- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05767944
Awake Local Anesthesia Infiltration Compared to Regional Nerve Block for Hand Surgeries
June 17, 2023 updated by: Ain Shams University
Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) Versus Regional Anesthesia With Tourniquet for Hand Flexor Tendon Repair Surgeries in Adults
The study trying to fined out the best anaesthesia technique for hand flexor procedures which provide efficient anaesthesia while providing adequate surgical field exposure & less blood loss
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The current study compared patients scheduled for hand surgical procedures using wide awake local anaesthetic infiltration to those receiving supra-clavicular brachial plexus block.
the comparison including adequacy of pain control, blood loss, patient satisfaction, time & skills needed to provide aesthetic technique.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
50
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 11591
- Ain Shams University Hospitals
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants were included if they were to be scheduled for Flexor tendon repair (Interventions involving flexor tendons of the wrist (Flexor Carpi Ulnaris (FCU), Flexor Carpi Radialis (FCR), and/or Palmaris Longus PL), fingers (flexor digitorum Profundus FDP and/or Flexor Digitorum Superficialis FDS) and thumb (Flexor Pollicis Longus FPL)), aged 18 years or over & of ASA physical status I or II.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants were excluded if they were (American society of Anaesthesia) ASA physical status III or IV, refusal of anaesthetic procedure or refuse to participation in the study, documented hypersensitivity to lidocaine, compromised peripheral circulation (Patients with previous vascular injury, vasculitis, Buerger's disease, and scleroderma), evidence of infection at injection site, patients with ischemic heart disease or psychiatric illness and patients with concomitant injuries that needed further operative procedure under general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Wide Awake Local Anesthesia (WALANT)
Study arm: (WALANT) patient received local anaesthesia (25ml of 2%lidocaine with 0.5 ml of adrenaline (1mg/mL) and 5 ml of 8.4% of sodium bicarbonate.
the final 50 ml mixture contained 10 mg/ml Lidocaine and adrenaline 1:100,000 concentration) infiltration along rays at site of surgery (15 ml or more per ray (150 mg lidocaine) by 27G needle, 10 ml (or more) in the palm, then 2 ml in the proximal and middle phalanges and 1 ml in the distal phalanx (if required )) for hand flexor tendons repair.
|
Infiltration of 150 mg of lidocaine solution per ray at site of surgical incision for flexor tendon repair in the palm, the 2 proximal & distal phalanges
|
|
Active Comparator: Supra Clavicular- Brachial Plexus Block (SC-BPB)
Control arm:(SC-BPB): ultrasound-guided injection of local aesthetics (15 mL of 2% lidocaine and 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine were injected incrementally over 3-5 min) at supra-clavicular level where brachial plexus trunks are located this will provide anesthesia for the whole upper limb distal to shoulder joint.
|
ultrasound-guided infiltration of local aesthetics around brachial plexus trunks & divisions
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intra-operative pain score
Time Frame: duration of operation
|
pain assessment during operation at the following moments: before the injection, during injections , during the incision , during gentle manipulation , during aggressive manipulation and during wound closure.
|
duration of operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
anaesthesia induction time
Time Frame: duration of operation
|
the time taken to provide anesthesia
|
duration of operation
|
|
Blood loss
Time Frame: duration of operation
|
calculated based upon the number and degree of soaking of swabs used in the operation and the amount in a suction container in the operation room.
|
duration of operation
|
|
intra-operative preserved motor power intraoperative
Time Frame: duration of operation
|
surgeon test the motor power after repair of the affected tendon
|
duration of operation
|
|
operative time
Time Frame: duration of operation
|
time from skin incision till last suture applied for wound closure
|
duration of operation
|
|
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 12 hours post operative
|
was measured and recorded using five-point Likert scale[25] (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied) with checklist and a closed-ended question "If you were to undergo this surgery again, would you choose the same type of anaesthesia?
YES or NO "
|
12 hours post operative
|
|
postoperative pain scores
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively
|
numeric pain rating scale (NRS)A respondent selected a whole number (0- 10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his pain, 0-10 was recorded by a blinded investigator at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hours postoperatively, time of 1st call for postoperative analgesia was recorded, patients received 25 mg pethidine IV if the NRS pain exceeds 3, the dose was repeated on patient's demand with 2 hours minimal time interval between doses, total analgesic dose required in the 1st twelve hours postoperatively
|
12 hours postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Salwa O. Mohammed, M.D., Assistant professor, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Medicine
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 29, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 15, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
October 20, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 12, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
March 14, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 22, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 17, 2023
Last Verified
March 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MS 242/2022
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anaesthesia Conduction
-
European Society of AnaesthesiologyNot yet recruitingPaediatric and Adult Patients | Carbon Footprint in Anesthetic | Anaesthesia Conduction
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonCompletedOpioid Free Anaesthesia | Opioid AnaesthesiaFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonCompletedOpioid Free Anaesthesia | Opioid AnaesthesiaFrance
-
Algemeen Stedelijk ZiekenhuisNot yet recruitingPostoperative Opioid-Sparing Effect of a Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block and Opioid-Free Anesthesia.Opioid Free Anaesthesia | Opioid Anaesthesia
-
B. Braun Melsungen AGTigermed Consulting Co., Ltd; B. Braun Medical International Trading Company...CompletedGeneral Anaesthesia | Induction of AnaesthesiaChina
-
Samsun UniversityCompletedAnaesthesia | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | Spinal Anaesthesia | Lumbosacral Spinal StenosisTurkey (Türkiye)
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeNational University of SingaporeActive, not recruiting
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityCompleted
-
Cork University HospitalCompleted
Clinical Trials on local anaesthesia infiltration
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityRecruitingHypersensitivity | Molar Incisor HypomineralizationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Kuopio University HospitalUniversity of Eastern FinlandRecruitingCarpal Tunnel SyndromeFinland
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityRecruitingPain Management | Total Knee ArthroplastyChina
-
Assiut UniversityRecruiting
-
Min LiRecruitingLumbar Degenerative Diseases | Postoperative Acute PainChina
-
University of GiessenCompletedPain PerceptionGermany
-
Aga Khan UniversityCompletedTo Compare ILI/IHG Block to Wound Infiltration for Pain Relief After Hernia RepairPakistan
-
Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research InstituteCompletedPain, Postoperative
-
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Cholecystitis | CholelithiasesTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingMicrovascular Decompression | Liposomal Bupivacaine