- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06029049
Comparison of Intubation Conditions During Rapid Sequence Induction Obtained With Modified Time Principal Induction With a Standard Intubation Dose of Rocuronium Versus Succinylcholine
November 27, 2023 updated by: Lauren Nakazawa, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Comparison of Intubation Conditions During Rapid Sequence Induction Obtained With Modified Time Principal Induction With a Standard Intubation Dose of Rocuronium Versus Succinylcholine : A Prospective Non-inferiority Randomized and Blind Trial
The purpose of this study is to assess and compare conditions for tracheal intubation obtained with modified time principal induction with 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium and 1 mg/kg succinylcholine.
Specifically, the investigators will be evaluating ease of laryngoscopy, vocal cord view, vocal cord opening, and movement of limbs and coughing during tracheal intubation in order to assess intubation conditions, to compare efficiency and success rate of tracheal intubation between two induction agents and to determine the rate of patient awareness during induction and post-operative recall of paralysis.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
152
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Lauren M Nakazawa, MD,MBA
- Phone Number: 713-500-6775
- Email: Lauren.M.Nakazawa@uth.tmc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ellie Tuchaai
- Phone Number: 713.614.9355
- Email: Ellie.J.Tuchaai@uth.tmc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Recruiting
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
Contact:
- Lauren M Nakazawa, MD,MBA
- Phone Number: 713-500-6775
- Email: Lauren.M.Nakazawa@uth.tmc.edu
-
Contact:
- Ellie Tuchaai
- Phone Number: 713.614.9355
- Email: Ellie.J.Tuchaai@uth.tmc.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- BMI > 30kg/m2 or Mallampati class III or IV.
- Requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Acute and chronic respiratory disorders, including Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) and asthma.
- The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification > III.
- Patients requiring awake intubation.
- Pregnant women.
- Untreated ischemic heart disease.
- Patients requiring an induction dose of propofol < 1 mg/kg.
- Allergy to propofol, rocuronium, succinylcholine, or sugammadex.
- Patients with renal failure and unknown potassium (K+) level, or patients with K+ level > 5.0
- Personal history of malignant hyperthermia (MH), or family history of MH
- Patients with suspected or diagnosed neuromuscular disease, patients with burn injuries
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Modified Time Principle Induction (MTPI) with rocuronium
|
Participants will be induced using lidocaine 1 mg/kg IV, an opioid such a fentanyl (1-2 mcg/kg) IV, followed by 0.6 mg/kg IV rocuronium, and IV propofol with dosage at the discretion of the care team, administered within 10 seconds of rocuronium and the intubation will be performed with a C-MAC
|
Active Comparator: RSI with succinylcholine
|
Participants will be induced as per routine care using lidocaine 1 mg/kg IV, an opioid such a fentanyl (1-2 mcg/kg) IV, propofol 1-2 mg/kg IV, and succinylcholine 1mg/kg IV, and the intubation will be performed with a C-MAC
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Ease of laryngoscopy
Time Frame: During procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))
|
Ease of laryngoscopy is scored categorically as easy (Jaw relaxed, no resistance to blade during laryngoscopy) , fair (Jaw not fully relaxed, some resistance to blade) or difficult (Poor jaw relaxation, active resistance by patient to laryngoscopy)
|
During procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))
|
Position of vocal cords
Time Frame: During procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))
|
Position of vocal cords is scored categorically as abducted, intermediate or closed
|
During procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))
|
Movement of vocal cords
Time Frame: During procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))
|
Movement of vocal cords is scored categorically as none , moving or closing
|
During procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))
|
Number of participants who moved their limbs during intubation
Time Frame: During procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))
|
none, slight or vigorous
|
During procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))
|
number of participants who coughed during tracheal intubation
Time Frame: During procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))
|
none, diaphragm or sustained (>10s)
|
During procedure (Between laryngoscope insertion to onset of ventilation (less than 7 minutes))
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
|
from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
|
|
Oxygen saturation (SpO2)
Time Frame: from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
|
from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
|
|
Number of participants for whom tracheal intubations were successful on the first attempt
Time Frame: 5 minutes after intubation and successful ventilation
|
5 minutes after intubation and successful ventilation
|
|
Number of times tracheal intubations are attempted
