Integrated Care & Patient Navigators for Latinos With Serious Mental Illness

March 12, 2024 updated by: Patrick Corrigan, Illinois Institute of Technology
The health care needs of people with serious mental illness are exacerbated by ethnic health disparities. Latinos with serious mental illness show significant health problems compared to other ethnic groups. Therefore, this project is to develop a meaningful peer-navigator program for Latinos with serious mental illness using community-based participatory research (CBPR). Investigators are currently working with seven Hispanic/Latinos with a mental illness that have formed a Consumer Research Team (CRT) that will guide this project. This project will identify and define the problem by conducting a mixed methods research thru qualitative interviews with various stakeholders defined by the investigator's CRT group. The qualitative findings will then be cross-validated in a quantitative survey by 100 Hispanic/Latinos with mental illness. This information will then be used to design an intervention using an integrated care model for Peer-Navigators. Feasibility, accessibility , acceptability and impact of the peer-navigator program will be then evaluated in a randomized control trial (RCT) with 100 Latinos with serious mental illness who will complete measures of physical health, mental health, service use and engagement at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months. Investigators expect to show physical health improvement with the greater engagement observed in the peer navigator group. Investigators expect a similar improvement in mental health and quality of life as physical health concerns are diminished.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Latinos with serious mental illnesses have an inordinately high rate of physical illness leading to a significantly shortened life. One reason is the difficulty in engaging this disenfranchised group in primary care. Integrated services through community-based outreach and care coordination are an innovative and evidence-based practice that improves physical health. Unfortunately, social determinants of health for Latinos are often a barrier to participation in integrated care. Peer navigators offer a strategy that might help members of this group. Peer navigators, in this study, are Latinos with past history of serious mental illness specially trained to help patients meet their health needs. The program will be developed through community-based participatory research (CBPR) representing a hands-on partnership between investigators and a community advisory board made up of patient partners. Given this, investigators aim to do the following. (1) Develop a peer navigator program meant to enhance the impact of already existing integrated services for Latinos with serious mental illness. (2) Using an experimental design, test the impact of peer navigators, compared to existing integrated services alone, on engagement of Latinos with serious mental illness in primary care services. This includes indices of care seeking, appointments, and satisfaction with engagement. Investigators expect these indices to be higher in the group with peer navigators. (3) Determine the comparative impact of peer navigators versus integrated-care-as-usual on subsequent health. Investigators expect to show physical health improvement with the greater engagement observed in the peer navigator group. Investigators expect a similar improvement in mental health and quality of life as physical health concerns are diminished. This proposal represents the partnership between researchers from the Center on Adherence and Self-Determination (a National Institute of Mental Health-funded Center dedicated to understanding service engagement among people with serious mental illness and their health care system) and Trilogy. Consistent with other projects, investigators will develop a Community Advisory Board to conduct CBPR and complete a mixed-methods research project to inform the peer navigator program. Based on a power-analysis, investigators will recruit 100 Latinos with serious mental illness who will complete baseline measures of physical health, mental health, service use and engagement in the previous year, quality of life, and current housing/employment status. Patients will then be randomized to an existing integrated care program for Hispanic/Latinos with mental illness with or without peer navigators for one year. Measures will be repeated at 4, 8, and 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60616
        • Illinois Institute of Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Identify ethnicity as Hispanic/Latino
  • Identify with experience with a mental illness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Must be 18 years or older
  • Have case manager they met on a regular basis (every week for the past 4 months) for physical health

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Peer Navigator Intervention
Integrated care with a peer navigator to be provided for one year, where data will be collected at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months.
Peer navigators will be Hispanics/Latinos with a mental illness in recovery who will complete and meet certification for the peer navigator training program that will be evolved out of the mixed methods process. Investigators propose the peer navigators will enhance patient engagement in integrated care which will, in turn, improve physical and mental health and wellness of patients in this group
Other Names:
  • Peer Navigator
No Intervention: Controlled
Integrated care without a peer navigator, where data will be collected at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weekly Health Appointment Measure
Time Frame: Every week for up to 52 weeks
This scale represents the total achieved appointments and total scheduled appointments. Data was collected weekly and added up per month.The minimum is 0 ( no appointments ) with no maximum (participants were not limited to the number of appointments per week).
Every week for up to 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Scale (ATSPPH)
Time Frame: Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
ATSPPH is a 29 item scale that has been used in more than 150 studies. The scale ranges from 1 (disagreement) to 4 (agreement). Higher overall scores reflect more positive attitudes towards help seeking. Subscales were summed to get the total of each scale. Total scores range from 29-116.
Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS)
Time Frame: Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
The RAS assesses five factors related to recovery from mental illness including hope and goals. The scale ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). A higher score reflects greater attitudes towards recovery. The total score range is 22-110.
Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
Medical Outcome Study (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
This a 36 item short form that is widely adopted measure of medical health outcomes in mental health services research. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range. Items in same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores. Higher scores indicate better health. In the current study, the total score it the sum of all scales scores. The total score can range from 0 to 800.
Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
Quality of Life Scale (QLS)
Time Frame: Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
The QLS is highly used in services research and comprises 6 items of various domains of independent living. The scale ranges from 1 (terrible) to 7 (delighted). The lower the score the less quality of life. The total scores range 6-42.
Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
Availability Health Service Scale (AHSS)
Time Frame: Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
The scale measures the availability of health services. The scale ranges from 1 (Not at all) to 9 (Very much). The lower the score the less availability of a service. Items were summed to get the total of each scale. Score totals range from 26-234.
Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
Texas Christian University Health Form- Physical Health Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
Assesses physical health in the last 4 months and Emotional/Mental Health in the last 30 days.The scale ranges from 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time). The higher the score, the more health problems. Score totals on the physical health scale range 14-70.
Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
Empowerment Scale (EMP)
Time Frame: Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months
This widely used scale examines multiple dimensions of perceived personal empowerment in people with serious mental illness. The scale ranges from 1 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree). The lower the score, the higher level of empowerment. The total scores range from a minimum value of 4 to a maximum value of 16.
Baseline (0), 4, 8, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patrick Corrigan, Psy.D, Illinois Institute of Technology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

June 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PCORI-AD1306-01419

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Disorders

Clinical Trials on Peer Navigator Intervention

3
Subscribe