- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05545228
The Mouth Matters in Mental Health Study
A Randomised Feasibility Trial of an Intervention Using Mental Health Support Workers as Link Workers to Improve Dental Visiting in People With Severe Mental Illness: The Mouth in Mind Study
To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a link work intervention to increase planned dental care visits for patients with severe mental illness, and through this to improve their oral health.
- To understand what constitutes best practice when delivering link work around dental visiting.
- To identify what training needs exist for support workers around link work.
- To determine whether patients with SMI are willing to be randomised to a trial targeting dental visiting.
- To understand whether it is feasible to collect clinical outcome and planned dental appointment data in this population.
- To explore if, and how, patients with severe mental illness engage with a link work intervention.
- To understand the potential factors impacting (e.g. facilitators and barriers) acceptability and delivery.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background and study aims
Severe mental ill health (SMI) affects around 1% of the population. It includes depression, psychosis, and bipolar disorder. People with experience of SMI are more likely to have problems with their teeth and gums. This includes more missing, filled, and decayed teeth than people without SMI. Having poor oral health can impact a lot of everyday activities like eating, speaking and smiling. It can affect how patients see themselves and their mental health.
Dentists can treat many early teeth and gum problems. However, very few people with SMI attend regular dental appointments. Instead, they are more likely to seek help when in crisis and invasive treatments are the only option. Accessing a dentist for people with SMI can be difficult for lots of reasons. People can feel helpless, fearful, or unmotivated to attend. They can have difficulty booking, planning, and getting to appointments. They may struggle to pay for or access free dental care. Unfortunately, existing dental initiatives have not addressed the barriers facing this group. They do not help people with SMI to attend the dentist.
The investigators want to help people with SMI to access dental care. The study will use mental health support workers who are already working in the National Health Service (NHS). They will link people receiving care from mental health teams with dental services. The support workers will help people to book, plan, and attend regular dental appointments. They will support patients to apply for financial support. People call this type of support link work. Research has indicated that link work can increase dental visits in people who might not normally attend. Mental health support workers already do link work for other appointments. Link work has been used to help other vulnerable groups of people (e.g. children) around dental care. However, this will be the first use of link work to help people with SMI to attend the dentist.
Who can participate?
People with a severe mental health difficulties currently accessing secondary care mental health services at the point of referral (e.g. community mental health team, early intervention for psychosis service), but who have not had a routine dental appointment in the past three years.
What does the study involve?
Participants will be randomly allocated to receiving treatment as usual or treatment as usual plus the link work intervention. This will be decided by chance. The investigators will measure how often people in both groups visit the dentist. They will also assess the state of their teeth and gums. They will collect this data when people come into the study and after nine months. The authors will offer interviews to patients and staff involved in the trial to understand how they found their involvement.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The intervention aims to support people to access dental services. However, it is currently untested, which is the reason for doing the research.
When is the study starting and how long it is expected to run for?
Recruitment for the trial is starting in September 2022 and will run for seven months. The whole project is scheduled to finish in April 2024.
Who is funding the study?
The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research (HS&DR) scheme are funding the project.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Great Manchester
-
Ashton-under-Lyne, Great Manchester, United Kingdom, OL6 7SR
- Pennine Care Nhs Foundation Trust
-
Manchester, Great Manchester, United Kingdom, M25 3BL
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Greater Manchester
-
Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9PL
- University of Manchester
-
-
Lancashire
-
Lancaster, Lancashire, United Kingdom, LA1 4YW
- Lancaster University
-
Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom, PR2 8DW
- Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged >18 years
- Able to provide informed consent
- Receipt of care from a Community Mental Health Team (or equivalent service) or Early Intervention Team at the point of referral
- No routine and planned dental appointment in the past 3 years. The person should not have accessed a dental service (e.g. high street dentist, special care dentist service) for routine or planned dental care in the past 3 years. This would include any dental examination, diagnosis, advice or treatment (e.g. fillings, root canal, extractions, crowns, dentures, bridges) resulting from a routine (non-emergency) appointment at a dental service. The researchers do not consider emergency dental care (e.g. attendance at A&E, dental hospital) within this definition, although any follow-up routine and planned appointments with a dentist would exclude the person from taking part.
