Early Intestinal Ultrasound in Predicting Treatment Response to Filgotinib in Ulcerative Colitis (STEER)

December 8, 2022 updated by: Krisztina Gecse, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Intestinal Ultrasonography in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Treated With Filgotinib

Objective disease assessment in inflammatory bowel diseases at the time of treatment initiation and during follow-up has become gold standard. However, biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin, fail to provide information on disease extent, location or complications. Repeated endoscopic assessments are performed to evaluate mucosal response to treatment, though associated costs, availability, invasiveness and patient preference are considerable limitations. Recently, intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has gained significant momentum as a non-invasive, easily accessible and low-cost alternative for objective assessment. Accordingly, the ECCO-ESGAR guideline recognizes IUS as a potential tool for the diagnosis and for the monitoring of IBD.

Our study aim is to evaluate the change in intestinal ultrasound parameters (as measured by B-mode and SWE at baseline and week 4) to predict endoscopic response and remission as defined by the follow-up endoscopy and measured by the Mayo endoscopic subscore and the UCEIS during treatment with filgotinib

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Noord-holland
      • Amsterdam-Zuidoost, Noord-holland, Netherlands, 1105AZ
        • Amsterdam UMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with moderate to severe UC starting on filgotonib treatment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years of age
  • Endoscopic and/or histological confirmed diagnosis of UC
  • UC disease extent proximal to the rectum (ie, left-sided colitis or pancolitis)
  • Moderately to severely active UC, defined by an endoscopic Mayo score of ≥ 2
  • Indication for receiving filgotinib treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Proctitis only
  • Ongoing gastroenteritis
  • (Sub)total colectomy
  • Obesity (BMI >35 kg/m²)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Filgotinib treated patients
Ulcerative colitis patients treated with filgotinib will undergo intestinal transabdominal ultrasound at baseline, week 4 and at the time of the follow-up endoscopy (week 10-16)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluate the change in intestinal ultrasound parameters to predict endoscopic response as defined by the follow-up endoscopy measured by the Mayo endoscopic subscore during treatment with filgotinib
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks
Evaluate the change in intestinal ultrasound parameters to predict endoscopic response as defined by the follow-up endoscopy and measured by the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) during treatment with filgotinib
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks
Evaluate the change in intestinal ultrasound parameters to predict endoscopic remission as defined by the follow-up endoscopy and measured by the Mayo endoscopic subscore during treatment with filgotinib
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks
Evaluate the change in intestinal ultrasound parameters to predict endoscopic remission as defined by the follow-up endoscopy and measured by the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) during treatment with filgotinib
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
evaluate the change in IUS parameters (B-mode and shear-wave elastography (SWE; in kPa) at baseline and week 4) to predict clinical response during follow-up endoscopy
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
B-mode: bowel wall thickness (BWT), colour doppler signal (CDS), loss of stratification, loss of haustration and presence of lymph nodes
10-16 weeks
evaluate the change in IUS parameters (B-mode and SWE; measured in kPa) at baseline and week 4) to predict clinical remission during follow-up endoscopy
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks
• to evaluate the change in IUS parameters (as measured by B-mode and SWE at baseline and week 4) to predict biochemical response and remission at the time of the follow-up endoscopy.
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks
• to evaluate the change in IUS parameters (as measured by B-mode and SWE at baseline and week 4) to predict histological remission at the time of the follow-up endoscopy
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks
• to evaluate IUS parameters (as measured in B-mode) in predicting biochemical remission at 1 year (as defined by fecal calprotectin< 150 ug/g)
Time Frame: 52 weeks / 1 year
52 weeks / 1 year
• to evaluate IUS parameters (as measured in B-mode) in predicting cortico-steroid-free remission at 1 year
Time Frame: 52 weeks / 1 year
52 weeks / 1 year
• to evaluate IUS parameters (as measured in B-mode) in predicting clinical remission at 1 year (as defined by the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) ≤ 2)
Time Frame: 52 weeks / 1 year
52 weeks / 1 year
• to evaluate if addition of calprotectin to early IUS (at week 4) could better predict endoscopic response as defined by the follow-up endscopy than IUS or calprotectin alone.
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4 weeks
• to evaluate if addition of calprotectin to early IUS (at week 4) could better predict endoscopic remission as defined by the follow-up endscopy than IUS or calprotectin alone.
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4 weeks
• to evaluate individual wall layer thickness, with special regard to the submucosa, in relation to response to treatment
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks
• to describe SWE (measured in kPa) in patients with moderate to severe UC
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks
• correlate SWE (measured in kPa) with endoscopic findings of disease severity (measured by the Mayo endoscopic subscore)
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks
• correlate SWE (measured in kPa) with endoscopic findings of disease severity (measured by the UCEIS subscore)
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks
• to evaluate correlation between SWE findings and characteristics of the submucosa, including wall layer thickness and hyperechogenicity
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks
• to evaluate the correlation between segmental healing upon endoscopy and IUS
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
10-16 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
• Can early (baseline to week 4) changes in IUS parameters (B-mode and SWE) predict long-term clinical (defined by a decrease of ≥ 3 in SCCAI) response at 1 year
Time Frame: between baseline and 52 weeks / 1 year
between baseline and 52 weeks / 1 year
• Can early (baseline to week 4) changes in IUS parameters (B-mode and SWE) predict long-term clinical (defined by SCCAI ≤ 2) remission at 1 year
Time Frame: between baseline and 52 weeks / 1 year
between baseline and 52 weeks / 1 year
• Can early (baseline to week 4) changes in IUS parameters predict long-term biochemical response at 1 year (measured by fecal calprotectin <250 µg/g )
Time Frame: between baseline and 52 weeks / 1 year
between baseline and 52 weeks / 1 year
• to explore whether early (baseline to week 4) changes in IUS parameters can predict long-term biochemical remission at 1 year (measured by fecal calprotectin <150 µg/g )
Time Frame: between baseline and 52 weeks / 1 year
between baseline and 52 weeks / 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ulcerative Colitis

Clinical Trials on Intestinal ultrasound

Subscribe