- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06321042
Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of the Total Knee ps Prosthesis Implanted With the Use of Inertial Sensors (SYMPHO-EM)
March 13, 2024 updated by: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of the Total Knee Prosthesis With Posterior Stabilization Implanted With the Use of Inertial Sensors
evaluate the clinical outcome of the implantation of a specific primary TKA model implanted with the aid of inertial sensors for the execution of bone cuts through the administration of questionnaires for the calculation of clinical-functional scores;
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
40
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Stefano Zaffagnini, Prof
- Phone Number: 0516366075
- Email: stefano.zaffagnini@unibo.it
Study Locations
-
-
Italia
-
Bologna, Italia, Italy
- Recruiting
- Stefano Zaffagnini
-
Contact:
- Stefano Zaffagnini, MD
- Phone Number: 051 6366075
- Email: stefano.zaffagnini@unibo.it
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
N/A
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients candidates to TKA surgery
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Male and female subjects 50 years of age or older and less than 85 years of age (>50 and <85 years) who are candidates for primary cemented total knee replacement based on physical examination and medical history, including diagnosis of severe knee pain and disability due to at least one of the following causes:
- to. Primary or secondary osteoarthritis
- b. Collagen disorders and/or avascular necrosis of femoral condyle
- c. Moderate valgus, varus or flexion deformities (HKA between ± 10°, flexion contracture <10°) -
- Patients consent and able to complete scheduled study procedures and follow-up assessments.
- Patients informed about the nature of the study who signed the "informed consent" approved by the ethics committee.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Simultaneous participation in other studies
- Patients not capable of understanding and wanting and therefore unable to sign the informed consent
- Patients who have already undergone hip or ankle arthroplasty, previous osteotomy, with severe axial deformities or suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes or neuromuscular diseases.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Patient treated with PS Link Symphoknee prosthesis and Orthokey perseus alignment device
|
Knee arthroplasty surgery with perseus orthokey alignment device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Knee Society Score
Time Frame: at baseline (day 0)
|
Two sections, one evaluating the patient's function and one for his clinical conditions, overall score goes from 0 to 100
|
at baseline (day 0)
|
Knee Society Score
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Two sections, one evaluating the patient's function and one for his clinical conditions, overall score goes from 0 to 100
|
6 months
|
Knee Society Score
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Two sections, one evaluating the patient's function and one for his clinical conditions, overall score goes from 0 to 100
|
12 months
|
Knee Society Score
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Two sections, one evaluating the patient's function and one for his clinical conditions, overall score goes from 0 to 100
|
24 months
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
Time Frame: at baseline (day 0)
|
The test evaluates main aspects of arthritis such as pain, stiffness articulation and functionality.
The score goes from 0 to 96
|
at baseline (day 0)
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The test evaluates main aspects of arthritis such as pain, stiffness articulation and functionality.
The score goes from 0 to 96
|
6 months
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The test evaluates main aspects of arthritis such as pain, stiffness articulation and functionality.
The score goes from 0 to 96
|
12 months
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The test evaluates main aspects of arthritis such as pain, stiffness articulation and functionality.
The score goes from 0 to 96
|
24 months
|
36-Item Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: at baseline (day 0)
|
is a valid and reliable tool for measuring health outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain, but its sensitivity to clinical changes in patients with specific disorders may be limited, rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 and 100 being minimum and maximum possible scores.
|
at baseline (day 0)
|
36-Item Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: 6 months
|
is a valid and reliable tool for measuring health outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain, but its sensitivity to clinical changes in patients with specific disorders may be limited, rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 and 100 being minimum and maximum possible scores.
|
6 months
|
36-Item Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: 12 months
|
is a valid and reliable tool for measuring health outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain, but its sensitivity to clinical changes in patients with specific disorders may be limited, rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 and 100 being minimum and maximum possible scores.
|
12 months
|
36-Item Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: 24 months
|
is a valid and reliable tool for measuring health outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain, but its sensitivity to clinical changes in patients with specific disorders may be limited, rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 and 100 being minimum and maximum possible scores.
|
24 months
|
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time Frame: at baseline (day 0)
|
The KOOS holds five separately scored subscales: Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL).
the score goes from 0 to 100
|
at baseline (day 0)
|
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The KOOS holds five separately scored subscales: Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL).
the score goes from 0 to 100
|
6 months
|
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The KOOS holds five separately scored subscales: Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL).
the score goes from 0 to 100
|
12 months
|
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The KOOS holds five separately scored subscales: Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL).
the score goes from 0 to 100
|
24 months
|
Forgotten joint score
Time Frame: at baseline (day 0)
|
a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint
|
at baseline (day 0)
|
Forgotten joint score
Time Frame: 6 months
|
a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint
|
6 months
|
Forgotten joint score
Time Frame: 12 months
|
a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint
|
12 months
|
Forgotten joint score
Time Frame: 24 months
|
a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Radiographic evaluation of prosthetic femoral component positioning
Time Frame: 5 days after index surgery
|
measurement of prosthetic femoral component alignment according to femoral mechanical axis
|
5 days after index surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 13, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 13, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
March 20, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 20, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 13, 2024
Last Verified
March 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SYMPHO-EM
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prosthesis Durability
-
Groupe SEBBINRecruiting
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedProsthesis DurabilityEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedProsthesis DurabilityEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedProsthesis DurabilityEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityRecruitingProsthesis DurabilityEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityActive, not recruitingComplete Digital Workflow for Construction of Full Arch Implant Supported Screw Retained RestorationProsthesis DurabilityEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Mansoura UniversityActive, not recruitingProsthesis DurabilityEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Knee arthroplasty
-
Heekin Orthopedic Research InstituteDePuy Orthopaedics; ConforMIS, Inc.; Stryker OrthopaedicsUnknown
-
Anderson Orthopaedic Research InstituteRush University Medical CenterActive, not recruiting
-
Lovisenberg Diakonale HospitalHaugesund Rheumatism HospitalRecruitingGonarthrosis; Primary | Degenerative Joint Disease of KneeNorway
-
University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenAarhus University Hospital; Bispebjerg Hospital; Vejle Hospital; Aalborg University... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingOsteoarthritis, KneeDenmark
-
Technische Universität DresdenActive, not recruiting
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteWithdrawnOsteoarthritis, KneeCanada
-
Technische Universität DresdenMathys Ltd BettlachUnknownKnee Osteoarthritis
-
Jesus Moreta SuarezActive, not recruiting
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUnknownComputer-assisted Navigation Versus Conventional Total Knee ReplacementTaiwan
-
Tian HuaRecruiting