Speed-based and Mechanical Work Considered HIIT for Football Referees

January 10, 2023 updated by: Lingling ZHANG, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Effects of Speed-based and Mechanical Work Considered HIIT on Physical and Physiological Performance of Chinese Elite Female Referees in Fitness Tests

Majority of the existing studies on the high intensity training of referees are heart rate-based prescription. It is probably the most commonly measured physiological marker used to control or measure exercise intensity in the field.Indeed, speed-based intensity training is more acute than heart rate-based training on the intensity of physical work performed above v/pVO2max. This study the setting of exercise intensity reference the ending velocity of the 30-15 intermittent fitness test.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was carried out during the 10 weeks of before the seminar which conducted before the season. The assessments were carried out pre and post training intervention in the before and after week of the intervention, it includes 30-15 intermittent fitness test(VIFT),dynamic Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test, 40m repeat speed ability test, change direction test and cooper test.The experimental group(EG) take 10 weeks Speed-based (VIFT) HIIT protocol performed on each Wednesday and Saturday, 60 min for each session. One EG with mechanical work combined in the HIIT exercises, and another EG is not. The control group during the study performed on the same occasion heart rate-based HIIT.

The TL was assessed using the 0-10-point rating perceived exertion (RPE) scale according to the procedures. With the aim to obtain more detailed information especially the muscle strain, during each occasion (i.e., training session or match) the referees should provide differentiated RPE (dRPE) for respiratory (RPEres) and leg muscle (RPEmus) exertion perception.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: KIM Geok Soh, Professor
  • Phone Number: 0397698153
  • Email: kims@upm.edu.my

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Qingdao, Shandong, China, 266000
        • Recruiting
        • Lingling ZHANG
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

23 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • the female referees who register as reserve national degree and above for 2022 and 2023.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Injured
  • Any reason can not complete all the required training sessions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Heart rate-based HIIT
12 weeks heart-rate based HIIT intervention.
Week1,90% HRmax long duration HIIT + 90% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week2,90% HRmax long duration HIIT + 90% long duration HRmax HIIT. Week3,90% HRmax long duration HIIT + 90% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week4,90% HRmax long duration HIIT + 90% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week5,90% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week6,90% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week7,90% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week8,90% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week9,90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT. Week10,90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT. Week11,90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT. Week12,90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT.
Experimental: VIFT speed-based HIIT with mechanical work
12 weeks VIFT speed-based HIIT with mechanical work.
Week1,Wednesday 65% VIFT HIIT, saturday 65% VIFT HIIT. Week2,Wednesday 65% VIFT HIIT, saturday 65% VIFT HIIT. Week3,Wednesday 67.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 67.5% VIFT HIIT. Week4,Wednesday 67.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 67.5% VIFT HIIT. Week5,Wednesday 70% VIFT HIIT, saturday 90% VIFT HIIT. Week6,Wednesday 70% VIFT HIIT, saturday 90% VIFT HIIT. Week7,Wednesday 72.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 92.5% VIFT HIIT. Week8,Wednesday 72.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 92.5% VIFT HIIT. Week9,Wednesday 92.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 100% VIFT HIIT. Week10,Wednesday 92.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 100% VIFT HIIT. Week11,Wednesday 95% VIFT HIIT, saturday 105% VIFT HIIT. Week12,Wednesday 95% VIFT HIIT, saturday 105% VIFT HIIT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical performance in fitness tests
Time Frame: 3 days before the intervention
Distance covered during dynamic yo-yo test
3 days before the intervention
Physical performance in fitness tests
Time Frame: 3 days before the intervention, just 7min before the dynamic yo-yo test
The timing consume during the 40m repeat speed ability test
3 days before the intervention, just 7min before the dynamic yo-yo test
Physical performance in fitness tests
Time Frame: 3 days before the intervention, just 5min before the 40m repeat speed test
The timing consume during the change of direction test
3 days before the intervention, just 5min before the 40m repeat speed test
Physiological performance in the fitness tests
Time Frame: 3days before the intervention
The HRmax and HRmean and lactic acid concentration during dynamic yo-yo test
3days before the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical performance in fitness tests
Time Frame: 3 days after the 12 weeks intervention
Distance covered during dynamic yo-yo test, evaluate the participants' ability to repeatedly perform intense exercise.
3 days after the 12 weeks intervention
Physical performance in fitness tests
Time Frame: 3 days after the 12 weeks intervention, 7min before the dynamic yo-yo test
The timing consume during the 40m repeat speed ability test, evaluate the participants' repeat speed ability.
3 days after the 12 weeks intervention, 7min before the dynamic yo-yo test
Physical performance in fitness tests
Time Frame: 3 days after the 12 weeks intervention, 5min before the 40m repeat speed test
The timing consume during the change of direction test, evaluate the participants' change of direction ability.
3 days after the 12 weeks intervention, 5min before the 40m repeat speed test
Physiological performance in the fitness tests
Time Frame: 3 days after the 12 weeks intervention
The HRmax and HRmean and lactic acid concentration in dynamic yo-yo test
3 days after the 12 weeks intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Training load
Time Frame: 12 weeks,during each high intensity training
RPEcr10,RPEmuscle,RPErespiratory
12 weeks,during each high intensity training
Physical performance in fitness tests
Time Frame: Saturday of the fourth week
Distance covered during dynamic yo-yo test;The timing consume during the 40m repeat speed ability test;The timing consume during the change of direction test;
Saturday of the fourth week
Physiological performance in fitness tests
Time Frame: Saturday of the fourth week
The HRmax and HRmean and lactic acid concentration during dynamic yo-yo test
Saturday of the fourth week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lingling ZHANG, University Principal Investigator

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 22, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ZHANG Lingling

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Since this is my doctoral thesis experiment,I won't share it until I graduate.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Fitness

Clinical Trials on Heart rate based HIIT

3
Subscribe