Turkish Version of The Conceptualization of Pain Questionnaire

February 13, 2024 updated by: Ismail Saracoglu, Kutahya Health Sciences University

Validity and Relaibility of Turkish Version of The Conceptualization of Pain Questionnaire

The Conceptualization of Pain Questionnaire (COPAQ), has been presented to the literature in order to evaluate the concept of pain in children and its psychometric properties. This scale, which was developed by Salvat et al., is stated as a tool that consists of a total of 15 items and is easy to administer and respond to. The total score is calculated with the correct or incorrect answers given by the children to these items, and the higher this score, the better the child's understanding of the concept of pain. Moreover; it has been shown that the scale has good fit and internal consistency. In Turkey, there is no valid and reliable scale to evaluate the concept of pain in a child with chronic pain.

The aim of this study is to create the Turkish version of "The Conceptualization of Pain Questionnaire (COPAQ)", which evaluates the concept of pain in children with chronic pain, and to question the Turkish validity and reliability of this scale.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Chronic pain is a debilitating health problem often seen in children and adolescents. Although the prevalence rate varies between 11% and 38%, this rate increases with age (1). Clinical guidelines recommend that healthcare professionals help children with chronic pain understand their pain experience (2). Studies have shown that there is a relationship between the quality of the information children receive and their adaptation to and coping with pain (3). For this reason, studies in the field of pediatrics have turned to pain neuroscience education, which provides the reconceptualization of pain through education (3). Pain neuroscience education provides the basis for understanding the mechanisms of chronic pain by focusing on the biopsychosocial markers of pain (3). A pain neuroscience training protocol called 'PNE4Kids' specific to children has been introduced in the literature and it has been explained how this training should be applied to children (4). The effectiveness of the "PNE4Kids Program" has been investigated with new studies and it has been proven that it has a positive effect on the concept of pain in children and increases their knowledge of pain (5). However, there are very few scales evaluating the effectiveness of these treatments and especially the level of pain knowledge in children (6). Recently, a new scale, The Conceptualization of Pain Questionnaire (COPAQ), has been presented to the literature in order to evaluate the concept of pain in children and its psychometric properties. This scale, which was developed by Salvat et al (6), is stated as a tool that consists of a total of 15 items and is easy to administer and respond to. The total score is calculated with the correct or incorrect answers given by the children to these items, and the higher this score, the better the child's understanding of the concept of pain. Moreover; it has been shown that the scale has good fit and internal consistency (6). In our country, there is no valid and reliable scale to evaluate the concept of pain in a child with chronic pain. The aim of this study is to create the Turkish version of "The Conceptualization of Pain Questionnaire (COPAQ)", which evaluates the concept of pain in children with chronic pain, and to question the Turkish validity and reliability of this scale.

References

  1. King S, Chambers CT, Huguet A, et al. The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review. Pain 2011;152(12): 2729-2738.
  2. Palermo TM, et al. "Assessment and management of children with chronic pain: A position statement from the American Pain Society. Chicago, IL: Am Pain Soc" 2012.
  3. Robins H, Perron V, Heathcote LC et al. Pain neuroscience education: state of the art and application in pediatrics. Children 2016;3(4):43.
  4. Pas R, Meeus M, Malfliet A, et al. Development and feasibility testing of a Pain Neuroscience Education program for children with chronic pain: Treatment protocol. Braz J Phys Ther 2018;22(3):248-253.
  5. Rheel E, Ickmans K., Wauters A, et al. The effect of a pain educational video intervention upon child pain-related outcomes: A randomized controlled study. Eur J Pain 2021;25(10):2094-2111.
  6. Salvat I, Adillón C, Andrés E M et al. Development of the conceptualization of pain questionnaire: A measure to study how children conceptualize pain. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(7):3821.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

85

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Denizli, Turkey, 20070
        • Pamukkale University Hospitals
        • Principal Investigator:
          • İSMAİL SARAÇOĞLU, Ph.D.
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Bilge Basakci CALIK, Prof. Dr.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Esra AKIN, Msc.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Elif GÜR KABUL, Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Özge ÇANKAYA, Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Zülal TATAR, Msc.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gülşah KILBAŞ, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Selçuk YÜKSEL, Prof. Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants who refferred to Pamukkale University Rheumatology Clinic will be examined by one of the researchers (specialist in rheumatology) for inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with FMF (Familial Mediterranean Fever) according to the "Tel Hashomer" diagnostic criteria
  • Speak Turkish
  • Willing to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The presence of another systemic disease.
  • Intraarticular steroid injection or surgery in any joint in the last 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Turkish version of Conceptualization of Pain Questionnaire (COPAQ-TR
Time Frame: 10 minutes
COPAQ-TR consist of 15 items and asks respondents to respond if they believe the items/statements to be true or false, although they are allowed to respond undecided. A score of 0 is given to incorrect responses and those marked as undecided; the sum of all the correct answers gives the total score. The higher the score, the better the participant understands the concept of pain.
10 minutes
Turkish version ofPediatric Quality of Life Scale (PedsQL-TR)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) is a 23-item generic health status instrument with parent and child forms that assesses five domains of health (physical functioning, emotional functioning, psychosocial functioning, social functioning, and school functioning) in children and adolescents ages 2 to 18.
10 minutes
Turkish version of Child Health Assessment Scale (CHAQ-TR)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
CHAQ he Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) is a disease specific health instrument that measures functional ability in daily living activities.This 30-item questionnaire is thought to have advantages over other measures of physical function due to such aspects as its multidimensionality (it assesses 8 domains of physical function).
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Bilge Başakçı ÇALIK, Prof., Pamukkale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 4, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COPAQpauksbu

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Turkish validity and reliability

3
Subscribe