CanRestoreFunction Cancer-related Fatigue ( CRF ) (CRF)

May 11, 2023 updated by: Anne Fleischer, University of Cincinnati

CanRestoreFunction: Cancer-Related Fatigue Management

The goal of this randomized control trial is to determine if participating in an 8-week online cancer-related fatigue management intervention consisting of individualized exercise program, one-on-one goal setting and action plan development and interactive educational module will significantly reduce the perception of cancer-related fatigue, improve the quality of life, improve perceived cognition, and perceived function of breast cancer compared to a wait-list control group. The aim the project is to determine if an online cancerrelated fatigue management program is associated with 1. A decrease in cancer-related fatigue. 2. An improved perception of their ability and satisfaction in completing important activities 3. Greater quality of life. 4. Improved mobility 5. Improved perceived cognition

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • been diagnosed with any type of cancer within 5 years of enrollment,
  • received chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy
  • have access to mobile device or computer
  • have basic computer or mobile device skills,
  • have a significant level of fatigue defined as >3 on 0-10 scale using the Oneitem Fatigue Scale

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have metastatic cancer (Stage 4),
  • do not have a signed medical release by their physician or physician extender indicating that the participant can safely participate in the exercise program,
  • chronic fatigue prior to cancer diagnosis, such as fibromyalgia
  • are unable to follow verbal or written assessment instructions, are non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exercise, Problem-Solving and Education
Individualized exercise program Weekly Goals setting and problem-solving session to create a weekly action plan Four Assigned interactive educational modules
Complete assigned exercises three times a week Complete Action plan co-developed Complete part or all of one of the four interactive educational modules
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants will complete their daily routines as they typically do.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief Fatigue Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline
This 9-item scale assesses the severity and interference of fatigue based on a 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (greatest fatigue) scale
Baseline
Brief Fatigue Inventory
Time Frame: 4-week
This 9-item scale assesses the severity and interference of fatigue based on a 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (greatest fatigue) scale
4-week
Brief Fatigue Inventory
Time Frame: 8-week
This 9-item scale assesses the severity and interference of fatigue based on a 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (greatest fatigue) scale
8-week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
Time Frame: Baseline
The OT administers the COPM, which is a semi-structured interview to understand the routine activities that the participant completes daily, specifically their self-care, leisure, and social activities. The participant rates the importance of each of the activities using a 0 to 10 scale. Zero indicates "no importance" and 10 indicates "very important." Then the participant separately rates their perception of how well they currently perform each of the important activities and how satisfied they are with their performance using a 0 to 10 scale. Zero indicates that "they are not able to perform" or "they are not satisfied" and 10 indicates that "they are able to perform the activity well" or "they are very satisfied."
Baseline
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
Time Frame: 4-week
The OT administers the COPM, which is a semi-structured interview to understand the routine activities that the participant completes daily, specifically their self-care, leisure, and social activities. The participant rates the importance of each of the activities using a 0 to 10 scale. Zero indicates "no importance" and 10 indicates "very important." Then the participant separately rates their perception of how well they currently perform each of the important activities and how satisfied they are with their performance using a 0 to 10 scale. Zero indicates that "they are not able to perform" or "they are not satisfied" and 10 indicates that "they are able to perform the activity well" or "they are very satisfied."
4-week
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
Time Frame: 8-week
The OT administers the COPM, which is a semi-structured interview to understand the routine activities that the participant completes daily, specifically their self-care, leisure, and social activities. The participant rates the importance of each of the activities using a 0 to 10 scale. Zero indicates "no importance" and 10 indicates "very important." Then the participant separately rates their perception of how well they currently perform each of the important activities and how satisfied they are with their performance using a 0 to 10 scale. Zero indicates that "they are not able to perform" or "they are not satisfied" and 10 indicates that "they are able to perform the activity well" or "they are very satisfied."
8-week
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline
This 40-item 5-point Likert scale (0=Not at all 1=A little bit 2=Somewhat 3= Quite a bit 4=Very much) evaluates quality of life in individuals with fatigue as measured in 5 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and fatigue. Higher scores reflect greater quality of life
Baseline
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue
Time Frame: 4-weeks