Time Frame: 5 minutes after intubation and successful ventilation
|
5 minutes after intubation and successful ventilation
|
|
Number of participants for whom tracheal intubations failed
Time Frame: After 3 failed intubation attempts (less than 7 minutes from start of intubation)
|
After 3 failed intubation attempts (less than 7 minutes from start of intubation)
|
|
Airway view at the time of laryngoscopy as categorized by the modified Cormack-Lehane classification (before external manipulation)
Time Frame: from start of induction to 5 minutes of successful ventilation
|
Data is reported categorically as follows 1(Full view of glottis),2a(Partial view of glottis), 2b(Only posterior extremity of glottis seen or only arytenoid cartilages), 3(Only epiglottis seen, none of glottis seen) and 4(Neither glottis nor epiglottis seen)
|
from start of induction to 5 minutes of successful ventilation
|
Satisfaction of providers with intubating conditions
Time Frame: from 5 minutes of successful ventilation
|
Providers will answer yes or no for satisfaction
|
from 5 minutes of successful ventilation
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
|
from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
|
from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
|
|
End-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2)
Time Frame: from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
|
from the start of induction drug administration to about 5 minutes after successful ventilation
|
|
Number of participants that had injury associated with intubation
Time Frame: within 24 hours after surgery
|
Injury is defined as injury to dentition, lips, tongue, and pharyngeal bleeding.
|
within 24 hours after surgery
|
Number of participants with muscle paralysis awareness prior to loss of consciousness as assessed by the Post Anesthesia Care Unit Survey of Modified Time Principle Induction
Time Frame: within 24 hours after surgery
|
within 24 hours after surgery
|
|
Number of participants who had presence of sore throat as assessed by the score on the Post Anesthesia Care Unit Survey of Modified Time Principle Induction
Time Frame: within 24 hours after surgery
|
This is scored from 0(no pain) to 10(worst pain)
|
within 24 hours after surgery
|
Number of participants who had nausea as assessed by the score on the Post Anesthesia Care Unit Survey of Modified Time Principle Induction
Time Frame: within 24 hours after surgery
|
within 24 hours after surgery
|
|
Number of participants who had vomiting as assessed by the score on the Post Anesthesia Care Unit Survey of Modified Time Principle Induction
Time Frame: within 24 hours after surgery
|
within 24 hours after surgery
|
|
Overall patient satisfaction as assessed by the score on the Post Anesthesia Care Unit Survey of Modified Time Principle Induction
Time Frame: within 24 hours after surgery
|
This is scored from 0(not satisfied) to 10(extremely satisfied)
|
within 24 hours after surgery
|
Number of participants who had recollection of pain on induction
Time Frame: within 24 hours after surgery
|
within 24 hours after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lauren M Nakazawa, MD,MBA, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 13, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 12, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 12, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 31, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
September 8, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
December 1, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 27, 2023
Last Verified
November 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-23-0468
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anesthesia
-
Samsun UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Regional Anesthesia | Anesthesia ManagementTurkey
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectGermany
-
Novocol Pharmaceutical of Canada, Inc.CompletedAnesthesia, Local | Dental Anesthesia | Anesthesia, ReversalUnited States
-
Aligarh Muslim UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectIndia
-
Universitas Sebelas MaretIndonesia Endowment Fund for EducationNot yet recruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; Reaction
-
University of PecsCompleted
-
Hormozgan University of Medical SciencesUnknownAnesthesia | Anesthesia; FunctionalIran, Islamic Republic of
-
University of ChicagoRecruitingAnesthesia | Patient Satisfaction | Anesthesia Risks | Anesthesia Consent | Consent RetentionUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisINSERM UMR-942, Paris, France; M3DISIMNot yet recruitingPrediction Models for Cardiovascular and Neurocognitive Disease Risk in the General Population (CME)Anesthesia, Local | AnesthesiaFrance
-
Matthew BorzageRecruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; ReactionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Modified Time Principle Induction (MTPI) with rocuronium
-
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRecruitingRectal Carcinoma | Locally Advanced Malignant NeoplasmFrance
-
Terry L. WahlsRecruitingMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterPfizer; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of Pittsburgh; University of VirginiaCompletedNeurofibromatosis | Meningioma | CNS Cancer | Hemangioblastoma | Intracranial HemangiopericytomaUnited States