Comparison of Robot Assisted Thoracic Surgery With Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Case of Lung Cancer

October 6, 2017 updated by: Veerle Van Mossevelde, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Comparison of Robot Assisted Thoracic Surgery With Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Case of Lung Cancer: a Prospective Trial With Control Group

In this study the investigator will compare the effectiveness of robot assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in case of lung cancer.

The perioperative circumstances and postoperative outcome will be compared.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants are randomly subdivided (1:1) to either undergo robot assisted lobectomy or video assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in case of lung cancer. At the end of both surgical interventions the anaesthesiologist administers the same technique of pain relief: paravertebral blockage.

The data that are going to be investigated are: operative time, conversion to spreading of the ribs/thoracotomy, blood loss, lymph node dissection, prolonged air leak, chest tube drainage, length of stay, inflammatory reaction (through inflammatory parameters CRP, IL-3, IL-6, TNF), lung recuperation (through a lung function test) and postoperative pain (VAS score questionnaire).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must be 18 years old or older
  • Patients can be male or female
  • Patients with a lung tumour which is treatable with surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Inoperable lung tumour
  • Patients which are at risk for general anaesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Robot assisted thoracic surgery
RATS
The lobectomy will be preformed in case of an operable lung cancer. The thoracic surgery technique used is video assisted thoracic surgery.
Other Names:
  • VATS
Active Comparator: Video assisted thoracic surgery
VATS
The lobectomy will be preformed in case of an operable lung cancer. The thoracic surgery technique used is robot assisted thoracic surgery
Other Names:
  • RATS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 2 months
0 = no pain 10 = unbearable pain: VASscore
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
blood loss
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
ml
up to 4 hours
operative time
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
duration of surgery
up to 4 hours
conversion to spreading of the ribs/thoracotomy
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
0 = no 1 = yes
up to 4 hours
lymph node dissection
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
number of lymph nodes
up to 4 hours
prolonged air leak
Time Frame: up to 7 days
chest tube present longer than usual
up to 7 days
chest tube drainage
Time Frame: up to 7 days
ml
up to 7 days
length of stay
Time Frame: up to 7 days
duration of hospitalisation after surgery
up to 7 days
pulmonary function
Time Frame: 2 months
recovery of function of the operated lung
2 months
Inflammatory reaction
Time Frame: 48 hours
these inflammatory parameters will be determined: C-reactive protein; IL-3; IL-6; TNF
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Wietske Renckens, MD, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
  • Principal Investigator: Dirk Smets, MD, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
  • Study Director: Eef Vanderhelst, MD, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Video assited thoracic surgery

3
Subscribe