Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients

December 5, 2023 updated by: David J. Taber, Medical University of South Carolina

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Tolerability and Efficacy of Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients

The purpose of this study is to find out if there is a difference in how well the standard MUSC cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention medicine works, compared to a different medicine, in preventing CMV infections in kidney transplant recipients who are at risk for this type of infection, while also assessing the tolerability of these two regimens. The two medication regimens being compared are Valganciclovir (FDA approved to prevent and treat CMV infection) vs Maribavir (FDA approved to treat CMV infection) plus Acyclovir (FDA approved to prevent HSV infection).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Maribavir has been evaluated for the prevention of CMV infection in Phase II and Phase III trials within allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. At 6-months post-transplant, the rates of CMV infection using PCR were not different between treatment and placebo arms, although the rates of pp65 antigenemia were lower in the Maribavir group. However, these studies used a low dose of 100mg PO BID. In subsequent studies within solid organ transplantation, Maribavir dosed at 400 to 1200mg PO BID was equally efficacious to valganciclovir for the treatment of CMV infection. Of note and importance to this proposal, the rates of neutropenia were 4-5% in the Maribavir treated patients vs. 15-18% in Valganciclovir patients. Thus, at an appropriate dose, Maribavir appears to have similar efficacy to Valganciclovir in treating CMV infection with a significantly reduced incidence of neutropenia. Currently, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials assessing the safety and efficacy of adequately dosed (=400mg PO BID) Maribavir for the prevention of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

Aim 1. Assess the incidence of leukopenia in those randomized to Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir prophylaxis in adult kidney transplant recipients at high-risk of CMV infection.

Hypothesis 1. The incidence of clinically meaningful leukopenia, defined as a WBC count of < 3,000 cells/mm3 and a reduction in total mycophenolate dose below 1,500 mg/day or valganciclovir dose below 900mg per day (adjusted for renal function), will be significantly lower in the Maribavir arm, as compared to the Valganciclovir arm.

Aim 2. Assess the efficacy of Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir prophylaxis in adult kidney transplant recipients at high-risk of CMV infection.

Hypothesis 2. The incidence of CMV infection and disease will be similar between the Maribavir arm, as compared to the Valganciclovir arm, at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-transplant.

Aim 3. Assess the impact of Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir prophylaxis on healthcare utilization and costs in adult kidney transplant recipients at high-risk of CMV infection.

Hypothesis 3. Healthcare utilization will be lower in the Maribavir arm, as compared to the Valganciclovir arm, at 6- and 12-months post-transplant, driven predominantly by reduced number of telephone calls, televisits, and laboratory monitoring encounters.

Exploratory Aim 4. Assess the impact of Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir prophylaxis in adult kidney transplant recipients at high-risk of CMV infection on patient-reported outcomes for quality of life and satisfaction.

Exploratory Aim 5. Assess any differences in leukopenia, efficacy, healthcare utilization and patient reported outcomes by race and sex in patients randomized to Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir prophylaxis in adult kidney transplant recipients at high-risk of CMV infection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of South Carolina
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Kidney transplant recipient at study institution
  • =7 days of transplant
  • Received at least one dose of rATG induction or patient is D+/R- CMV serostatus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years at time of transplant
  • Recipient of pancreas, liver, heart, lung transplant
  • Recipient of investigational, non-FDA approved medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
valganciclovir 900mg once daily
valganciclovir 900mg once daily
Experimental: Intervention
maribavir 400mg twice daily
maribavir 400mg twice daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the proportion of patients that develop leukopenia in those randomized to maribavir versus those randomized to valganciclovir prophylaxis in adult kidney transplant recipients at high-risk of CMV infection.
Time Frame: One year following transplant
Leukopenia is defined as a white blood cell count <3000 cells/mm3
One year following transplant
Compare the proportion of patients that develop cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in those randomized to maribavir versus those randomized to valganciclovir prophylaxis in adult kidney transplant recipients at high-risk of CMV infection.
Time Frame: One year following transplant
CMV infection is defined as having at least one CMV DNA PCR test of >1000 copies/mL
One year following transplant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00125967

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CMV

Clinical Trials on Valganciclovir

3
Subscribe