Zambia Stroke Unit Study (ZASUS)

September 2, 2025 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Evaluation of a Locally Adapted Stroke Unit to Improve Outcomes in Lusaka, Zambia

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of a locally adapted stroke unit on outcomes of adults with stroke in Zambia. The main question[s] to answer are: • Does provision of evidence-based stroke care improve after implementation of a stroke unit at the University Teaching Hospital in Zambia? • Do patients cared for in a locally adapted stroke unit at the University Teaching Hospital in Zambia have better in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes that similar patients who were not cared for in the stroke unit? The investigators will collect data on the types of care participants receive during hospitalization and vital status (alive/dead) at the time of hospital discharge and at 90-days post-discharge. Researchers will compare patients enrolled in this study to a historical group of adults with stroke cared for at the same hospital prior to implementation of the stroke unit.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The overarching goal of this project is to evaluate the uptake and impact of locally relevant, feasible, and generalizable stroke systems of care developed for the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) in Lusaka, Zambia using the Adopt-Contextualize-Adapt framework in order to improve stroke-related outcomes. Zambia is a country of ~20 million people in southern Africa where stroke is the eighth leading cause of death. However, stroke is not a problem unique to Zambia. Stroke is the second leading cause of adult disability and mortality worldwide. More than 75% of stroke-related morbidity and mortality occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and stroke prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is among the highest in the world. Yet, most stroke literature to date has been developed in high-income settings and its results applied to LMICs without adequate consideration of biological, ethnic, cultural and contextual differences. Diverse populations and settings in LMICs, including Zambia, necessitate evaluating unique risk factors, treatment strategies and systems of care in order to develop locally relevant interventions to improve stroke-related outcomes.

While acute stroke interventions (e.g., tissue plasminogen activator, endovascular therapies) have improved outcomes, indirect advances in stroke care have had a broader impact. Implementation of standardized systems of stroke care - i.e. stroke units - has led to secondary gains in stroke-related outcomes regardless of whether patients receive acute interventions. Compared to alternative care models, inpatient stroke unit care is associated with substantial reductions in death, dependency, and institutionalized care. In LMICs with limited access to specialists, neuroimaging, and acute stroke interventions, standardized systems of stroke care have not been instituted, including across Zambia and much of SSA. Absence of standardized systems of care likely accounts for higher rates of poor functional outcomes and mortality compared to higher-income settings.

Developing systems of stroke care in Zambia may improve stroke outcomes even in the absence of acute stroke interventions. Yet, simply instituting stroke clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) developed in high-income settings is unlikely to be successful without attention to differences in resource availability, health systems, and local contextual factors. Differences in biology (e.g. younger age, higher rates of HIV and rheumatic heart disease, differing risk factors) may also necessitate changes to stroke care delivery. As such, development of systems of stroke care in Zambia offers the promise of substantially improving stroke outcomes but must be done in a way in which stroke biology as well as cultural, patient, provider, and health systems factors are carefully considered during the design and implementation process.

