Assessment of Different Equations to Accurately Calculate LDL Cholesterol (LDL FORMULA)

October 24, 2022 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

LDL Cholesterol: Friedewald, Always the Best Option to Evaluate LDL cholesteRol Concentration in norMal and Dyslipidemic sUbjects, in Fasting and Pot-prandiaL State?

Purpose The LDL-C is a very important marker of the lipid panel which allows the introduction of a treatment and then the follow-up to prevent the cardiovascular risk. Friedewald et al have established the most widely used equation at the present time. However, it has many well-known limitations, as being false in postprandial period.

New equations have been developed recently. Our work consisted in the assessment of the accuracy of Friedewald, Sampson and Martin-Hopkins equations and evaluated the consequences in terms of misclassification. Given that European recommendations allow the realization of lipid profiles in postprandial period, we studied the accuracy of these equations in non-fasting state .

Method The LDL cholesterol concentrations will be calculated using at least three different equations (Friedewald, Sampson, Martin-Hopkins). Results will be compared between equations and between calculated and measured concentrations determined using an ultracentrifugation method. The study is conducted out according to The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and obtained the agreement of the Scientific and Ethics Committee of the Hospices Civils de Lyon (LDL EQUATION CNIL 21_488) Hypothesis

To evaluate the most accurate equation in different conditions:

  • Fasting and non-fasting state
  • In subjects with normal or dyslipidemic lipid profile To evaluate the clinical impact on risk re-classification and lipid treatment goals if LDL-c is calculated using the best equation instead of the Friedewald's.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

160000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bron, France, 69677
        • Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Multi Sites, Centre de Biologie et de Pathologie Est

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

lipid profile performed in the lab during the recruitment period

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • lipid profile performed in the location 1 during the recruitment period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Results outside the first and 99th percentile for TG parameters
  • Samples slightly opalescent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Fasting state
based on the sampling time and the serum's aspect
The serum LDL cholesterol concentrations will be calculated using at least three different equations (Friedewald, Sampson, Martin-Hopkins)
non-fasting state
based on the sampling time and the serum's aspect
The serum LDL cholesterol concentrations will be calculated using at least three different equations (Friedewald, Sampson, Martin-Hopkins)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the most accurate equation to calculate LDL cholesterol (mmo/L or g/L)
Time Frame: The outcome measure will be assessed through study completion, an average of 1 year
The outcome measure is LDL cholesterol concentration (mmol/l or g/L) determined using different equations (Friedwald, Martin Hopkins, Sampson equations, …) and measured.
The outcome measure will be assessed through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 488

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dyslipidemias

Clinical Trials on no intervention, Serum LDL cholesterol calculation

3
Subscribe