Prospective Data Collection to Compare RAL for Hysterectomies and Other Indications in to Conventional Laparoscopy

February 13, 2024 updated by: University Hospital Tuebingen

Prospective Data Collection to Compare Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy for Hysterectomies and Other Selected Indications in Comparison to Conventional Laparoscopy

This is a prospective, single-center, observational clinical trial at the Department of Women's Health of the University Hospital Tübingen.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, single-center, observational clinical trial at the Department of Women's Health of the University Hospital Tübingen.

100 patients affected by uterine diseases with indication for hysterectomy undergo treatment with robotically assisted laparoscopic procedures using the Senhance Surgical System (See Synopsis - Indication A) and are compared to a cohort of 200 patients treated with conventional laparoscopic surgery from a similar ongoing study (Ethics vote: 621 /2018BO1).

100 patients affected by other uterine conditions / adnexal conditions that require uterine/adnexal/tubal surgery (see Synopsis - Indication B) undergo treatment with robotically assisted laparoscopic procedures using the Senhance Surgical System and are compared to a cohort of 200 patients with indication for other uterine conditions / adnexal conditions that require uterine/adnexal/tubal surgery (see Synopsis - Indication B) who underwent conventional laparoscopic surgery at the Department of Women's Health in the past.

At the end of patient recruitment, surgical procedure times, estimated blood loss, intra- and post-operative complications and the percentage of conversions from the robotic assisted treatment/conventional laparoscopic surgery to multiple access and/or to a laparotomic (open) approach will be documented.

Patients will answer questionnaires (German version of the Short Form-36health survey questionnaire (Medical Outcomes Trust), German version of the female sexual function index (FSFI)) at baseline and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. A questionnaire for patient satisfaction will be answered one day post procedural, at discharge and at 3 and 6 months follow-up.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Bernhard Krämer, Prof. Dr.
  • Phone Number: 07071 29-82211

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

primary care clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥18 years
  • BMI ≤40 kg/m2
  • indication for hysterectomy for benign disease or prophylactic surgery due to hereditary cancer
  • indication for radical hysterectomy and/or pelvic-/para-aortic (sentinel-node) lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer
  • indication for modified radical hysterectomy and/or pelvic-/para-aortic (sentinel-node) lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer
  • indication for other uterine conditions / adnexal conditions that require uterine/adnexal/tubal surgery: Fibroids, Endometriomas, Cystic masses, Ectopic pregnancies, Sactosalpinx, Inflammatory adnexal disease, Opportunistic salpingectomy as part of hysterectomy or exclusively, Cervico-/Sacrokolpopexy
  • size of uterus and vagina allows for retrieval by the vaginal route in cancer patients
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known extensive intra-abdominal adhesions
  • anaesthesiological contraindications to laparoscopy
  • women with pacemaker or other implants where electrosurgery is to be avoided
  • women with known defects of the hemostasis
  • pregnancy
  • other internal or anatomical criteria that preclude a minimal invasive approach
  • inability to understand patient information

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Senhance Surgical System
100 patients affected by uterine diseases with indication for hysterectomy undergo treatment with robotically assisted laparoscopic procedures using the Senhance Surgical System
100 patients affected by uterine diseases with indication for hysterectomy undergo treatment with robotically assisted laparoscopic procedures using the Senhance Surgical System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
operating time
Time Frame: 60 minutes
time from first incision to skin closure
60 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
estimated blood loss (milliliters)
Time Frame: 60 minutes
using the following formula: ((Hemoglobin concentration preoperative (g/l)) - (Hemoglobin 1st day postoperative (g/l)))/((Hemoglobin preoperative (g/l)) - (Hemoglobin 1st day postoperative (g/l)))/2) × 1000
60 minutes
intraoperative complications
Time Frame: 60 minutes
(occurring during the surgical procedure)
60 minutes
perioperative complications
Time Frame: 24 hours
(occurring less than 24h after the surgical procedure)
24 hours
postoperative complications
Time Frame: 6 months
(occurring more than 24h after the surgical procedure up to 6 months after surgical procedure)
6 months
time under narcosis
Time Frame: 60 minutes
duration of time in which the study participant is under the influence of a narcotic substance
60 minutes
console time
Time Frame: 60 minutes
duration of time during which a surgeon is controlling the surgical robot from a console
60 minutes
conversion to other surgical procedures (e. g. open)
Time Frame: 60 minutes
if the original surgical plan during surgery is altered and switched to a different type of surgery to address unforeseen complications or difficulties that arise during the operation
60 minutes
time to discharge
Time Frame: 60 minutes
length of time that a patient spends in the hospital before they are well enough to be released and sent home
60 minutes
German version of the Short Form-36health survey questionnaire (Medical Outcomes Trust)
Time Frame: at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up
The SF-36 questionnaire (Short Form 36 Health Survey) is a widely used measure of health status and quality of life. The questionnaire consists of 36 items that measure eight health domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The scores range from 0 to 100 for each domain, with higher scores indicating better health status. Therefore, higher scores on the SF-36 indicate a better outcome.
at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up
German version of the female sexual function index (FSFI) questionnaire
Time Frame: at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up
female sexual function index: a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function; The total composite sexual function score is a sum of domain scores and ranges from 2.0 (not sexually active and no desire) to 36.0. Higher scores on the FSFI indicate better sexual function.
at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up
Questionnaire for patient satisfaction
Time Frame: at one day post procedural, at discharge and at 3 and 6 months follow-up
Including A Pain Score ( No Pain 0 - Worst Possible Pain 10) and B Satisfaction with: the severity of the pain; the quality of recovery; the scars; the surgery overall (Scale satisfaction: Extremely dissatisfied -- Dissatisfied -- Somewhat dissatisfied -- Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied -- Somewhat satisfied -- Satisfied -- Extremely satisfied)
at one day post procedural, at discharge and at 3 and 6 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jürgen Andress, Dr, Department für Frauengesundheit am Universitätsklinikum Tübingen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 22, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uterine Diseases

Clinical Trials on Senhance Surgical System

3
Subscribe