Foveal Sparing ILM Peeling With ILM Flap Transposition

June 10, 2023 updated by: Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery

Foveal sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling with ILM flap transposition over the macular hole combines the benefits of foveal sparing ILM peeling with ILM flap techniques.

Aim of this study is to retrospectively examine the rate of postsurgical macular hole closure, development of central atrophy in the foveal area, and improvement of best corrected distant visual acuity in a group of patients having undergone foveal sparing ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition for macular hole repair.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Idiopathic full thickness macular holes lead to central defects in the visual field and to deterioration of the visual acuity. Introduction of internal limiting membrane (ILM) Peeling techniques lead to significant increase in closure rates of the macular holes.

Foveal sparing ILM peeling represents a surgical technique for macular hole repair with less surgical trauma with high closure rates of the macular hole, compared to classic ILM Peeling [Ho et al. 2014, Murphy et al 2019]. The combination of foveal sparing ILM Peeling with the established ILM flap techniques [Michalewska et al 2010 und 2015] offers the potential of better improvement in postsurgical visual acuity with the high closure rates, due to ILM flaps.

Aim of this study is to retrospectively examine the rate of postsurgical macular hole closure, development of central atrophy in the foveal area, and improvement of best corrected distant visual acuity in a group of patients having undergone foveal sparing ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition for macular hole repair.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1140
        • Hanusch Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The participants will be selected by the clinical investigators in the Hanusch Hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Vitrectomy with foveal sparing ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition in the time period from 1.10.2020 to 8.7.2022
  • Age 18 and older
  • Idiopathic full thickness macular hole as indication for surgery
  • Full follow-up, including visual acuity testing and OCT preoperative, and 3 months after surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
study group
retrospective data analysis of patients that underwent after foveal sparing ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition for macular hole repair
Macular hole closure rate, visual acuity and OCT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
macular hole closure rate
Time Frame: up to 3 months after surgery
postsurgical closure of macular holes is examined from routine postsurgical optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging
up to 3 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual acuity
Time Frame: 3 months
visual acuity before and 3 months after surgery is examined
3 months
OCT
Time Frame: 3 months
measurements of macular hole diameters from presurgical OCTs and restoration of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) 3 months after surgery is analysed
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oliver Findl, Prof., head of departement

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FSI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Full Thickness Macular Hole

Clinical Trials on retrospective data analysis

3
Subscribe