Novel Local Infiltration Anesthesia for Radial Artery Cannulation.

February 16, 2023 updated by: Yi Zhang, First People's Hospital of Chenzhou

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Conventional, Bar-shaped, and V-shaped Local Infiltration Anesthesia on Pain Relief and Cannulation Success Rate in Patients Requiring Radial Artery Cannulation.

This clinical trial aims to compare the pain scores and cannulation success rates of conventional, bar-shaped, and V-shaped local infiltration anesthesia in participants' radial artery cannulation.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Are bar-shaped and V-shaped more successful than the conventional block in radial artery cannulation?
  • Are bar-shaped and V-shaped less painful than the conventional block in radial artery cannulation? Participants will describe their pain score during their radial artery cannulation.

Researchers will compare the pain scores and cannulation success rates in bar-shaped, V-shaped, and conventional line blocking to see if bar-shaped and V-shaped blocking is better choices than conventional line blocking.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study, as well as the necessity, benefits, and risks of arterial cannulation, and the purpose of the study, were explained in detail to all participants screened by inclusion and exclusion criteria, and signed informed consent was obtained on the day before the operation.

Upon entering the operating room, participants will be connected to a pulse oximeter, noninvasive blood pressure monitor, and electrocardiograph and will record baseline heart rate, blood pressure, depth of the radial artery at the first wrist stripe before local anesthesia, and PVDF capacitance difference.

The arterial pressure transducer and tubing will be flushed with 25 U/mL of heparin saline and kept in a ready state.

Anesthesiologists not participating in the study will then be asked to open an opaque sealed envelope to determine the type of local anesthesia to be used during intubation. The conventional approach is to complete a 2 cm subcutaneous injection with 2% lidocaine directly above the artery in the direction of the palpable beat; the bar-blocking is to complete a 2 cm subcutaneous injection perpendicular to the arterial beat line 2 cm from the proximal segment of the puncture site, and the V-blocking is to complete a subcutaneous injection at a 90-degree angle with a 2-cm margin toward the distal end at 2 cm proximal to the puncture site. Heart rate, blood pressure, depth of the radial artery at the first wrist stripe, and PVDF capacitance difference were recorded at the end of local anesthesia.

The radial artery cannula will be placed with a 20 gauge radial artery catheter by palpation under the supervision of an anesthesia consultant in the operating room by another anesthesiology resident not involved in the study.

The participator's arm will be slightly abducted (less than 90 degrees) and placed on the arm board, placing the wrist in the extended position by placing a padded towel under the wrist. The wrist will then be secured to the arm board with tape. To maintain sterility, the wrist will be pretreated with 10% povidone-iodine, and surgical gloves and a sterile cloth will be used. The timer will start counting when the operator starts palpating the radial artery pulse. Immediately after successful cannulation, the assistant will connect a pressure monitoring tube. The timer will stop as soon as the arterial waveform appears on the monitor. The number of cannulations is also recorded, with one cannulation recorded for each skin puncture or each change of the puncture needle direction. If cannulation fails three times or if the radial artery is not cannulated after 360 seconds, the procedure will be aborted and recorded as "failed cannulation". A senior anesthesiologist will then complete the arterial cannulation using whatever method he/she decides. The time taken for cannulation is recorded, as well as the application of ultrasonography to measure the depth of the puncture site at the first wrist stripe after local anesthesia and the difference in PVDF membrane capacitance.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rates were collected at the start and end of cannulation in the other arm, the time to successful placement of the radial artery cannula (in seconds), and the times of cannulation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hunan
      • Chenzhou, Hunan, China, 423400
        • Chenzhou First People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The participant is scheduled for elective surgery.
  • The participant's elective surgery required radial artery cannulation.
  • Participants should be at least 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The Allen test of the participant is negative.
  • The participant has a history of peripheral vascular disease.
  • The participant has a cannula site infection or lesion.
  • The participant is on vasoactive medication.
  • A history of artery cannulation at the planned cannulation site within the past month.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Line arm
Conventional line blocking is used in radial artery cannulation for local infiltration.
Participants will receive a 2 cm subcutaneous 1% lidocaine local infiltration injection parallel to the arm at the puncture site.
Other Names:
  • lidocaine infiltration at the point
Experimental: Bar arm
Bar-blocking is used in radial artery cannulation for local infiltration.
Participants will receive a bar-shaped subcutaneous 1% lidocaine local infiltration injection in the vertical arm, 2 cm away from the puncture site.
Other Names:
  • lidocaine infiltration with a cross bar
Experimental: V arm
V-blocking is used in radial artery cannulation for local infiltration.
Participants will receive a V-shaped subcutaneous 1% lidocaine local infiltration injection at a 90-degree angle 2 cm away from the puncture site.
Other Names:
  • lidocaine infiltration with v shape

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS score
Time Frame: upto 10 minutes
The visual analogue scale (VAS) will evaluate pain intensity during radial artery cannulation. This scale is a 10-cm horizontal line with terminal descriptors of 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst imaginable pain) .
upto 10 minutes
Time spent on radial artery cannulation
Time Frame: upto 5 minutes
From the completion of local infiltration anesthesia to the completion of radial artery cannulation, up to 15 minutes.
upto 5 minutes
Success rate of radial artery cannulation
Time Frame: upto 3 months
Success rate will be recorded to evaluate the influences of local anesthesia to radial artery cannulation.
upto 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depth of tested radial artery
Time Frame: upto 5 minutes
Depth of tested radial artery will be recorded to evaluate the influences of local anesthesia to radial artery cannulation.
upto 5 minutes
Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) capacitance difference
Time Frame: upto 5 minutes
PVDF capacitance difference will be recorded to evaluate the influences of local anesthesia to radial artery cannulation.
upto 5 minutes
Heart rate
Time Frame: upto 5 minutes
Heart rate changes will be recorded to supplementally evaluate the pain intensity during the cannulation.
upto 5 minutes
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: upto 5 minutes
Blood Pressure changes will be recorded to supplementally evaluate the pain intensity during the cannulation.
upto 5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Bin Zeng, Master, First People's Hospital of Chenzhou

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

February 20, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Efficiency and Safey of Radial Artery Cannulation

Clinical Trials on Conventional Line-blocking

3
Subscribe