Exclusion criteria:
- Inpatient status on a psychiatric or secure ward. The researchers will allow participants in supported living to take part as long as they are in receipt of care from a Community Mental Health Team (or equivalent service) or Early Intervention for Psychosis Service
- Immediate risk to self or others operationalised as the presence of active intent or planning to harm oneself or others in the near future (e.g. next month). Where individuals are excluded on this basis, with the person's consent, the researcher will aim to re-contact them and the referrer in approximately 1 month's time (or a time period agreed in collaboration with the individual) to determine if the risk has subsided to a point where they are now eligible.
- Enrolled in a dental trial
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
Participants will receive treatment as usual plus a link work intervention to support access to dental services.
|
Intervention from a link worker to support participants to access dental services.
|
|
No Intervention: Treatment as usual group
Participants to receive treatment as usual and will not receive the intervention.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment rates - feasibility criteria
Time Frame: 7 months
|
Data on ability to recruit randomise 84 participants to target in a 7-month recruitment window.
Green ≥80%.
Amber 60-79%.
Red ≤59%.
|
7 months
|
|
Clinical exam - feasibility criteria
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Percentage of participants completing the dental examination.
Green ≥80%.
Amber 60-79%.
Red: ≤59%.
|
9 months
|
|
Adherence to intervention - feasibility criteria
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Percentage of participants receiving intervention ≥1 sessions during nine month window.
Green ≥80%.
Amber 60-79%.
Red ≤59%.
|
9 months
|
|
Intervention and trial protocol - feasibility criteria
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Qualitative data to understand the acceptability and feasibility of the procedures, assessments, and intervention to inform a full trial and service delivery.
This will be via qualitative interviews with service users (participants), research staff (link workers, research assistants), and key stakeholders (referrers, managers, commissioners).
Audio recordings of sessions and field notes will also be analysed.
|
9 months
|
|
Safety of intervention - feasibility criteria
Time Frame: 9 Months
|
Monitoring and review of research related serious adverse events (SAEs).
The Trial Steering Committee (TSC) will oversee SAEs across treatment arms.
The authors will discontinue the trial if the intervention or procedures elevate risk.
|
9 Months
|
|
Visiting data - feasibility criteria
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Percentage of participants with available data on dental visiting via self-report or BSA data.
Green ≥90%.
Amber 60-89%.
Red ≤59%.
|
9 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Brief Pain Inventory - short form
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
A questionnaire to assess orofacial pain.
|
Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
|
Manchester Orofacial Pain Disability Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
Pain related disability
|
Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
|
Oral Health Impact Profile
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
Oral health related quality of life
|
Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
|
Confidence around dental visiting
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
Item asking about confidence in visiting the dentist.
"How confident are you that you will be able to attend a dental appointment?"
(1, no confident; 7, very confident)
|
Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
|
Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES)
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
Assessing self-esteem
|
Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
|
Modified Dental Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
Assessing dental anxiety
|
Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
Assessing depression
|
Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
|
EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
Assessing quality of life
|
Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
|
The number of eligible participants able to access free or subsidised dental care
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
Assessing ability to successfully access free or subsidised dental care collected via the business services authority and self-report.
|
Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
|
The number of planned dental appointments attended
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
The research team will record and report the number of routine dental appointments attended, recorded by both the business services authority and self-report.
|
Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
|
Oral health self-management - tooth brushing, mouth wash, and flossing
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
'How often do you brush your teeth nowadays?' (ordinal five-point scale); 'How long do you brush your teeth for nowadays?' (ordinal five-point scale); 'How often do you clean between your teeth (inter-dental cleaning with floss, inter-dental brushes, tooth picks)?' (ordinal five-point scale); and 'Do you use a fluoride mouth-wash?' (binary)
|
Baseline and 9 month assessments
|
|
Self reported attendance at a planned dental appointment
Time Frame: 9 months
|
The research team will ask people the following 'Have you attended a dental service since the baseline assessment (nine months ago)?
This would include a routine appointment with a dentist or special care dentistry service.
It could also include a planned appointment at a dental hospital.
However, it would not include an emergency dental appointment.'.
Participants will also be asked to provide the dates and times of dental appointments.
This outcome will be coded as whether the person has or has not accessed a planned dental appointment via self-report.
|
9 months
|
|
Business services authority recorded attendance at a planned dental appointment
Time Frame: 9 months
|
NHS England collects information on visiting behaviour via the Business Services Authority.
