Effect of Hyaluronic Acid, With Demineralized Tooth Graft, in Socket Preservation, vs Demineralized Tooth Graft Alone.

June 3, 2025 updated by: Rahma Hesham Ahmed, Cairo University

Potential Effect Assessment of Locally Applied Hyaluronic Acid, When Mixed With Autogenous De-mineralized Tooth Graft, for Socket Preservation, in Comparison With the Application of Autogenous De-mineralized Tooth Graft Alone.

Many dentists, clinicians and researchers have conducted numerous trials, and put several materials and procedures under the test, in an attempt to preserve vertical and/or horizontal extraction sockets dimensions. The clinical consequences of post-extraction remodeling may affect the outcome of the ensuing therapies aimed at restoring the lost dentition, either by limiting the bone availability for ideal implant placement or by compromising the aesthetic result of the prosthetic restorations. In an attempt for ridge/socket preservation of a freshly extracted tooth socket/bed, this study aims to assess and compare between using autogenous tooth graft added with Hyaluronic acid, and the usage of the standardized autogenous tooth graft alone, regarding the potency, preservative feature, and quality of bone healing, density, and deposition. For a better restorative outcome using a delayed implant placement later on in the edentulous area.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The available studies provide insufficient information to assess the efficacy of the usage of ha after tooth extraction in order to induce wound healing and accelerates bone deposition and differentiation. Hence, the purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate whether there is any beneficial value of local administration of 8% ha gel formulation (gengigel ®; farmalink saglik, istanbul, turkey) on the postoperative healing phase, bone density and ridge dimensions.

In an attempt for ridge/socket preservation of a freshly extracted tooth socket/bed, this study aims to assess and compare between using autogenous tooth graft added with Hyaluronic acid, and the usage of the standardized autogenous tooth graft alone, regarding the potency, preservative feature, and quality of bone healing, density, and deposition. For a better restorative outcome using a delayed implant placement later on in the e-dentulous area.

Our null hypothesis that post-extraction ridges preserved with Hyaluronic acid mixed with autogenous tooth grafts will present no significant higher bone density at extraction site, nor better dimensional preservation of the ridge tooth/teeth socket(s), vertically and/or horizontally, than the normalized/standardized ridge preservation using autogenous tooth graft particulates alone, carried to serve delayed implants placement later on, at extraction sites.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 12611
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. 18 years old or older.
  • 2. Requiring alveolar preservation after tooth extraction prior to placement of dental implant.
  • 3. Participants that are eligible for immediate implantation, yet having factors that are hindering these patients from immediate placement of an implant at the time of extraction (ex: Financial related factors - psychological factors - time related factors).
  • 4. Motivated patients with good enough understanding of oral health measurements and importance.
  • 5. Sufficient keratinized gingiva to cover the grafted bone. 6. The presence of dentition adjacent to the bone defect.
  • 7. Patients who are healthy or have well-controlled systemic disease(s).
  • 8. Teeth extractions are to be recommended due to trauma, caries, or periodontal diseases. * 9. Single rooted teeth from both arches.
  • 10. No acute infections, pus formation, socket and bony discharges.
  • 11. Hopeless teeth, to be extracted, are bounded both mesially and distally by adjacent, teeth.
  • 12. Intact buccal bone of the teeth to be extracted.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day or an electronic cigarette dose of >6 mg/ml of nicotine).
  • 2. Presence of active infection or severe inflammation in the intervention zone.
  • 3. Relevant medical history that contraindicates implant surgery.
  • 4. Immunosuppression (eg. Hiv, solid-organ transplants). 5. Head and neck-irradiated patients in the past 5 years. 6. Regular intake of bisphosphonates, anticoagulants, or anti-inflammatories.
  • 7. Chronic drug abuse or alcoholic habits. 8. Patients with poor oral hygiene (full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score >15%) and lack of motivation.
  • 9. Uncontrolled diabetes (reported levels of glycated haemoglobin exceeding 7%).
  • 10. Uncontrolled and /or untreated periodontal disease. 11. Patients who had previously received bone graft on the site to be operated. 12. Patients with significant comorbidity such as recent heart attack or coagulation disorder.
  • 13. Pregnant subjects.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: tooth extraction and socket preservation with demineralized tooth graft
patients with immediate extraction sockets, filled and condensed with demineralized, autogenous dentinal graft particles, extracted and originated from the newly extracted tooth, then covered with biodegradable Gel foaming sponge.
tooth extraction and socket preservation with demineralized tooth graft
Experimental: tooth extraction and socket preservation with demineralized tooth graft and hyaluronic acid
patients with immediate extraction sockets, filled and condensed with demineralized, autogenous dentinal graft particles, extracted and originated from the newly extracted tooth, mixed with Hyaluronic acid, in gel form, as a carrier, then covered with biodegradable Gel foaming sponge.
tooth extraction and socket preservation with demineralized tooth graft with hyaluronic acid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
(BLRW)
Time Frame: 6 months
Bucco-lingual alveolar ridge width
6 months
(BRH)
Time Frame: 6 months
Height of Buccal ridge
6 months
(LRH).
Time Frame: 6 months
height of Lingual ridge
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
soft tissue healing
Time Frame: 2 weeks
percentage of complete post operative wound closure by soft tissues
2 weeks
residual graft
Time Frame: 6 months
percentage of residual bone graft particles
6 months
Visual analogue score (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Patient's pain and discomfort, 0-10 score, 0 represents "no pain", 10 represents "as bad as possible"
2 weeks
Percentage of newly formed bone
Time Frame: 6 months
percentage of newly formed lamellar bone bundles and/or newly formed bone trabeculae
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rahma H Mohamed Ali, Cairo university, Faculty of dentistry

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Resorption

Clinical Trials on tooth extraction and socket preservation with demineralized tooth graft

Subscribe