Radial Artery Versus No-touch Saphenous Vein

Graft Patency Between the Radial Artery and the No-touch Saphenous Vein in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Study (GRAFT-CAB Study)

This study evaluates the short-term and long-term patency of the radial artery and the No-touch vein in patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. A total of at least 774 patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump CABG will be consecutively recruited from Fuwai Hospital and randomly assigned to receive radial artery or No-touch saphenous vein as their second graft. All participants will be invited for clinical follow-up and 64-slice multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) analysis at 3 months and 12 months post-operatively.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

CABG is still the treatment of choice for ischemic heart disease. However, restenosis or occlusion may occur to graft vessels, leading to postoperative myocardial ischemia and subsequent clinical events. Long-term angiographic follow-up demonstrated that vein graft restenosis and occlusion are common among those receiving CABG, with a vein graft patency of less than 50% at 15 years postoperatively.

A novel approach to harvesting the vein is called "No-touch" technique (NT), which can avoid mechanical damage to the vein wall. Previous studies showed that No-touch saphenous vein grafts (NT-SVG) has a 96.3% postoperative graft patency rate at 12 months, compared to 93.5% of conventional saphenous vein grafts (con-SVGs). Thus, the No-touch technique can significantly reduce postoperative graft occlusion. Radial artery(RA) as an arterial material for CABG surgery has a better long-term patency than con-SVG, up to 83% at 10 years. Using radial artery as the second graft for CABG may provide additional clinical benefit. However, the risk of perioperative vasospasm and graft occlusion due to competitive blood flow limit the using of radial artery. Therefore, only the No-touch vein and the radial artery can improve the graft patency. Only one randomized clinical trial(RCT) compared the RA and NT-vein, and this study is limited by irregular post-operative management and small sample size from single center.

This prospective single-center study aims to compare the short-term and long-term graft patency between the No-touch vein and the radial artery. This study will consecutively enroll at least 774 patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump CABG. After obtaining informed written consent, participants will be randomly allocated to either the No-touch or the radial artery group. At baseline, participants will be interviewed to collect detailed information about on demographics, socioeconomic status, cardiovascular risk factors, clinical characteristics, treatments, in-hospital outcomes, general and disease-specific quality of life, function and mental status. During the follow-ups, the investigators will collect information about clinical outcomes events, long-term treatments, function, quality of life, symptoms, and medical care during the recovery period. All participants will be invited for 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) analysis at 3 months and 12 months post-operatively for graft patency evaluation.

The data adjudicators and computed tomography(CT) reviewers will be blinded to the study. Due to the nature of this study, the operating surgeons, anesthetists and other operative room staff will not be blind in this study. Owing to the use of radial artery need approved by the participant, so participants will also not be blind in this study,

By comparing the short-term and long-term graft patency between the No-touch vein and radial artery groups, this study will contribute major evidence of the possible superiority between two different grafts, so as to improve patient outcomes after CABG surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

774

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100037
        • Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academay of Medical Science and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age more than 18 years old
  • First time undergo isolated CABG surgery
  • Severe three-vessel disease (Left anterior decending artery, Left circumflex artery, Right coronoary artery lesion with more than 75% stenosis)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Urgent or Redo CABG surgery
  • Concomitant cardiac or vascular procedures (i.e. valve repair or replacement, Morrow procedure)
  • A positive Allen test, radial artery plaque on ultrasound or a history of vasculitis or Raynaud's syndrome
  • Varicose great saphenous vein or venous tortuosity and judged as can not be used in operation by surgeons
  • Known allergy to radiographic contrast media
  • Planed endarterectomy of coronary artery before surgery
  • Malignant tumor or other severe systemic diseases
  • Combined with other irreversible organ failures
  • Contraindications for dual antiplatelet therapy, such as active gastroduodenal ulcer
  • Participant of other ongoing clinical trials in 30 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: No-Touch vein
No-touch vein group has two No-touch saphenous vein grafts, anastomose to the right coronary or left coronary system. All patients also acquired LITA-LAD anastomosis to complete the revascularization.
Two No-touch saphenous vein grafts anastomose to the right coronary and left coronary system. All participants also acquired Left intrathoracic artery(LITA)-left anterior decending artery(LAD) anastomosis to complete the revascularization.
Active Comparator: Radial artery
Radial artery group has one radial artery graft and one conventional saphenous vein graft, anastomose to the right coronary or left coronary system basing on surgeons' decision. All patients also acquired LITA-LAD anastomosis to complete the revascularization.
One radial artery graft and one conventional saphenous vein graft anastomose to the right coronary or left coronary system basing on surgeons' decision. All participants also acquired Left intrathoracic artery(LITA)-left anterior decending artery(LAD) anastomosis to complete the revascularization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of graft patency
Time Frame: 12 months after procedure
All participants will be invited to return to their operating hospitals for 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography angiography to determine patencies of the graft vessels.
12 months after procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of graft patency
Time Frame: 3 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
All participants will be invited to return to their operating hospitals for 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography angiography to determine patencies of the graft vessels.
3 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Overall major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rate
Time Frame: 3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
MACCE includes death, myocardial infarction, stroke and/or repeat revascularization
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Cardiac death
Time Frame: 3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Death from any heart disease
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Documented non-lethal myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Myocardial infarction is defined according to the most recent guideline
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Stroke
Time Frame: 3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
An acute symptomatic episode of focal or global neurological dysfunction caused by brain, spinal, or retinal vascular injury as a result of hemorrhage or infarction
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Target lesion revascularization
Time Frame: 3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Recurrence of Angina
Time Frame: 3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Recurrence of Angina
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on No-touch vein graft

Subscribe