Edentulous Maxilla Opposed by 2-implant Mandibular Overdenture?

September 21, 2023 updated by: Mansoura University

Maxillary Overdenture Retained by Different Number of Implants Opposed by 2-implant Assisted Mandibular Overdenture. A Cross-over Study of Patient Satisfaction

This within -subject study will be conducted to evaluate the proper number of unsplinted implants ;( three, four and five implants) for the edentulous maxilla opposed by mandibular two-implant overdentures.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dakahlia
      • Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35516
        • Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • o Healthy and free from any systemic diseases that may interfere with the osseointegration of implants.

    • Patients have completely edentulous maxilla for at least 6 months after last extraction with opposing mandibular two-implant Overdentures.
    • The patients have angle class I maxillomandibular skeletal relation and sufficient interarch space not less than (10-12 mm) as detected by tentative jaw relation.
    • Maxillary and mandibular alveolar ridges covered with healthy, firm, relatively even thickness and even compressible mucosa as detected by palpation with the blunt end of the mirror and free from any signs of inflammation or flabbiness as detected by clinical examination.
    • Good quality and quantity of maxillary residual alveolar ridge, as detected by CBCT, available for implant width (3.7mm, 5mm for anterior and posterior implants respectively) and length (12mm, 10mm for anterior and posterior implants respectively) this was ascertained by CBCT.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • o Any history of metabolic or systemic diseases that may affect integration of implant or connective tissue health surrounding implant.

    • History of irradiation in head-and-neck area.
    • Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day)
    • Parafunctional habits such as bruxism.
    • Psychiatric disorders or unrealistic expectations.
    • Positive pregnancy test up to 5 days before surgery.
    • Severe thrombocytopenia and bleeding disorders.
    • Pathologic condition of soft tissue (bacterial and viral stomatitis, hyperplasia, cyst, fibrous lesions)
    • Patients with local contraindications for implant placement due to localized bone defects and poor bone quality (D5).
    • Patients with TMJ disorders or poor neuromuscular coordination.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: three implant group
Maxillary overdenture retained by 3 unsplinted implants in midline and canines regions.
maxillary overdenture retained by different number of implants
Active Comparator: five implant group
Maxillary overdenture retained by 5 unsplinted implants in midline, canines and molar regions.
maxillary overdenture retained by different number of implants
Active Comparator: four implant group
Maxillary overdenture retained by 4 unsplinted implants in canines and molar regions.
maxillary overdenture retained by different number of implants

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: one year
patient satisfaction will be evaluated for all patients by a questionnaire using visual analogue scale
one year
Bite force
Time Frame: one year
Bite force will be evaluated for all patients by a digital bite force device
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 26, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 16, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A20080622

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prosthesis Durability

Clinical Trials on Maxillary implant overdenture

3
Subscribe