Active You: Walk, Dance, and Tone Your Abs to Reduce Your Risk of Diabetes

April 17, 2024 updated by: Jacob Kariuki, Emory University

A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of Walking, Dance, and Abdominal Core Workouts to Improve Adipocytokines Among Insufficiently Active Adults With Obesity

The phenomenon of physical activity (PA) avoidance in obesity has been detailed in the literature, but there is a lack of programs designed to address the root causes. In addition to common PA barriers such as lack of time, individuals with obesity face weight-related impediments, including stigma, shame, poor fitness, and low exercise self-efficacy, which reduce their engagement in PA. These impediments have been observed in white and minoritized populations. Numerous studies have suggested that individuals with obesity prefer activities that are enjoyable, less exhausting, and conveniently available in settings where they are not exposed to stigma. The studies also point to a need for programs that focus on the general health benefits of PA rather than weight loss, which although desirable, can be elusive.

Unmet weight loss expectations contribute to high dropout rates and non-adherence to the prescribed PA regimen among those with obesity. This is particularly consequential for minoritized populations including African Americans who tend to lose less weight in lifestyle interventions but achieve significant improvements in many cardiometabolic outcomes.

In this proposal, investigators present PA as a buffer against the deleterious effects of obesity, agnostic of weight loss status.

The Physical Activity for The Heart (PATH) program was intentionally designed to provide vicarious experiences for diverse individuals with obesity, by featuring their peers in body size, fitness level, and age engaging in PA.

The impact of the PATH intervention on these biomarkers will provide important insights into the mechanisms via which a combination of popular PA modalities improves cardiometabolic outcomes in the context of obesity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed research is significant because it will provide key evidence supporting the use of curated, openly sourced content to address PA barriers in obesity. Physical Activity for The Heart (PATH) intervention, which is anchored on the social cognitive theory's (SCT) premise that observing similar (i.e. body type, fitness level, age) others succeed can motivate action and help demonstrate a plan for success.

Thus proposal will examine the feasibility of using PATH in a weight-neutral context and the preliminary effects on adipocytokines that influence insulin resistance. If PATH improves PA and adipocytokines, it could provide a highly scalable tool for mitigating the risk of cardiometabolic disease, especially among those looking for weight-agnostic PA programs. The walking, dance, and abdominal core workouts to be examined in this proposal are extremely popular and abundant on YouTube, which makes it easy to access and curate content that can be tailored to individual preferences.

The highly scalable PATH program is accessible at any time in any setting and can lessen the impact of unpredictable barriers to PA such as inclement weather or pandemics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Recruiting
        • Emory University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥18 years, body mass index (BMI) ≥30kg/m2,
  • regular access to the Internet,
  • self-monitoring of PA via waist worn Actigraph during run-in (≥4 days with ≥10hrs wear time),
  • self-reported non-adherence to PA Guidelines [<150 min of moderate to vigorous physical activities (MVPA/wk)].

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy/intention to become pregnant within 12 weeks,
  • involvement in litigation related to a health issue, or a condition that requires supervised PA (e.g., stroke).
  • Individuals with a history of cerebrovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2D),
  • any affirmative response to any question in the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) will require primary care physician (PCP) clearance before enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PATH Intervention
Insufficiently active adults with obesity will be assigned to the PATH intervention.

The PATH intervention guides participants in making changes in their lifestyle and PA habits to support gradual improvement of PA. The health coach provides participants with access to the PATH website and instructions on how to use the resources included in PATH. The health coach meets remotely with each participant twice per month to develop a tailored plan geared towards increasing MVPA. After assigning the PATH level, the health coach guides each participant in selecting their weekly PA goal and helps them start slowly with a plan to establish regular exercise frequencies of 3-5 days per week.

Participants will use a combination of walking, dance, and abdominal core workouts to add at least 10 minutes of MVPA to their baseline PA every two weeks. The remote coach will encourage each participant to engage in at least 2 days of aerobic training (walking or dance sessions), and one day of abdominal core workouts.