Prior research characterized stroke care practices and stroke-related outcomes at the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) in Zambia. More recently, contextualized, locally relevant stroke CPGs were developed for UTH using the systematic guideline adaptation process of the Adopt-Contextualize-Adapt framework. These have recently been implemented as part of Zambia's first stroke unit. This project will assess the impact of local stroke CPGs on CPG adherence, stroke quality measures (QMs) and mortality through a post-intervention cohort of 300 adults with stroke. In this cohort, CPG uptake and in-hospital and post-discharge mortality will be measured and compared to a historical pre-intervention cohort of adults with stroke admitted to UTH before stroke unit implementation. If effective, results could potentially be applied across SSA thereby improving outcomes for millions of people with stroke.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lusaka, Zambia, 00000
        • University Teaching Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically suspected diagnosis of stroke by treating neurologist or imaging-confirmed diagnosis of stroke
  • Symptom onset (last known normal) within 7 days of presentation to the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia
  • Inpatient admission to the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stroke Unit Arm
All participants in this study will be adults with stroke cared for in the recently implemented stroke unit at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia. Of note, all adults with stroke admitted to the University Teaching Hospital during the study period will be cared for in the stroke unit regardless of participation participation in this study. However, only those who consent to study participation will have data collected.
The stroke unit at the University Teaching Hospital is a 12-bed unit on the general medical wards staffed by neurologists and nurses specifically trained in stroke care. This intervention includes new protocols and clinical practice guidelines that were developed by multiple stakeholders in Zambia to standardize stroke care, with a focus on early and consistent mobilization of patients with stroke, minimizing use of urinary catheters, provision of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, formal assessment of swallowing and assignment of modified diets as needed, and appropriate initiation of secondary prevention medications for stroke. Nurses and doctors working in this unit were trained on the new stroke unit protocols and are asked to follow these protocols in caring for patients with stroke admitted to the Stroke Unit.
No Intervention: Pre-Stroke Unit Arm
This arm will consist of a historical cohort of adults with stroke admitted to the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia for the implementation of a stroke unit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of clinical practice guidelines followed during inpatient admission
Time Frame: <=10 days of inpatient hospitalization for acute stroke (patients will be followed for the first 10 days of hospital admission or until hospital discharge, whichever is first)
Whether or not each individual clinical practice guideline is followed will be tracked each day of the participant's inpatient admission for stroke. The total proportion of clinical practice guidelines followed will then be calculated.
<=10 days of inpatient hospitalization for acute stroke (patients will be followed for the first 10 days of hospital admission or until hospital discharge, whichever is first)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: Duration of inpatient hospitalization ( likely to average <7 days after enrollment ) up to 7 days
Proportion of patients who die during the inpatient hospitalization for acute stroke
Duration of inpatient hospitalization ( likely to average <7 days after enrollment ) up to 7 days
90-day post-discharge mortality
Time Frame: Duration of inpatient hospitalization + 90 days (likely to average < 100 days after enrollment)
Proportion of patients who survive the inpatient hospitalization but die within 90 days of discharge as assessed by telephone call
Duration of inpatient hospitalization + 90 days (likely to average < 100 days after enrollment)
Functional status at 90-days post-discharge
Time Frame: Duration of inpatient hospitalization + 90 days (likely to average <100 days after enrollment)
Proportion of patients with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) <2 vs mRS >=2 at 90-days post-discharge. mRS will be measured using the telephone version of the modified Rankin Scale and the study team will include all patients (not just those who survived the initial hospitalization) in this outcome.Score range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Duration of inpatient hospitalization + 90 days (likely to average <100 days after enrollment)
Rate of aspiration pneumonia
Time Frame: <=10 days of inpatient hospitalization for acute stroke (patients will be followed for the first 10 days of hospital admission or until hospital discharge, whichever is first)
Aspiration pneumonia will be defined as >=4 of the following criteria: fever (temperature >38°C), tachypnea (respiratory rate >20), hypoxemia (oxygen saturation <92%), cough, rhonchi, witnessed aspiration event, initiation of antibiotics for clinically suspected aspiration pneumonia, leukocytosis (WBC >10,000) on complete blood count (CBC) or opacity on chest X-ray. These criteria will be assessed daily for the first 10 days of admission or until discharge, whichever comes first.
<=10 days of inpatient hospitalization for acute stroke (patients will be followed for the first 10 days of hospital admission or until hospital discharge, whichever is first)
Rate of decubitus ulcers
Time Frame: <=10 days of inpatient hospitalization for acute stroke (patients will be followed for the first 10 days of hospital admission or until hospital discharge, whichever is first)
Presence or absence of decubitus ulcers will be assessed daily with a skin exam for the first ten days of inpatient hospitalization or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.
<=10 days of inpatient hospitalization for acute stroke (patients will be followed for the first 10 days of hospital admission or until hospital discharge, whichever is first)
Rate of deep vein thrombosis
Time Frame: <=10 days of inpatient hospitalization for acute stroke (patients will be followed for the first 10 days of hospital admission or until hospital discharge, whichever is first)
Proportion of patients diagnosed with a deep vein thrombosis confirmed on ultrasound during the first 10 days of hospitalization or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first.
<=10 days of inpatient hospitalization for acute stroke (patients will be followed for the first 10 days of hospital admission or until hospital discharge, whichever is first)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deanna Saylor, MD, MHS, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 8, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 17, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study protocols and study materials as described below as well as a de-identified dataset will be shared if sharing criteria (described below) are met.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available one year after study completion for a period of three years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All requests for study data will need to be approved by the study team and by both a Zambian IRB (University of Zambia Biomedical Ethics Regulatory Committee or Excellence Research Ethics & Science (ERES) Converge IRB) and the Zambia National Health Research Authority prior to data sharing.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Stroke Unit

Subscribe