Prone Positioning and Abdominal Binding on Lung and Muscle Protection in ARDS Patients During Spontaneous Breathing

December 22, 2023 updated by: Rodrigo Cornejo, University of Chile

Effect of Prone Positioning and Abdominal Binding on Lung and Muscle Protection in ARDS Patients With ICU-acquired Weakness Transitioning From Controlled to Spontaneous Breathing

Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction and intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness are two consequences of prolonged mechanical ventilation and critical illness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Both complicate the process of withdrawing mechanical ventilation, increase hospital mortality and cause chronic disability in survivors. During transition from controlled to spontaneous breathing, these complications of critical illness favor an abnormal respiratory pattern and recruit accessory respiratory muscles which may promote additional lung and muscle injury. The type of ventilatory support and positioning may affect the muscle dysfunction and patient-self-inflicted lung injury at spontaneous breathing onset. In that regard, ARDS patients with ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction and ICU-acquired weakness who are transitioning from controlled to partial ventilatory support probably present an abnormal respiratory pattern which exacerbates lung and muscle injury. Physiological-oriented ventilatory approaches based on prone positioning or semi recumbent positioning with abdominal binding at spontaneous breathing onset, could decrease lung and muscle injury by favoring a better neuromuscular efficiency, and preventing intense inspiratory efforts and high transpulmonary driving pressures, as well as high-magnitude pendelluft. In the current project, in addition to perform a multimodal description of the severity of ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction and ICU-acquired weakness in prolonged mechanically ventilated ARDS patients, prone positioning and supine plus thoracoabdominal binding at spontaneous breathing onset will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study protocol will have three steps. The first step is a multimodal description to characterize ICU acquired weakness and ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction in prolonged mechanically ventilated ARDS patients at spontaneous breathing onset. The second step is a crossover clinical trial to test different ventilatory approaches oriented to improve physiological variables related to lung injury and diaphragm performance. The third step is a randomized controlled trial to test the effect of the previous ventilatory approaches on lung inflammatory response and biomarkers of lung and muscular injury.

FIRST STEP: A multimodal physiological description will be performed in pressure support ventilation mode at spontaneous breathing onset. The assessments will include conventional electromyography; electrical activity of the diaphragm; ultrasound of respiratory and non-respiratory muscles; respiratory flow; tidal volume; airway, esophageal and gastric pressures; and hemodynamic and electric impedance tomography monitoring at the end of 2-hours of spontaneous breathing period.

SECOND STEP: A controlled randomized crossover trial will assign patients to three strategies of 2-hours period on pressure support ventilation mode: A.- Control group: supine at 45º, B.- Thoracoabdominal binding: supine at 45º plus thoracoabdominal binding, C.- Prone positioning (without thoracoabdominal binding). These strategies will be performed under standard positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (ARDSNet strategy) and individualized PEEP (obtained at the lowest combination of collapse and overdistension according to electrical impedance tomography), applied in random order. Therefore, each patient will receive the six approaches, with washout periods of 15-minutes in assisted/controlled ventilation.

THIRD STEP: Patients will be randomized to one of the three ventilatory strategies previously defined, A.- Control group: supine at 45º, B.- Thoracoabdominal binding: supine at 45º plus abdominal binding, C.- Prone positioning. These three strategies will be applied under standard PEEP (ARDSNet strategy). Between crossover and pilot randomized controlled trial, the patients will remain under moderate sedation in pressure support ventilation mode receiving an individualized PEEP level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Independencia, Chile
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult ARDS patients with moderate-severe ARDS on controlled protective mechanical ventilation for more than 3 days
  • Stable hemodynamics
  • Level of consciousness enough to initiate spontaneous breathing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable hemodynamics
  • Tracheostomy
  • Abnormal level of consciousness
  • Central nervous system injury
  • Esophageal varices
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindications for installation of electrical impedance tomography or ultrasound assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Control Group
ARDS patients at spontaneous breathing onset on pressure support ventilation mode in supine position at 45º degrees, performed under standard PEEP according to ARDSNet strategy and individualized PEEP applied in random order.
ARDS patients at spontaneous breathing onset on pressure support ventilation mode in supine position at 45º degrees, performed under standard PEEP according to ARDSNet strategy and individualized PEEP applied in random order.
Experimental: Prone Positioning
ARDS patients at spontaneous breathing onset on pressure support ventilation mode in prone position, performed under standard PEEP according to ARDSNet strategy and individualized PEEP applied in random order.
Prone positioning will be performed according to ICU local protocol with trained provider teams.
Experimental: Thoracoabdominal Binding
ARDS patients at spontaneous breathing onset on pressure support ventilation mode in supine position at 45º degrees using thoracoabdominal binding with the binder's upper edge above the costal margin, performed under standard PEEP according to ARDSNet strategy and individualized PEEP applied in random order.
Thoracoabdominal binding will be used in semi-recumbent position (supine at 45º) and titrated to obtain a 20-30% decrease in chest wall compliance and 1-3 cm H2O increase in end-expiratory gastric pressure during steady-state breathing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
(Second Phase) High-Magnitude Pendelluft
Time Frame: Two hours on each ventilatory strategy during phase 2
Frequency of high-magnitude pendelluft monitored by electrical impedance tomography
Two hours on each ventilatory strategy during phase 2
(Third Phase) Change in Inflammatory Biomarkers Measured by ELISA (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-18, IL-1β, Caspase-1, RAGE, Angiopoietin-1 and 2) and change in oxidative stress related biomarkers (F2 isoprostane)
Time Frame: At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3
ELISA-based detection of inflammatory biomarkers (absolute and ratios) and oxidative stress related biomarkers (absolute and ratios) measured in plasma and in exhaled breath condensate
At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3
(Third Phase) Change in Regional Lung Inflammation
Time Frame: At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3
Regional lung inflammation will be evaluated with dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography of fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) net uptake rate
At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3
(Third Phase) Change in Fast-Twitch Skeletal Muscle Troponin I Measured by ELISA
Time Frame: At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3
ELISA-based detection of fast-twitch skeletal muscle troponin I measured in plasma
At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
(Second Phase) Respiratory Mechanics Variables
Time Frame: Two hours on each ventilatory strategy during phase 2
Esophageal pressure swing, transdiaphragmatic pressure and transpulmonary driving pressure measured by a esophageal/gastric catheter
Two hours on each ventilatory strategy during phase 2
(Third Phase) Change in High-Magnitude Pendelluft
Time Frame: At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3
Frequency of high-magnitude pendelluft monitored by electrical impedance tomography
At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3
(Third Phase) Change in Respiratory Mechanics Variables
Time Frame: At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3
Esophageal pressure swing, transdiaphragmatic pressure and transpulmonary driving pressure measured by a esophageal/gastric catheter
At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3
(Third Phase) Change in Neuromechanical Coupling of Diaphragm
Time Frame: At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3
Change in neuromechanical coupling of diaphragm, which corresponds to the ratio between transdiaphragmatic pressure and electrical activity of the diaphragm measured by a esophageal/gastric catheter
At baseline and after 24 hours of each ventilatory strategy during phase 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rodrigo Cornejo, University of Chile

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Prone Positioning

3
Subscribe