- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05541016
De-Escalated Adjuvant and Definitive Radiation Therapy Informed by DART 2.0 ctHPV-DNA
DART 2.0: ctHPV-DNA Informed De-Escalated Adjuvant and Definitive Radiation Therapy
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
- Clinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8
- Stage III Oropharyngeal (p16-Negative) Carcinoma AJCC v8
- Clinical Stage I HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8
- Clinical Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8
- Stage II Oropharyngeal (p16-Negative) Carcinoma AJCC v8
- Stage I Oropharyngeal (p16-Negative) Carcinoma AJCC v8
- Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Intervention / Treatment
- Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
- Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Drug: Cisplatin
- Drug: Docetaxel
- Radiation: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
- Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography
- Procedure: Computed Tomography
- Procedure: Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy
- Radiation: Diffusing Alpha-emitter Radiation Therapy
- Other: Questionnaire
- Procedure: Modified Barium Swallow Study
- Procedure: Biospecimen Collection
- Other: Observation Activity
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To prospectively incorporate circulating tumor human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid (ctHPVDNA) in combination with clinical and pathologic factors to appropriately select patients for treatment intensity.
II. To demonstrate patients traditionally offered adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) but at low risk of treatment failure based on clinical pathologic and post op ctHPVDNA risk factors have an acceptable 1-year progression free survival (PFS) warranting further study. (Favorable Intermediate Risk [GROUP 1]) III. To demonstrate based on clinical, pathologic, and ctHPVDNA risk factors a select population receiving diffusing alpha-emitter radiation therapy (DART) (+ multiple segment radiation therapy [MSRT] where applicable) is associated with acceptable 2 year PFS. (Unfavorable Intermediate Risk [GROUP 2]) IV. To quantify the rate of recurrence as defined by the 2 year PFS in an identified high risk population using the incorporation of ctHPVDNA. (High Risk [GROUP 3]) V. To prospectively use week 4 ctHPVDNA to guide treatment intensity of 56 versus (vs) 70 Gy with concurrent cisplatin to demonstrate 56 Gy with sufficient ctHPVDNA clearance results in an acceptable 2 year PFS. (Chemoradiation Cohort [GROUP 4])
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare PFS by treatment arm including at landmark timepoints II. To assess the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients that are disease-free post-treatment.
III. To compare overall survival (OS) by treatment arm including at landmark timepoints.
IV. To compare patient reported outcomes (PROS) by treatment arm and modality. V. To evaluate treatment toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria as rated by providers across treatment arms.
VI. To define patterns of recurrence by treatment arm. VII. To describe salvage therapy by treatment arm, including the rate, type, and success of salvage treatment.
VIII. To compare functional outcomes by treatment arm based on modified barium swallow study (MBSS) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) by treatment arm.
IX. To return to work parameters by treatment arm as assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI).
X. To quantify the costs of return visits for surveillance. XI. To assess end of treatment ctHPVDNA detectability and its association with PFS by comparing patients with detectable versus undetectable end of treatment ctHPVDNA within treatment arms.
XII. To compare outcomes by institution. XIII. To evaluate rates of post operative bleeding, tracheostomy, and readmission with 6 weeks of resection.
XIV. To compare methods of surveillance in diagnosis of recurrence including clinical evaluation, ctHPVDNA testing, and imaging.
XV. To investigate the impact of tobacco and smoking history on recurrence, PFS, and OS.
XVI. To perform a matched analysis of patients by clinical and pathologic risk factors to MC1273, MC1675, and MC Mucosal Sparing (NCT02736786).
CORRELATIVE RESEARCH OBJECTIVES:
I. Will investigate post-op Day 1 or 2 ctHPVDNA detectability as a surrogate for detectability for later post-op timepoints including risk of recurrence rates.
II. Will analyze salivary samples pre-treatment, post-op, and at the time of recurrence to determine whether salivary ctHPVDNA may further inform recurrence risk and surveillance in HPV(+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).
III. Will characterize post-operative drain fluid and compare rates of detectability to blood and saliva in order with the aim to determine whether the regional drain represents a separate regional compartment for analysis.
