Massage Percussion for Passage of Urolithiasis Fragments After Ureteroscopy.

May 22, 2025 updated by: Ryan Hsi, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Massage Percussion Therapy for Passage of Urolithiasis Fragments After Ureteroscopy

Flexible ureteroscopy is characterized as first-line therapy for renal stones < 2 cm in size. Stones are commonly treated with dusting or fragmentation techniques which requires passage of stone fragments after surgery. Quoted stone free rate after flexible ureteroscopy is approximately 40-60% with a dusting technique. Residual fragments are often under 1mm in size and can layer in the lower pole of the kidney, complicating spontaneous stone passage. Improving the stone free rate after surgery decreases the need for secondary surgeries and decreases risk of future stone events.

Numerous techniques have been proposed to increase stone passage including positional changes and percussion therapy. To date, there is overall limited data a lack of techniques that can be readily available in the outpatient setting, easily added to scheduled appointments, reproducible results and well tolerated by patients.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Researchers in China have developed a proprietary oscillation machine to be used in an outpatient setting. The External Physical Vibration Lithecbole (EPVL) is used to provide vibration after stone fragmentation to facilitate movement of fragments into a more favorable orientation for stone passage. After extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy, use of EPVL after surgery has been shown to increase stone free rate.

Chest percussion for cystic fibrosis patients has been adapted for use after ureteroscopy. After undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, patients are placed in a percussion physiotherapy vest, given diuretics and positioned in Trendelenburg. Imaging obtained before and after percussion demonstrates successful stone movement and increases stone free rates in several different protocols compared to patients who do not receive percussive therapy.

Percussion therapy is clearly effective to improve stone free rates after ureteroscopy and is effective regardless of technique, protocol, or percussive device. However, proposed techniques with EPVL and chest physiotherapy vests can be expensive, cumbersome and require specialty equipment. In addition, proposed equipment in prior studies is not readily available in outpatient clinics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montréal, Canada
        • University of Montreal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient after treatment of renal stones with ureteroscopy during which residual stone fragments (less than 2mm by surgeon estimation) is left in the kidney.
  • Must be 18 years or older
  • Must be able to give consent
  • Preoperative abdominal CT

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On pharmacologic anticoagulation. Aspirin up to 81mg will be allowed.
  • Cannot tolerate flank, prone or Trendelenburg position.
  • Cannot tolerate percussion.
  • History of acute rib fractures or osteopenia/osteoporosis.
  • Any patient who is on a fluid intake restriction.
  • Pregnancy
  • Untreated UTI
  • History of struvite stones
  • Requiring a planned secondary stone procedure within 90 days
  • If stent must stay in longer than 10 days
  • Ureteral stones (without renal stones)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Patient receives standard postoperative care with no percussion therapy.
Experimental: PACU percussion
Patient receives percussion therapy in the PACU immediately after surgery.
Using massage percussion postoperatively.
Experimental: Postoperative appointment percussion
Patient receives percussion therapy in the office on the day of follow up.
Using massage percussion postoperatively.
Experimental: Both PACU and Postop appointment percussion.
Patient receives percussion therapy in the PACU and receives percussion therapy in the office on the day of follow up.
Using massage percussion postoperatively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients who are able to tolerate and complete the percussion therapy.
Time Frame: Postop day 0-10.
If patients can tolerate the percussion therapy in the treatment arms. This is evaluated by patients being able to complete the percussion therapy session and completing pain questionnaires.
Postop day 0-10.
Stone Free Rate.
Time Frame: 6 weeks after surgery.
Patients will have standard postoperative imaging at six weeks, as is standard of care. Presence of stone fragments and fragment size will determine the postoperative stone free rate.
6 weeks after surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
weight of passed stone fragments
Time Frame: 6 weeks.
PAtients will strain urine to collect stone fragments after surgery until stent removal. The stone fragments will be sent for stone analysis, as is standard of care, during which fragments will be weighed.
6 weeks.
Unplanned return visits.
Time Frame: 6 weeks.
Follow patients who have unplanned return trips to the ED or the clinic for pain or complications after surgery.
6 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ryan Hsi, VUmc

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nephrolithiasis

Clinical Trials on Massage Percussion Therapy device

Subscribe