The Effects of Gait Performance and Brain Activity After Robot-assisted Gait Training (RAGT) On Patients With Lower Extremity Thermal Injury

August 15, 2023 updated by: So Young Joo, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital

The Effects of Gait Performance and Brain Activity After Robot-assisted Gait Training (RAGT) On Patients With Lower Extremity Thermal Injury : a Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Study

Gait enables individuals to move forward and is considered a natural skill. Gait disturbances are very common in patients with burn injury. Major causes of gait disturbances are pain and joint contractures. Recent studies focused on the application of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) for improving gait functions. This study aimed to elucidate the efficacy and investigate the mechanism of motor recovery after RAGT on patients with lower extremity burn. To investigate the clinical effects, the investigators compare the results of RAGT group to the results of matched conventional (CON) rehabilitation group.This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial involved 40 patients with lower extremity burns. Patients were randomized into a RAGT or a CON group. SUBAR® (CRETEM, Korea) is a exoskeletal-robot with a footplate that assists patients to perform gait motions. RAGT enables training of automatically programmed normal gait pattern. Patients underwent 30 min of RAGT using SUBAR® and conventional exercise rehabilitation each for 30 min once a day for 5 days a week for 8 weeks. The CON group focused on gait training such as active range of motion (ROM) exercise, weight bearing training, manual lymphatic drainage, and hypertrophic scar care for 60 min once a day for 5 days a week for 8 weeks.A wearable functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) device has been developed for studying cortical hemodynamics. Changes in cortical activity has not previously been documented in patients with burn injury. The primary outcome was the prefrontal cortical activity in the both groups. The walking-related cortical activity using an fNIRS device before and after 8 weeks training were measured. To evaluate functional recovery, functional ambulation category (FAC) scores and 6-minute walking test (6MWT) distances were measured. Numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to rate the degree of subjective pain during gait movement: 0 points were assigned when no pain was noted, and unbearable pain was assigned 10 points.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Gait enables individuals to move forward and is considered a natural skill. Gait disturbances are very common in patients with burn injury. Major causes of gait disturbances are pain and joint contractures. Recent studies focused on the application of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) for improving gait functions. This study aimed to elucidate the efficacy and investigate the mechanism of motor recovery after RAGT on patients with lower extremity burn. To investigate the clinical effects, the investigators compare the results of RAGT group to the results of matched conventional (CON) rehabilitation group.This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial involved 40 patients with lower extremity burns. Patients were randomized into a RAGT or a CON group. SUBAR® (CRETEM, Korea) is a exoskeletal-robot with a footplate that assists patients to perform gait motions. RAGT enables training of automatically programmed normal gait pattern. Patients underwent 30 min of RAGT using SUBAR® and conventional exercise rehabilitation each for 30 min once a day for 5 days a week for 8 weeks. The CON group focused on gait training such as active range of motion (ROM) exercise, weight bearing training, manual lymphatic drainage, and hypertrophic scar care for 60 min once a day for 5 days a week for 8 weeks.A wearable functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) device has been developed for studying cortical hemodynamics. Changes in cortical activity has not previously been documented in patients with burn injury. The primary outcome was the prefrontal cortical activity in the both groups. The walking-related cortical activity using an fNIRS device before and after 8 weeks training were measured. To evaluate functional recovery, functional ambulation category (FAC) scores and 6-minute walking test (6MWT) distances were measured. Numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to rate the degree of subjective pain during gait movement: 0 points were assigned when no pain was noted, and unbearable pain was assigned 10 points.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with full or virtually full thickness involvement of >50% on the body surface area of the bilateral lower extremity
  • age > 18 years
  • with ≤1 functional ambulation category (FAC) score ≤ 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with cognitive disorders
  • intellectual impairment before burn injury
  • serious cardiac dysfunction
  • problems with weight bearing due to unstable fractures
  • body weight ≥100 kg
  • severe fixed contracture
  • skin disorders that could be worsened by RAGT and conventional rehabilitation
  • patients with severe pain who were unable to undergo conventional rehabilitation programs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: robot assisted gait training
RAGT enables training of automatically programmed normal gait pattern. Patients underwent 30 min of RAGT using SUBAR® and conventional exercise rehabilitation each for 30 min once a day for 5 days a week for 8 weeks.
SUBAR® (CRETEM, Korea) is a exoskeletal-robot with a footplate that assists gait movements. The patient's thigh length and lower leg length were measured before training, so that the SUBAR® can be adjusted to patient's size to ensure accurate training. During training, the therapist facilitated the treatment and stood by the patients' side to adjust the direction and speed. RAGT is programmed automatically, and it can be performed regularly over a long period. The patients received 30 min of robot-assisted training using SUBAR® once a day for 5 days a week for 8 weeks. Each training session lasted up to 40 min.
Active Comparator: conventioanl training
The conventional training group focused on gait training such as active range of motion (ROM) exercise, weight bearing training, manual lymphatic drainage, and hypertrophic scar care for 60 min once a day for 5 days a week for 8 weeks.
Patients also received conventional exercise rehabilitation with the same duration and frequency. Conventional rehabilitation therapy, which consisted of active assistive knee exercises, knee stretching, patellar mobilization exercises, and quadriceps setting exercises, was performed every day throughout the rehabilitation period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
near infrared spectroscopy
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The rest period before gait period served as a baseline reference for osyhemoglobin of PFC perfusion. Cortical activity was measured by evaluating relative changes in oxyhemoglobin level and deoxyhemoglobin level.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
numeric rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
rate the degree of subjective pain during gait movement: 0 points were assigned when no pain was noted, and unbearable pain was assigned 10 points.
8 weeks
functional ambulatory category
Time Frame: 8 weeks
FAC was evaluated based on six scales. Scale 0 means that the patient cannot walk or can only walk with assistance of two people. Scale 5 means that the patient can walk independently.
8 weeks
6 minutes walking test
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Patients were instructed to walk as far as possible in 6 min
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: SO YOUNG JOO, MD, handgang sacred heart hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gait Disorder, Sensorimotor

Clinical Trials on robot assited gati training

Subscribe