IV. Will prospectively quantify pretreatment imaging for number of involved nodes, radiographic extranodal extension (rENE) as it relates to pathologic findings and risk of recurrence.
V. Will analyze within category of low intermediate, high intermediate, and high-risk patients the percentage of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and association with recurrence as well as differences across treatment groups.
VI. Will assess whether HPV is integrated vs episomal for each patient and the relationship of ctHPVDNA detectability and outcomes.
VII. Will investigate molecular markers on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) from primary surgical specimens.
OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 4 groups.
GROUP I: Patients undergo observation following standard of care surgery. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-operative (pre-op), 2 weeks post-operative (post-op), and 3 months follow-up. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months as well as saliva sample collection at pre-op, end of RT, and any clinical recurrence.
GROUP II: Patients undergo DART with/without mucosal sparing twice daily (BID) on days 1-12 Monday-Friday for a total of 20 fractions within 8 weeks of standard of care surgery. Patients receive concurrent docetaxel intravenously (IV) over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 (Mondays preferred). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3 and 12 months post-treatment. Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, end of RT, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months as well as saliva sample collection at pre-op, end of RT, and any clinical recurrence.
GROUP III: Patients undergo intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) once daily (QD) on days 1-40 Monday-Friday for a total of 30 fractions within 6 weeks of standard of care surgery. Depending on risk status, patients may also receive concurrent cisplatin IV over 1-2 hours once a week (QW) on Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday or once every 3 weeks for 6 doses (or accepted alternate regimen when drug shortage applies per physician discretion). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, post-op, and 3 and 12 months post-treatment. Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, end of RT, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months as well as saliva sample collection at pre-op, end of RT, and any clinical recurrence.
GROUP IV: Patients undergo IMRT or IMPT therapy QD on days 1-40 Monday-Friday for 28 or 35 fractions based on biomarker response along with concurrent cisplatin IV over 1-2 hours QW on Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday or once every 3 weeks for 6 doses (or accepted alternate regimen when drug shortage applies per physician discretion). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS prior to RT and at 3 and 12 months post RT. Patients undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing pre-RT, 4 weeks into RT, anticipated fraction 20, end of RT, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months as well as saliva sample collection at prior to RT, at the end of RT, at any clinical recurrence.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 4-6 weeks post treatment, every 3 months post-treatment for 2 years, every 6 months for year 3, and annually for years 4 and 5.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Clinical Trials Referral Office
- Phone Number: 855-776-0015
- Email: mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
- Recruiting
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona
-
Principal Investigator:
- Samir H. Patel, M.D.
-
Contact:
- Clinical Trials Referral Office
- Phone Number: 855-776-0015
- Email: mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu
-
Contact:
- Shelby Watkin
- Phone Number: 480-342-2000
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224-9980
- Recruiting
- Mayo Clinic in Florida
-
Contact:
- Clinical Trials Referral Office
- Phone Number: 855-776-0015
- Email: mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Adam L. Holtzman, M.D.
-
Contact:
- Caroline Pamboukas
- Phone Number: 904-953-2791
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Recruiting
- Mayo Clinic in Rochester
-
Principal Investigator:
- David M. Routman, M.D.
