation at the hospital
Baseline
The need to take time off for hospital visits or video consultation
Time Frame: Baseline
If in paid work, the need to take time off from work is indicated as yes or no.
Baseline
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (intervention group)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 months and 2 years
Blood test at hospital or general practitioner
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 months and 2 years
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (control group)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 2 years
Blood test at hospital or general practitioner
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 2 years
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (intervention group)
Time Frame: Monthly until 2 years
Blood test measured at home in a subgroup among the intervention group
Monthly until 2 years
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
8 question concerning physical function, scored from 0 (no problems) to 3 (impossible to perform)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
PROMIS Physical function
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
4 questions concerning physical function measured on a 5 point Likert scale
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Pain (intervention group)
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly until 2 years
Self-reported pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no pain; 10=worst possible pain)
Baseline and monthly until 2 years
Pain (control group)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Self-reported pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no pain; 10=worst possible pain)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Joint pain (intervention group)
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly until 2 years
Self-reported joint pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no joint pain; 10=worst possible joint pain)
Baseline and monthly until 2 years
Joint pain (control group)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Self-reported joint pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no joint pain; 10=worst possible joint pain)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Sleep impairment
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
1 item from Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, self-reported sleep impairment in last month due to pain with 4 response categories ranging "Not during the past month" to "Three or more times a week" ; higher value indicate worse outcome.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Medication use
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Medication, contomitant medication and any change in medication during the study period
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Swollen joint count
Time Frame: Baseline, any hospital visits, 2 years
Physician count of swollen joints; MCP 1-5, PIP 1-5, wrist, elbows, shoulders, ankles, MTP 1-5, at regular visits, extra visits, withdrawls, early discontinuation
Baseline, any hospital visits, 2 years
Tender joint count
Time Frame: Baseline, any hospital visits, 2 years
Physician count of tender joints; MCP 1-5, PIP 1-5, wrist, elbows, shoulders, ankles, MTP 1-5, at regular visits, extra visits, withdrawls, early discontinuation
Baseline, any hospital visits, 2 years
Extra visits, telephone and video consultations
Time Frame: Through study completion, maximum 2 years
Number of extra visits to the hospital or video consultations with a healthcare provider
Through study completion, maximum 2 years
Withdrawals/early discontinuation
Time Frame: Through study completion, maximum 2 years
Number of withdrawals/early discontinuation
Through study completion, maximum 2 years
Physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
3 questions assessing frequency, intensity and duration of physical activity last week
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Fatigue last week measured on an 11-point NRS (0=no fatigue, 10=worst possible fatigue)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Patient acceptable symptom state
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
one question assessing the patient acceptable symptom state last week, 5 response options from very good to very bad.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
eHealth literacy
Time Frame: Baseline
eHEALS questionnaire, 9 items measured on a 5 point Likert scale, with higher score indicating better health literacy
Baseline
Patient-reported self-efficacy for using different digital devices, secure login and digital health services
Time Frame: Baseline
Self-efficacy/confidence in using smartphone, tablet, computer, app's, secure login and digital health services. 6 items with Likert scale response categories: Never used, Very bad, Bad, Neither good nor bad, Good, Very good. Score range 1-5; higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
Baseline
Patient satisfaction with care
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 year
1 item with five point response options ranging from "Very satisfied" to "Very dissatisfied", higher value indicate better outcome
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 year
Patient satisfaction with remote monitoring
Time Frame: 2 years
Telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ) 21 items scored from 1-7, higher score indicate higher satisfaction with telehealth
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 29, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 14, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data sharing of anonymous data may be possible upon reasonable request sent to the principal investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Conventional follow-up

3
Subscribe