Reliability and Validity Studies of Turkish Version of Manual Ability Measure-36

February 3, 2024 updated by: Gulser CINBAZ, Istanbul Medeniyet University

Reliability and Validity Studies of Turkish Version of Manual Ability Measure-36 (MAM-36)

This study aim was to investigate the validity and reliability of Turkish version of Manual Ability Measure-36 (MAM-36) in patients with neurological disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The reliability and validity of the scale were initiated by language equivalence and cultural adaptation. The MAM-36 scale was translated into Turkish by two experienced physiotherapists who are native Turkish speakers and have a good command of English, following the translation procedures. The two translations were compared with each other and a single Turkish draft was created. This draft was translated back into English by two translators who are native English speakers and have a good command of Turkish. The two back translations were compared to each other and converted into a single form. The resulting form was compared with the original form and the final back-translation scale was created. All translation formats of the scale were examined in detail by those who translated the scale into Turkish and a jury consisting of experienced physiotherapists. At the end of the meeting, the pilot study form of the scale was created. The created draft was applied to 30 healthy individuals as a pilot study. The final version of the scale was created by evaluating the feedback obtained. The clinical phase of the study was carried out on 250 volunteer individuals who applied to Dokuz Eylül University Hospital Neurology Department Polyclinics and were diagnosed with MS, Parkinson's disease, and stroke, and who had various degrees of problems in hand dexterity and functions due to their diseases. To evaluate the validity of MAM-36, Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), which can measure manual dexterity and was validated in Turkish, was used. The scales were repeated 15 days later to assess test-retest reliability.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Individuals who were diagnosed with stroke, Parkinson's or Multiple Sclerosis and had problems with manual dexterity in at least one upper extremity were included in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being diagnosed with a neurological disease (Stroke, Parkinson's or MS)
  • At least one upper extremity is affected
  • Being conscious enough to complete the survey and knowing how to read and write
  • Agreeing to participate in the research
  • Being over 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having an upper extremity operation within the last 6 months
  • Having had an attack or seizure in the last month
  • Participating in any physical therapy program during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Manual Ability Measure-36
Time Frame: baseline
Manual Ability Measure-36 was used to measure hand functions. The scale is a task- and patient-oriented measurement tool. Scale items consist of tasks that are frequently performed in daily life. In the survey where individuals subjectively evaluate their manual skills, a 4-point Likert rating scale is used, where 1 is 'I cannot do', 2 is 'very difficult', 3 is 'somewhat difficult', 4 is 'easy'. As a result of this 4-grade scoring of the scale, each patient receives a score between 0-144 from the test. However, in order to facilitate the analysis of future studies on the scale, a 100-point conversion table was created by the creators of the test.
baseline
Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand
Time Frame: baseline
Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was developed by the 'Institute of Work and Health Ontario and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons' for use in patients with upper extremity problems. DASH is a self-report scale that measures activity and participation limitations and level of disability in upper extremity disorders. The patient's symptoms and daily life activities are examined on a scale consisting of thirty questions. Grading of the scale is done with a Likert scale. For each task, the patient gives a difficulty rating between 1 and 5. These five difficulty levels are defined as 1: no difficulty, 2: mild difficulty, 3: moderate difficulty, 4: extreme difficulty, 5: not at all. A score between 0-100 (0 = no apology, 100 = maximum apology) is obtained from the scale. A high score also indicates high functional disability. The scale has a Turkish cultural adaptation.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 25, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Turkish Validity and Reliability of The MAM-36 Scale

3
Subscribe