Other Names:
  • PATH
The research team will examine diet quality and provide all study participants with educational content curated to promote diet quality. To minimize participants' burden, both the intervention and control arms will receive an email with a brief PDF addressing new diet components every 4 weeks
Participants will be asked to wear a ScanWatch tracker on their non-dominant hand for the entire duration of the study using a 24-hour wear protocol.
Other Names:
  • ScanWatch
Other: Control Group
Insufficiently active adults with obesity will be assigned to the attention control group.
The research team will examine diet quality and provide all study participants with educational content curated to promote diet quality. To minimize participants' burden, both the intervention and control arms will receive an email with a brief PDF addressing new diet components every 4 weeks
Participants will be asked to wear a ScanWatch tracker on their non-dominant hand for the entire duration of the study using a 24-hour wear protocol.
Other Names:
  • ScanWatch
Study staff will have a Zoom meeting with each control group participant where they will be advised to use the Be Active Your Way handout and to self-monitor PA using ScanWatch. Additionally, the group will be introduced to www.health.com, a jargon-free website that focuses on general health topics (e.g., dry eye) and the latest medical news (e.g., vaccines). Every 2 weeks control participants will meet on Zoom with study staff to review their progress in the study so as to keep the contact between the groups as similar as possible.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attainment of recruitment goal
Time Frame: 4 months after screening procedures start
Percentage of recruitment goal achieved within 4 months
4 months after screening procedures start
Participants' satisfaction of protocol procedures (acceptability)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Satisfaction by participants will be measured with neutral messages/content collected via an end-of-study survey on user experience.
12 weeks
Adherence to protocol procedures
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Proportion of the sample who adhere to key study procedures (e.g., regular self-monitoring of PA, attendance of coaching sessions)
12 weeks
Retention Rate in each group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Retention rate in each group at 12 weeks after enrollment
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in adiponectin and leptin
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Adiponectin is a hormone released by adipose tissue and other body tissues, which assists with insulin sensitivity and reduces inflammation. Normal ranges vary depending on sex and BMI and in general lower levels are associated with health conditions of obesity, Type 2 diabetes, and atherosclerosis. Adiponectin and leptin will be collected via dry blood spot kits. A significant increase in adiponectin and decline in leptin, and T2D risk score will indicate improved adipocytokine and cardiometabolic risk profile and vice versa.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Changes in Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
MCP-1 is one of the key chemokines that regulate the migration and infiltration of monocytes/macrophages. MCP-1 will be collected via dry blood spot kits. A significant decline in MCP-1 will indicate improved adipocytokine and cardiometabolic risk profile and vice versa.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Changes in proinflammatory cytokines
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Proinflammatory cytokines: tumor necrosis factor Alpha (TNF-α), Interleukin-1 beta (IL1β), and Interleukin-6 (IL6) will be collected via dry blood spot kits. A significant decline in TNF-α, IL1β, and IL6 will indicate improved adipocytokine and cardiometabolic risk profile and vice versa.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Changes in T2D risk score
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The calculation of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) T2D risk score includes covariates such as age, sex, family history of diabetes, history of high blood pressure (BP), body mass index, and PA regimen (total score of 0-11). Scores ≥5 should be formally screened for diabetes per ADA guidelines.
Baseline and 12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in exercise self-efficacy questionnaire (EXSE)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
EXSE Scale assesses an individual's beliefs in their ability to continue exercising on a three-time-per-week basis at moderate intensities for 40+ minutes per session in the future. For each item, participants indicate their confidence to execute the behavior on a 100-point percentage scale comprised of 10-point increments, ranging from 0% (not at all confident) to 100% (highly confident). The total strength for each measure of self-efficacy is then calculated by summing the confidence ratings and dividing by the total number of items in the scale, resulting in a maximum possible efficacy score of 100.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in exercise self-regulation
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Exercise Self-regulation involves skills for planning, organizing, and managing exercise activities. will be measured by the Exercise Goal-Setting Scale (EGS) and the Exercise Planning and Scheduling Scale (EPS). Participants will rate 10 EGS items and 10 EPS items on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (does not describe) to 5 (describes completely). Higher levels of self-regulatory skills, such as goal-setting, self-monitoring, planning, and problem-solving, may result in higher levels of PA.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in the physical activity (PA) enjoyment
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale is an 18-item scale that assesses enjoyment of physical activity by asking participants to rate "how do you feel at the moment about the physical activity you have been doing" using a 7- point bipolar Likert scale, from 1 (I enjoy it) to 7 (I hate).
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in the social support questionnaire (SSQ) score
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

SSQ has two-part answer questions. It asks to list up to 9 people who provide support that meets the criteria stated in the question. The support persons are listed by initials and relationship to the participant. Participants then rate their satisfaction (1 - very dissatisfied to 6 - very satisfied) with the support of each person stated in the first part. The support score (SSQN) is added by the average of the individual scores across the 27 items. A high score indicates more optimism about life than a low score. Low SSQ scores have a higher prevalence of negative life events and illness.

Add the total number of people for all 27 items. (Max. is 243). Divide by 27 for the average item score=SSQ Number Score or SSQN Add the total satisfaction scores for all 27 items. (Max is 162). Divide by 27 for the average item score=SSQ Satisfaction score or SSQS Average the above for the total number of family members - this results in the SSQ family score

Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in the Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale questionnaires.
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale (OEE) contains 9 statements rated by participants using a 5-point Likert scale from 1 "Strongly Disagree" to 5 "Strongly Agree". The OEE was made primarily to study older adults with low expectations of the effects of exercise.
Baseline and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00006632
  • P30DK111024 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified participant data will be made available for the main study outcomes. All the deidentified data will be available for sharing if other researchers submit a data request form that will be approved by the principal investigator (PI)

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be made available for sharing one year after the publication of the study outcomes. Start date December 2025, end date 2032

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Individual participant data will be available for sharing with researchers for secondary analysis. The request should be directed to jacob.kariuki@emory.edu. Requesters will need to sign a data access agreement. Data will be shared via OneDrive.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on PATH Intervention

3
Subscribe