Heart Rate Assessment at Birth Comparing Stethoscope Versus Tap-based Application

September 3, 2021 updated by: University of Alberta

Standard 6-sec Method Versus Tap-based Application Method to Assess Heart Rate at Birth - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Some newborn babies have difficulty breathing at birth and need help. When babies need help with breathing the clinical team, the team measures heart rate using a stethoscope to check its heart rate and figure out what kind of help they will need. If the heart rate is too low, the clinical team will begin to inflate the baby's lung. Knowing the baby's heart rate quickly is important but the stethoscope is inaccurate, and might delay start of resuscitation. Using a smartphone app that uses screen tapping with a stethoscope could allow heart rate to be measured much faster compared to the stethoscope and allow the clinical team to support the baby's needs better immediately after birth.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose

Nearly 10% of all infants born worldwide require respiratory support at birth and birth asphyxia remains one of the leading causes of infant morbidity and mortality. Neonatal resuscitation is the most effective strategy to deal with this condition. Moreover, an infant's heart rate (HR) is the most significant clinical parameter used to assess the need for and response to neonatal resuscitation. Currently, a newborn's HR is determined by auscultating or palpating of the umbilical cord. Although auscultation is more precise compared to palpation, both methods are inaccurate and tend to underestimate HR. The current resuscitation guidelines also recommend using electrocardiogram (ECG) and pulse oximetry, which allow for continuous monitoring, however are slow to apply and detect HR compared to stethoscopes. During neonatal resuscitation, an infant's HR is necessary to initiate resuscitation and to monitor the effectiveness of each intervention and therefore it becomes essential to accurately and quickly assess an infant's HR during this process. If HR is detected slowly or inaccurately, there is an increased risk that necessary interventions are not started or that certain interventions are prolonged, which could lead to increased morbidity and mortality of the infants. The recent advances in technology, namely the development of a smartphone tap application for HR assessment is promising as a novel tool for quick and accurate HR detection during neonatal resuscitation.

Hypothesis

The use of a tap-based smartphone application will be faster and more accurate when compared to standard auscultation with the 6-sec method to assess HR.

Justification

Simulation studies have shown that it is feasible to measure HR using a tap-based application. Moreover, the investigator's group has recently shown its reliability in an animal model of asphyxia-induced neonatal swine. The investigator showed its accuracy compared to the experimental gold standard carotid blood flow-derived HR assessments and report a median time of 3 sec for assessment, which is less than the current recommended time for auscultation. However, no study has been performed in the delivery room in newborn babies at birth. Therefore, the investigator aim to compare the tap-based application to the current 6-sec standard approach to assess HR during neonatal resuscitation in the delivery room. Ehe investigator anticipate this study will allow us to determine the most reliable approach for initial assessment to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality outcomes.

Objectives

To examine (i) accuracy and (ii) speed to assess HR using auscultation with a tap-based application during neonatal resuscitation.

Research Method/Procedures

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial comparing two different approaches to accurately assess HR. The investigator will compare the routinely used Neonatal Resuscitation Program 6-sec method with a stethoscope using two different methods of auscultation [6-sec method and tap-based method (NeoTapLS, Tap4Life, Stockholm, Sweden)] to accurately assess HR immediately after birth. The investigator aim to collect the data over a period of 12 months.

Two investigators in addition to the clinical team will attend the delivery of newborn infants. Immediately after birth the infant will be placed on a resuscitation trolley where a pulse oximeter will be attached to the right hand. At the same time three ECG leads will be placed on the infant's chest. Simultaneously the stethoscope will be placed by one of the investigators on the infants' chest to obtain the HR . In the alternative setup, stethoscope will be used in combination with the tap-based application.

In both setups, the time needed to display a HR will be recorded for all devices. All infants will have routine HR measured using ECG, which will be used as comparison for accuracy

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5H 3V9
        • Royal Alexandra Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 5 minutes (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All newborn infants delivered in the Royal Alexandra Hospital (RAH) 22+0-41+6 weeks gestation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants will be excluded if parents refused to consent to the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control group
Heart rate assessment using the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 6-sec assessment method At birth, the clinical team will place the stethoscope on the infant chest and calculate heart rate by listening to the heart beat for 6-sec and then compute the heart rate of the newborn infant.
Heart rate assessment using the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 6-sec assessment method At birth, the clinical team will place the stethoscope on the infant chest and calculate heart rate by listening to the heart beat for 6-sec and then compute the heart rate of the newborn infant.
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention group
Heart rate assessment using Tap-based smartphone application At birth, the clinical team will place the stethoscope on the infant chest and calculate heart rate using a Tap-based smartphone application by tapping the screen for 3 beats at that time a heart rate will be displayed.
At birth, the clinical team will place the stethoscope on the infant chest and calculate heart rate using a Tap-based smartphone application by tapping the screen for 3 beats at that time a heart rate will be displayed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to obtain Heart rate
Time Frame: within the first 60 seconds form birth
Time to obtain Heart rate form birth
within the first 60 seconds form birth

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of heart rate assessment using either technique
Time Frame: within the first 60 seconds form birth
Accuracy of heart rate assessment using tap-based application or 6-sec method
within the first 60 seconds form birth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 16, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 30, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

requests can be made to the PI

IPD Sharing Time Frame

once study is completed and published

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

email requests to the PI

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asphyxia Neonatorum

Clinical Trials on Heart rate assessment using the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 6-sec assessment method

3
Subscribe