-
Contact:
- Clinical Trials Referral Office
- Phone Number: 855-776-0015
- Email: mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- PRE-REGISTRATION (optional): Provide written informed consent
- Age >= 18 years
- Histological confirmation of squamous cell carcinoma originating from or suspected to be originating from the oropharynx
- Plan for gross total surgical resection via trans oral surgery with curative intent and at least unilateral neck dissection OR chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin. Note: The patient must be cisplatin eligible even if an alternate is used due to drug shortage
- Absence of distant metastases on standard diagnostic work-up =< 16 weeks prior to registration. (Chest CT or PET/CT)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) =< 1
- Negative pregnancy test done =< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only
- Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance
- Provide written informed consent
- Willing to return to enrolling institution for follow-up (during the active monitoring phase of the study)
- Willing to provide blood samples for correlative research purposes, including anonymous shipment of samples to for NavDx testing
Exclusion Criteria:
Any of the following:
- Pregnant women
- Nursing women
- Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception
- Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens
- Immunocompromised patients and patients known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)+
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
- Receiving any other investigational agent which would be considered as a treatment for the primary neoplasm
- Other active malignancy =< 5 years prior to registration. EXCEPTIONS: Nonmelanotic skin cancer or carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix, or prostate or localized endometrioid endometrial cancer. NOTE: If there is a history or prior malignancy, they must not be receiving other specific treatment for their cancer
- Prior history of radiation therapy to the affected site
- Prior systemic chemotherapy in the last 5 years
- Contraindication to radiation therapy as determined by the treating team
- History of allergic reaction to docetaxel
- Receiving any medications or substances which in the opinion of the investigators would interfere with treatment. Examples could include strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) at oncologist discretion
- Severe pre-existing ototoxicity or neuropathy that would, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude the use of cisplatin chemotherapy
cT4 primary tumor
- NOTE: Patients with no intermediate risk factors after surgery, low risk patients, as defined by T1, T2, tumors with lymph node less than 3cm, no intermediate or high-risk factors such as lymphatic invasion (LVSI), extranodal extension (ENE), perineural invasion (PNI), positive margin, will be withdrawn from study and be observed per current clinical standard of care. Patients found to be both HPV negative and p16 negative will be withdrawn from study.
- Patients found to have HPV non 16 type, or HPV detectability in blood less than <20tumor tissue modified viral (TTMV) will not be candidates for de-escalation in Groups 1 and 2 and will be treated in Group 3 unless otherwise meeting criteria for low risk. They will receive 60 Gy +/- cisplatin or acceptable alternate regimen when drug shortages of cisplatin exist. If treated primarily with chemoradiation (chemoRT) (Group 4), these patients will not be candidates for de-escalation if TTMV is < 50 TTMV but can remain on study receiving 70 Gy with all corresponding correlative studies applying
- Patients with unknown (radiologic/clinically occult) primaries but neck adenopathy suspected to be HPV associated oropharyngeal carcinoma can be registered to go on study for Groups 1-3. Should after primary resection, no primary tumor be identified, the patient will be withdrawn from study and be treated per institutional standard of care. Group 4 patients must have an identifiable (clinically or radiologically apparent) primary tumor
- All treatment primarily, including surgery and chemotherapy will be performed at the enrolling institution
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group 1 (observation)
Patients undergo observation following standard of care surgery.
Patients undergo modified barium swallow study (MBSS) at pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3 months follow-up.
Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or magnetic MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment.
Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months as well as saliva sample collection at pre-op, end of RT, and any clinical recurrence.
|
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Undergo MRI
Other Names:
Undergo PET scan
Other Names:
Undergo CT scan
Other Names:
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Undergo MBSS
Other Names:
Undergo blood and saliva specimen collection for NavDx testing
Other Names:
Undergo observation
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Group 2 (DART, docetaxel)
Patients undergo DART with/without mucosal sparing BID on days 1-12 Monday-Friday for a total of 20 fractions within 8 weeks of standard of care surgery.
Patients receive concurrent docetaxel IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 (Mondays preferred).
Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3 and 12 months post-treatment.
Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment.
Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, end of RT, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months as well as saliva sample collection at pre-op, end of RT, and any clinical recurrence.
|
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Undergo MRI
Other Names:
Given IV
Other Names:
Undergo PET scan
Other Names:
Undergo CT scan
Other Names:
Undergo DART
Other Names:
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Undergo MBSS
Other Names:
Undergo blood and saliva specimen collection for NavDx testing
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Group 3 (IMRT/IMPT, with/without cisplatin)
Patients undergo IMRT or IMPT QD on days 1-40 Monday-Friday for a total of 30 fractions within 6 weeks of standard of care surgery.
Depending on risk status, patients may also receive concurrent cisplatin IV over 1-2 hours once a week QW on Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday or once every 3 weeks for 6 doses (or accepted alternate regimen when drug shortage applies per physician discretion).
Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3 and 12 months post-treatment.
Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment.
Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, end of RT, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months as well as saliva sample collection at pre-op, end of RT, and any clinical recurrence.
|
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Undergo MRI
Other Names:
Given IV
Other Names:
Undergo IMRT
Other Names:
Undergo PET scan
Other Names:
Undergo CT scan
Other Names:
Undergo IMPT
Other Names:
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Undergo MBSS
Other Names:
Undergo blood and saliva specimen collection for NavDx testing
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Group 4 (IMRT/IMPT, cisplatin)
Patients undergo IMRT or IMPT therapy QD on days 1-40 Monday-Friday for 28 or 35 fractions based on biomarker response along with concurrent cisplatin IV over 1-2 hours QW on Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday or once every 3 weeks for 6 doses (or accepted alternate regimen when drug shortage applies per physician discretion).
Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients undergo MBSS prior to RT and at 3 and 12 months post RT.
Patients undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment.
Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing pre-RT, 4 weeks into RT, anticipated fraction 20, end of RT, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months as well as saliva sample collection at pre-op, end of RT, and any clinical recurrence.
|
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Undergo MRI
Other Names:
Given IV
Other Names:
Undergo IMRT
Other Names:
Undergo PET scan
Other Names:
Undergo CT scan
Other Names:
Undergo IMPT
Other Names:
Undergo MBSS
Other Names:
Undergo blood and saliva specimen collection for NavDx testing
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From registration to the first of either disease progression/recurrence or death, assessed up to 5 years
|
Progression-free survival (PFS), the time from treatment initiation until disease progression or worsening.
PFS at specific timepoints will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
|
From registration to the first of either disease progression/recurrence or death, assessed up to 5 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Patterns of recurrence and rate of salvage therapy for Low Intermediate Risk (GROUP 1) and multiple segment radiation therapy (MSRT) + de-escalated adjuvant radiation therapy (DART)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Costs of return visits for surveillance
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Presented descriptively and ANOVA models with tukey's adjustment for pairwise comparison will be utilized to test difference in arms.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Assessment of surveillance circulating human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid (ctHPVDNA) preceding clinical or radiologic detection of recurrence
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Matched analysis of patients by clinical and pathologic risk factor to MC1273 and MC1675 de-escalation arms to overall GROUP 1 and GROUP 2 cohorts including 2-year PFS
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Functional outcomes of DART alone vs. DART + MSRT
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Feasibility of DART regimen outside of Mayo Clinic
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Progression-free survival (PFS) follow-up
Time Frame: At years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
|
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from treatment initiation until disease progression or worsening.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response versus (vs.) no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
At years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
|
|
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: From time of surgery and also from end of all treatment across all the groups, assessed up to 5 years
|
Disease-free survival (DFS) is the measure of time after treatment during which no sign of cancer is found.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
From time of surgery and also from end of all treatment across all the groups, assessed up to 5 years
|
|
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: At years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
|
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the duration of patient survival from the time of treatment initiation.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
At years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
|
|
Patient reported outcomes (PROs)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Functional outcomes - PROs
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Measure by patient reported outcomes (PROs).
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Proton vs photon treatment toxicity - PROs
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Assessed by PROs.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Proton vs photon treatment toxicity - MBSS
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Assessed by MBSS.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Proton vs photon treatment toxicity - dosimetric differences
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Assessed by dosimetric differences including to organs at risk and the primary tumor bed in the case of mucosal sparing.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Evaluation of end of treatment treatment circulating human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid (ctHPVDNA) detectability as a marker of risk of progression
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Functional outcomes - modified barium swallow study (MBSS)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Measured by modified barium swallow (MBSS).
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Evaluation of return to work
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Will be assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI).
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
ctHPVDNA detectability
Time Frame: At post-operative day 1 or 2
|
Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
At post-operative day 1 or 2
|
|
Characterization of post-operative drain fluid
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
We will characterize post-operative drain fluid and compare rates of detectability to blood and saliva in order with the aim to determine whether the regional drain represents a separate regional compartment for analysis.
Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Quantification of pre-treatment imaging
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
We will prospectively quantify pretreatment imaging for number of involved nodes, radiographic extranodal extension as it relates to pathologic findings and risk of recurrence.
Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Percentage of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
We will analyze within category of low intermediate, high intermediate, and high-risk patients the percentage of TILs and association with recurrence as well as differences across treatment groups.
Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Assessment of integrated vs episomal HPV
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Comparison of methods of surveillance as defined by the date of diagnosis of recurrence by ctHPVDNA testing as compared to clinical examination and imaging.
Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of each will be reported.
Measure whether HPV is integrated vs episomal for each patient and the relationship of ctHPVDNA detectability and outcomes.
These analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Assess Molecular Markers Using FFPE
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
We will investigate molecular markers on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) from primary surgical specimens.
Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
|
Salivary ctHPVDNA analysis for recurrence risk and surveillance
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Salivary samples will be analyzed pre-treatment, post-op, and at the time of recurrence to determine whether salivary ctHPVDNA may further inform recurrence risk and surveillance in HPV(+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature.
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.).
For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used.
For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test.
For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e.
response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
|
Up to 5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David M, Routman, M.D., Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Stomatognathic Diseases
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases
- Pharyngeal Neoplasms
- Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms
- Pharyngeal Diseases
- Carcinoma
- Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
- Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
- Organic Chemicals
- Investigative Techniques
- Epidemiologic Methods
- Methods
- Therapeutics
- Clinical Laboratory Techniques
- Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
- Diagnosis
- Hydrocarbons
- Cycloparaffins
- Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic
- Hydrocarbons, Cyclic
- Terpenes
- Data Collection
- Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms
- Quality of Health Care
- Public Health
- Environment and Public Health
- Inorganic Chemicals
- Chlorine Compounds
- Nitrogen Compounds
- Taxoids
- Cyclodecanes
- Diterpenes
- Elements
- Metals
- Chemistry Techniques, Analytical
- Spectrum Analysis
- Metals, Heavy
- Platinum Compounds
- Radiotherapy
- Transition Elements
- Radiotherapy, Conformal
- Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted
- Docetaxel
- Cisplatin
- 1,2-diaminocyclohexaneplatinum II citrate
- Observation
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Specimen Handling
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
- Platinum
- Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Other Study ID Numbers
- GMROR2271
- 22-004443 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic in Rochester)
- DART 2.0 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic in Rochester)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Clinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8
-
Jonathan Schoenfeld, MD, MPHNaverisRecruitingHPV Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Clinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage I HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedClinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage I HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage I HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive)... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterAstraZenecaTerminatedOropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Clinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage I HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Pathologic... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnClinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage III Oropharyngeal (p16-Negative) Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingClinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage I HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Oropharyngeal Human Papillomavirus-Positive Squamous...United States
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterEli Lilly and CompanyTerminatedClinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IV HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage IV HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive)... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruitingClinical Stage I HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8United States
-
NRG OncologyNot yet recruitingHead and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Clinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage III Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage III Laryngeal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Lip and Oral Cavity Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Oropharyngeal (p16-Negative) Carcinoma... and other conditions
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingClinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8United States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingClinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage III Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage III Laryngeal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Oropharyngeal (p16-Negative) Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage IV Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage IV Laryngeal Cancer... and other conditionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment
-
Gynecologic Oncology GroupNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedOvarian Clear Cell Cystadenocarcinoma | Ovarian Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma | Ovarian Seromucinous Carcinoma | Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma | Stage IV Ovarian Germ Cell Tumor | Ovarian Sarcoma | Malignant Ovarian Epithelial Tumor | Ovarian Carcinosarcoma | Ovarian Brenner Tumor | Ovarian Mucinous... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedUnspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific | Malignant NeoplasmUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesWithdrawnLung Metastases | Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Malignant Mesothelioma | Advanced Malignant Mesothelioma
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingMonoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance | Smoldering Plasma Cell MyelomaUnited States
-
Kantonsspital AarauRecruiting
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterWithdrawnInfiltrating Bladder Urothelial CarcinomaUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedBreast CarcinomaUnited States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingUnspecified Adult Solid Tumor | Tumors Metastatic to BrainUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Recruiting
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingHematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm | Malignant Solid Neoplasm | COVID-19 InfectionUnited States