Traditional Dietary Advice Versus Low FODMAP Diet in Postprandial Functional Dyspepsia

Randomised Trial of Traditional Dietary Advice Versus a Low FODMAP Diet in Postprandial Functional Dyspepsia

Functional dyspepsia is common, affecting 7.2% of the global population, and associated with substantial health impairment. Almost 80% of patients with functional dyspepsia report meal-related symptoms and are classified as having the postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) variant. However, studies evaluating dietary modifications in PDS are sparse.

The investigators will perform a randomised trial evaluating traditional dietary advice (TDA) vs. a diet low in fermentable fermentable oligo-, di-, mono- saccharides and polyols (low FODMAP diet) in PDS.

70 patients with PDS will be randomly assigned TDA or a low FODMAP diet. The TDA group will be recommended to eat small, regular meals and reduce the intake of caffeine/alcohol/fizzy drinks, fatty/processed/spicy foods, and fibre. The low FODMAP diet group will be advised to exclude fermentable carbohydrates, which are present in wheat-based products, many fruits/vegetables, pulses, beans, dairy, and sweeteners.

Questionnaires are to be completed during the 6-week trial, including self-reported adequate relief of dyspeptic symptoms, and the validated Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale (LPDS), Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and Nepean Dyspepsia Quality of Life Index.

The primary endpoint to define clinical response will be evaluated over weeks 4-6 as >0.5-point reduction in the PDS subscale of the LPDS (calculated as the mean scores for early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal bloating).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Yorkshire
      • Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom, S10 2JF

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fulfil Rome IV symptoms criteria for postprandial functional dyspepsia
  • Normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy within last 3years
  • Online access
  • English literate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Organic gastrointestinal diseases (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease, GI cancer, coeliac disease)
  • Major abdominal surgery (except laparoscopy, appendectomy, cholecystectomy)
  • Documented H.pylori in the last 3 months
  • History of eating disorders
  • Body mass index <20
  • Current dietary interventions
  • Current use of opioids or anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Severe systemic disease (e.g. cardiac, renal, respiratory) necessitating frequent medical consultations)
  • Pregnant
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Scleroderma
  • Memory impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional Dietary Advice
Recommended to eat smaller, regular meals and reduce the intake of caffeine/alcohol/fizzy drinks, fatty/processed/spicy foods, and fibre
TDA and low FODMAP diet
Active Comparator: Low FODMAP diet
FODMAPs are fermentable carbohydrates that increase intestinal water and gas production that, in those with visceral hypersensitivity, induces gastrointestinal symptoms. The low FODMAP diet therefore excludes fermentable carbohydrates, which are present in wheat-based products, many fruits/vegetables, pulses, beans, dairy, and sweeteners.
TDA and low FODMAP diet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of clinical responders between traditional dietary advice vs. a Low FODMAP diet on the leuven postprandial distress scale (LPDS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale (LPDS) assesses the severity of 8 upper gastrointestinal symptoms scored from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). A difference of 0.5 from baseline for the cardinal PDS symptoms (average of first 3 questions) will be used as a cut-off to determine clinical response by comparing average pre-treatment scores with the average score during weeks 4-6.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of clinical responders between traditional dietary advice vs. a low FODMAP diet
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self-reported adequate relief of dyspeptic symptoms as a binary answer (yes or no). A responder will be defined if ≥50% adequate relief of dyspeptic symptoms during weeks 4-6
6 weeks
Changes in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Irritable Bowel syndrome Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale assesses the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, depicting problems with satiety, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, constipation and bloating. Higher scores represent greater symptom severity. Change in scores will be compared within- and between- groups.
6 weeks
Changes in Napean Dyspepsia-related Quality of Life Index
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Napean Dyspepsia Scale is a validated questionnaire assessing dyspepsia-related quality of life syndrome, with higher scores representing worse quality of life. Change in scores will be compared within- and between- groups
6 weeks
Changes in Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale is a validated questionnaire assessing mood, with higher scores representing worse mood. Change in scores will be compared within- and between- groups
6 weeks
Changes in Somatic Symptom reporting
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The validated patient health questionnaire-12 assess extra-intestinal somatic symptoms, with higher scores representing greater somatic symptom severity. Change in scores will be compared within- and between- groups
6 weeks
Changes in nutritional intake
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Comprehensive Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire assesses macronutrient and micronutrient intake, FODMAPs, fibre, starch, glycaemic index/load. Change in scores will be compared within- and between- groups
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STH20655c

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dyspepsia

Clinical Trials on Dietary modifications

3
Subscribe