The research team will gain participants consent to extract this data, which the researchers will then match to the participants research data.
The business services authority will be used to collect data on whether a planned care appointment has taken place.
This data will only pick up National Health Service, and not private, dental appointments.
This outcome will be coded as whether the person has or has not accessed a planned dental appointment via the business services authority data.
|
9 months
|
|
Number of decayed, missing, or filled teeth (DMFT) via dental examination
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 months
|
An examination for dental caries in permanent teeth will involve examining 32 teeth (i.e.
all permanent teeth including wisdom teeth) with a metallic periodontal probe (Community Periodontal Index (CPI) probe) and a plane mouth mirror.
|
Baseline and 9 months
|
|
Pulpal involvement, ulceration due to trauma, fistula, and abscess (PUFA) via dental examination
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 months
|
The PUFA score per person is calculated in the same cumulative way as for the DMFT and represents the number of teeth that meet the PUFA diagnostic criteria.
Thus, for an adult in our study the score can range from 0 to 32 PUFA.
|
Baseline and 9 months
|
|
Modified Plaque Score via dental examination
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 months
|
The locally derived system involves assessing six teeth representative of the entire dentition, for the worst plaque score on each tooth surface from visual examination and, where necessary, the use of a probe to detect the presence of plaque.
These six teeth are the UL4 UL1 UR6 LL6 LR1 LR4.
Each surface; Interproximal, buccal and lingual or palatal of the six teeth should be viewed in turn and the highest level of visible plaque on each surface should be scored '2'.
|
Baseline and 9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jasper Palmier-Claus, PhD, DClinPsy, Lancaster University
- Principal Investigator: Rebecca Harris, BDS, PhD, University of Liverpool
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRAS304696
- NIHR132853 (Other Grant/Funding Number: NIHR)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mental Disorders, Severe
-
Alejando Vargas RubioActive, not recruitingSevere Mental Disorder | Severe Mental IllnessSpain
-
University of KwaZuluColumbia University; Medical Research Council, South Africa; Universiteit AntwerpenRecruitingMental Disorders, SevereSouth Africa
-
University Hospital, ToursNot yet recruiting
-
Alejando Vargas RubioCompletedSevere Mental Disorder | Severe Mental IllnessSpain
-
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliRecruitingSevere Mental Disorder | Severe Mental IllnessItaly
-
University of ManchesterEuropean Research CouncilRecruitingMental Disorders, SevereUnited Kingdom
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...CompletedMental Disorders, SevereSpain
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillU.S. Department of JusticeCompletedMental Disorders, SevereUnited States
-
Liga Romana pentru Sanatate MintalaPsychiatric Hospital for Chronic Patients Siret, Suceava, RomaniaUnknown
-
Radboud University Medical CenterZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; Onze...RecruitingMental Disorders, SevereNetherlands
Clinical Trials on Link work intervention
-
Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation TrustKing's College London; University of Leeds; University of Liverpool; University... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingMental Health | Psychosis | Oral Health CareUnited Kingdom
-
Karen HeimerUniversity of Minnesota; U.S. Department of Justice; Cedar Rapids Community School...CompletedRisk Reduction BehaviorUnited States
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheim University HospitalCompletedMental Disorders | Musculoskeletal Diseases | Fatigue Syndrome, ChronicNorway
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Michael Smith FoundationUnknownPatient Safety | Resident Work HoursCanada
-
Alaine E Hernandez, PhDAmerican Music Therapy AssociationCompletedDementia | Telemedicine | Aging WellUnited States
-
Molde University CollegeNorwegian Labour and Welfare AdministrationCompletedObesity | Morbid Obesity | Work Related Illnesses | Life Style | Sick-leave
-
Rhode Island HospitalBrown UniversityCompletedOpioid-Related Disorders | Opioid Dependence | Opioid Use | Opioid AbuseUnited States
-
University of TurkuThe Hospital District of Satakunta; Finnish Work Environment FundCompletedFoot Deformities | Lower Extremity ProblemFinland
-
Sara RosenblumCompleted
-
University of Dublin, Trinity CollegeCompletedPhysical InactivityIreland