Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Post-Stroke Fatigue

January 30, 2024 updated by: Texas Woman's University

The goal of this phase I/II clinical trial is to determine the behavioral and neural effects of 5-daily transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke fatigue. The three aims are:

Aim 1: Investigate the behavioral effect of 5 daily sessions of anodal tDCS over the ipsilesional M1 on PSF.

Aim 2: Investigate the neurophysiological effect of 5 daily sessions of anodal tDCS over the ipsilesional M1.

Aim 3: Determine the relationship between changes in M1 excitability, brain connectivity and changes in PSF.

Participants will receive either a real or sham stimulation for 5 consecutive days and fatigue will be assessed before, immediately after and 1-month after the intervention. Fatigue will be assessed using clinical, behavioral, and neurophysiological outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Up to 85% stroke survivors experience post-stroke fatigue (PSF) defined as intensified perceived effort during activities. PSF is a significant barrier to full participation in rehabilitation and negatively affects quality of life after stroke. Despite its well-known impacts, there are very few targeted interventions for PSF largely due to unclear underlying mechanisms. A few brain stimulation studies have suggested a relationship between primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and PSF. Recent clinical trials using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulate brain excitability reported mixed clinical efficacy in reducing PSF with unclear mechanisms of action.

The proposed research will address the gaps in our knowledge by determining the behavioral and neural correlates of PSF using an experimental design and multimodal approach.

Thirty-two individuals with significant fatigue due stroke will be randomly assigned to receive five consecutive sessions of anodal or sham tDCS. Before and after intervention, participants will complete clinical and behavioral assessments of PSF, brain excitability assessment using transcranial magnetic stimulation, and brain connectivity assessment using resting state functional MRI. In aim 1, the investigators will determine if upregulating M1 excitability via tDCS will reduce PSF assessed by clinical and behavioral markers. Aim 2 will utilize brain stimulation and brain imaging techniques to probe the neurophysiological effect of tDCS on PSF. Aim 3 will explore the relationship between changes in neurophysiological outcomes and changes in PSF.

The long-term goal of the team is to develop evidence based, theory-driven interventions to manage PSF. The proposed study is innovative in that it investigates a relative novel intervention to mitigate PSF and adopts a multimodal approach to examine the underlying mechanisms. The comprehensive research will guide the development of treatment targeted the underlying mechanisms of PSF. In addition to its scientific and clinical significances, the proposed research will achieve its educational goals by fostering a group of student researchers and promoting rigorous research cultures within the investigator's institute.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Hui-Ting Goh
  • Phone Number: 4697405662
  • Email: HGoh1@twu.edu

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
        • Recruiting
        • Texas Woman's University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. be at least 18 years old;
  2. have a history of unilateral stroke ≥ 3 months prior to enrollment to ensure stability;
  3. have an average score ≥ 4 on FSS;
  4. have some movement capability in the more affected arm (upper extremity Fugl-Meyer(FMUE) ≥ 28) to ensure they can perform the reaching task;
  5. be able to follow three-step commands.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. acute medical problems;
  2. the presence of any contraindication to tDCS, MRI or TMS;
  3. the presence of significant depression (score > 10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9);
  4. significant pain in the upper extremities that interferes with movements; or
  5. use of medication which may affect the level of fatigue.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Anodal tDCS group
Participants will receive anodal tDCS applied to the ipsilesional primary motor cortex.
Anodal tDCS will be delivered for 5 consecutive days. Participants will receive 2 mA of stimulation for 20 minutes with the anodal electrode placed on the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathodal electrode placed over the contralateral supraorbital area.
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS
Participants will receive sham tDCS applied to the ipsilesional primary motor cortex
Sham tDCS will be delivered for 5 consecutive days. Participants will receive sham stimulation for 20 minutes with the current intensity ramping down after 30 seconds of stimulation. The anodal electrode placed on the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathodal electrode placed over the contralateral supraorbital area.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue Severity Scale score
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
This is a 9 item questionnaire and each item is rated on a Likert scale 1-7. Participants will rate their responseS based on their previous week experience. A higher score suggests more fatigue.
This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Input-output curve slope
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Brain excitability will be indexed using the input-output curve slope acquired with single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)protocol. A greater slope value indicates a greater brain excitability.
This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Participants will rate their perceived physical effort associated with a reaching task on a scale ranging from 6 to 20. A higher rating suggests higher perceived effort.
This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Functional connectivity of the fronto-striato-thalamic network
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 2 time points during the study, at baseline and immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline).
Brain functional connectivity will be evaluated using 10-minute resting state functional MRI. A greater correlation coefficient value indicates a greater connectivity within the network.
This outcome will be assessed at 2 time points during the study, at baseline and immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline).
Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Function
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
This is a 20-item questionnaire and each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire yields one motor and one cognitive scores. A higher score indicates more fatigue.
This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Visual Analog Scale-Fatigue
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
This is a 10cm single dimension scale with a higher score indicates a higher level of fatigue.
This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Paas Mental Effort Rating Scale
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Participants will rate their perceived mental effort associated with a reaching task on a scale ranging from 1 to 9. A higher score indicates greater mental effort perceived.
This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Paired pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation measures
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Brain excitability will also be indexed using neurophysiological measures acquired with paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol. These include short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF).
This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional connectivity of other established brain networks.
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 2 time points during the study, at baseline and immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline).
Using the 10-minute resting state functional MRI data acquired, the functional connectivity of other established networks, including sensorimotor network, fronto-parietal network, and default mode network will be explored.
This outcome will be assessed at 2 time points during the study, at baseline and immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline).
Reach movement time
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Movement time (measured in seconds) will be used to index reach performance with a shorter movement time indicating a better performance.
This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Reach reaction time
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Reaction time (measured in seconds) will be used to index reach planning with a shorter reaction indicating a better performance.
This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Reach error
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Error (measured in cm) will be used to index movement accuracy with a lower error indicating a better performance.
This outcome will be assessed at 3 time points during the study, at baseline, immediately after the intervention ( an average of 7 days from baseline) and at follow-up (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-FY2023-226
  • 1R15HD109737-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • R15HD109737 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Upon publication of the manuscripts, the de-identified data generated from the project will be made available to qualified researchers outside our research team upon request.

The investigators will also deposit the de-identified data to the NICHD Data and Specimen Hub (DASH).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon the publication of the manuscripts (~12 months after study completion).

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers can contact PI via email (hgoh1@twu.edu) to request access to the de-identified data.

DASH users can request access to the de-identified data deposited to the NICH DASH.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation

3
Subscribe