This 40-item 5-point Likert scale (0=Not at all 1=A little bit 2=Somewhat 3= Quite a bit 4=Very much) evaluates quality of life in individuals with fatigue as measured in 5 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and fatigue. Higher scores reflect greater quality of life
4-weeks
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue
Time Frame: 8-weeks
This 40-item 5-point Likert scale (0=Not at all 1=A little bit 2=Somewhat 3= Quite a bit 4=Very much) evaluates quality of life in individuals with fatigue as measured in 5 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and fatigue. Higher scores reflect greater quality of life
8-weeks
PROMIS Cognitive Function Ability 8a
Time Frame: Baseline
This 8-item 5-point Likert scale [Never, Rarely (Once) Sometimes (Two or three times) Often (About once a day) Very often (Several times a day)] evaluates patient-perceived cognitive abilities, its interference with daily functioning, whether other people observe cognitive impairments, and its impact on quality of life
Baseline
PROMIS Cognitive Function Ability 8a
Time Frame: 4-weeks
This 8-item 5-point Likert scale [Never, Rarely (Once) Sometimes (Two or three times) Often (About once a day) Very often (Several times a day)] evaluates patient-perceived cognitive abilities, its interference with daily functioning, whether other people observe cognitive impairments, and its impact on quality of life
4-weeks
PROMIS Cognitive Function Ability 8a
Time Frame: 8-weeks
This 8-item 5-point Likert scale [Never, Rarely (Once) Sometimes (Two or three times) Often (About once a day) Very often (Several times a day)] evaluates patient-perceived cognitive abilities, its interference with daily functioning, whether other people observe cognitive impairments, and its impact on quality of life
8-weeks
Promis Applied Cognitive Abilities 8a
Time Frame: Baseline
This 8-item 5-point Likert scale [Not at all A little bit, Somewhat, Quite a bit, Very much] evaluates the patient-perceived cognitive deficits
Baseline
Promis Applied Cognitive Abilities 8a
Time Frame: 4-weeks
This 8-item 5-point Likert scale [Not at all A little bit, Somewhat, Quite a bit, Very much] evaluates the patient-perceived cognitive deficits
4-weeks
Promis Applied Cognitive Abilities 8a
Time Frame: 8-weeks
This 8-item 5-point Likert scale [Not at all A little bit, Somewhat, Quite a bit, Very much] evaluates the patient-perceived cognitive deficits
8-weeks
6-minute walk test
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants completes a 6-minute walk at their chosen pace and with permitted standing rest breaks
Baseline
6-minute walk test
Time Frame: 4-weeks
Participants completes a 6-minute walk at their chosen pace and with permitted standing rest breaks
4-weeks
6-minute walk test
Time Frame: 8-weeks
Participants completes a 6-minute walk at their chosen pace and with permitted standing rest breaks
8-weeks
30 second sit to stand
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants are seated in a standard height fixed chair without armrests, which is placed against a wall. They will move from sitting to standing and back to sitting position, with arms crossed against chest. The number of complete stands and sits
Baseline
30 second sit to stand
Time Frame: 4-weeks
Participants are seated in a standard height fixed chair without armrests, which is placed against a wall. They will move from sitting to standing and back to sitting position, with arms crossed against chest. The number of complete stands and sits
4-weeks
30 second sit to stand
Time Frame: 8-weeks
Participants are seated in a standard height fixed chair without armrests, which is placed against a wall. They will move from sitting to standing and back to sitting position, with arms crossed against chest. The number of complete stands and sits
8-weeks
Average number of steps
Time Frame: Week 1
Fitbit will track the number of steps that the participants takes each day
Week 1
Average number of steps
Time Frame: Week 2
Fitbit will track the number of steps that the participants takes each day
Week 2
Average number of steps
Time Frame: Week 3
Fitbit will track the number of steps that the participants takes each day
Week 3
Average number of steps
Time Frame: Week 4
Fitbit will track the number of steps that the participants takes each day
Week 4
Average number of steps
Time Frame: Week 5
Fitbit will track the number of steps that the participants takes each day
Week 5
Average number of steps
Time Frame: Week 6
Fitbit will track the number of steps that the participants takes each day
Week 6
Average number of steps
Time Frame: Week 7
Fitbit will track the number of steps that the participants takes each day
Week 7
Average number of steps
Time Frame: Week 8
Fitbit will track the number of steps that the participants takes each day
Week 8
Average heart rate
Time Frame: Week 1
Fitbit will track daily heart rate of each participant
Week 1
Average heart rate
Time Frame: Week 2
Fitbit will track daily heart rate of each participant
Week 2
Average heart rate
Time Frame: Week 3
Fitbit will track daily heart rate of each participant
Week 3
Average heart rate
Time Frame: Week 4
Fitbit will track daily heart rate of each participant
Week 4
Average heart rate
Time Frame: Week 5
Fitbit will track daily heart rate of each participant
Week 5
Average heart rate
Time Frame: Week 6
Fitbit will track daily heart rate of each participant
Week 6
Average heart rate
Time Frame: Week 7
Fitbit will track daily heart rate of each participant
Week 7
Average heart rate
Time Frame: Week 8
Fitbit will track daily heart rate of each participant
Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne Fleischer, Ph.D, University of Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Exercise, Problem-Solving Session and Education

3
Subscribe