Exactech Proximal Humerus Fracture Plate System Post Market Clinical Follow-up

September 20, 2023 updated by: Exactech

An Open Label, Multi-Center, Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation of Equinoxe Proximal Humerus Fracture Plates Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

The objective of this study is to collect and evaluate long-term clinical outcomes data in order to better understand the safety and performance of the Equinoxe Proximal Humerus Fracture Plates over time. This study will follow subjects for a period of up to 10 years post-surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

151

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Recruiting
        • NYU Grossman School of Medicine
        • Contact:
          • Phone Number: 718-206-6923

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing ORIF surgery who meet eligibility criteria - Patients who consent to participate to return for follow-up visits out to 10 years or longer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is indicated to receive Equinoxe Proximal Humerus Fracture Plate or has previously underwent primary surgery with Equioxe Proximal Humerus Fracture Plate
  • Patient is willing to participate by complying with pre- and postoperative visit requirements
  • Patient is willing to agree to be followed for up to 10 years following their index surgery
  • Patient is willing and able to review and sign a study informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Osteomyelitis of the proximal humerus or scapula
  • Inadequate or malformed bone that precludes adequate support or fixation of the prosthesis
  • Patient's age, weight, or activity level would cause the surgeon to expect early failure of the system
  • The patient is unwilling or unable to comply with the post-operative care instructions
  • Alcohol, drug, or other subtance abuse
  • Any disease state that could adversaly affect the function or longevity of the implant
  • Patient is pregnant
  • Patient is a prisoner
  • Patient has a physical or mental condition that would invalidate the results

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Other

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ASES
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) - 100 points scale about shoulder pain and performance evaluation in activities of daily living where 100 indicates the best shoulder condition
Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
Smart Score
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart (SAS) score - 6 questions based on 3 objective active range of motion and 3 subjective measures of pain and function. Score range of 0 to 100 where 100 indicates the best score
Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
Sane Score
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) - Patient shoulder self-evaluation as a percentage of normal, 100% corresponds being normal
Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
Quick DASH
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
Shorten version of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) - 11 items to measure ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity where 0 corresponds to no difficulty and 100 corresponds to unable
Through study completion, an average of 1 per year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abhishek Ganta, MD, NYU Grossman School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 19, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2033

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fracture Dislocation

3
Subscribe