YEARS Score vs CTPA in Pulmonary Embolism

September 28, 2023 updated by: Hussien Fayiad, Kasr El Aini Hospital

Predictive Accuracy of YEARS Score in Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

The investigators' aim in this study is to assess the sensitivity and accuracy of YEARS algorithm in the diagnosis of PE.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a relatively common acute cardiovascular disorder with high early mortality rates that, despite advances in diagnosis and treatment over the past 30 years, have not changed significantly. Due to pulmonary bed obstruction, PE can result in acute right ventricular (RV) failure. Because most patients ultimately die within the first hours of presentation, early diagnosis is of paramount importance.

The incidence of PE is estimated to be approximately 60 to 70 per 100,000, and that of venous thrombosis approximately 124 per 100,000 of the general population.

Because of its diagnostic accuracy and wide availability, multidetector row computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the imaging test of choice to confirm acute pulmonary embolism in most patients. Increasing use of CTPA with diminishing prevalence of pulmonary embolism to even less than 10% has led to overdiagnosis of mostly subsegmental pulmonary embolism and unnecessary risks of radiation exposure and contrast medium induced nephropathy.

To avoid these problems, validated diagnostic algorithms for suspected acute pulmonary embolism, using sequential testing, have been introduced. In these algorithms, a normal D-dimer test result in patients with low probability safely excludes pulmonary embolism.

YEARS scoring system is an algorithm to predict diagnosis of pulmonary embolism according to clinical signs and D-dimer. The aim of this study is to test predictive accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of YEARS score compared to CTPA in the diagnosis of PE as CTPA is an invasive procedure, expensive and not readily available in many settings, thus, finding an alternative easier method that can diagnose PE may help save the time and resources.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Giza
      • Cairo, Giza, Egypt, 222
        • Faculty of medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient more than 18 years old presenting to the emergency room with symptoms of clinically suspected pulmonary embolism such as:

    • Sudden onset of dyspnea, sudden deterioration of existing dyspnea, sudden onset of pleuritic chest pain without another apparent cause.
    • Any other symptoms like hemoptysis, syncope or unilateral leg pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy

    • Allergy to intra-venous contrast agents
    • Renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: to assess the sensitivity and accuracy of YEARS score in the diagnosis of PE.
50 patients with suspected PE were evaluated in Chest Department at faculty of medicine, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital. At the beginning, clinical evaluation using YEARS score was done; subsequently for definitive diagnosis, computed tomography pulmonary angiography was performed in all cases as a reference method.
Exposure to CT scan and injection of IV contrast

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
YEARS score vs CTPA in diagnosis of PE
Time Frame: One year
In patients with no YEARS items and a D-dimer concentration less than 1000 ng/mL, pulmonary embolism was considered excluded and further testing was withheld. In patients with one or more YEARS items and a D-dimer concentration less than 500 ng/mL, pulmonary embolism was also considered excluded and further testing was withheld. All other patients i.e., either with no YEARS item and a D-dimer concentration of 1000 ng/mL or more, or with one or more items and a concentration of 500 ng/mL or more were referred for CTPA to show or exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Embolism

Clinical Trials on Performance of CTPA

3
Subscribe