Comparison of Off-site vs. hands-on Assistance for Trainees During ERCP

January 16, 2024 updated by: Yanglin Pan, Air Force Military Medical University, China

Comparison of Off-site vs. hands-on Assistance for Trainees During ERCP: a Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Study

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically challenging procedure. It takes time to learn the basic skill and at least 180 - 200 cases for trainees to achieve competency in ERCP. Hands-on practice in patients remains the gold standard for ERCP training. It required the trainer to stand by the trainee in the procedure room to assist. There were insufficient patients for most trainees to achieve competence until the trainee graduate. Technology-enabled health care at a distance has profound scientific potential and accordingly has been met with growing interest. We hypothesized that the trainee can be safely guided by a senior trainer off-site with the endoscopic view displayed on a screen. Using the teleguidance, the trainer can even continue to provide guidance when the trainees complete their training and return to their hospitals until they achieve the recommended clinical competency. Given the advantages of the off-site teleguidance, it could be an attractive substitute for hands-on assistance to ERCP training.

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether off-site assistance (OA group) could achieve a comparable success rate to standard hands-on assistance (HA group) with regard to the rates of successful selective biliary cannulation during ERCP training.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

754

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400010
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital Chongqing Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
        • Recruiting
        • Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 201823
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Endoscopy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital, Second Military Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 18-90 years who received ERCP
  2. Patients with native papilla

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with altered anatomy (Billroth I/II, Roux-en-Y)
  2. Type II duodenal stenosis
  3. Previously failed cannulation
  4. Chronic pancreatitis with stones in the pancreatic head
  5. Hemodynamic instability
  6. Lactating or pregnant women
  7. Inability to give written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Off-site assistance group
The trainer supervised the trainee's cannulation operation outside the procedure room through a high-definition screen displaying the endoscopic view. Trainees wear headphones, and trainers use intercom to provide the unlimited verbal instructions. The trainer was not allowed into the procedure room and touched the endoscope or accessories until the trainee ask for help or failed to achieve deep biliary cannulation. Then the trainer would then take over and continue with the cannulation. The trainer would halt and correct the trainee's inappropriate maneuvers immediately to avoid unnecessary papillary trauma and potential complications.
The senior trainer guides the trainees during ERCP procedure outside the operating room using communication equipment and the screen displaying an endoscopic view.
Active Comparator: Hands-on assistance group
During trainees' attempted cannulation, the trainer gave unlimited verbal instructions with hands-on assistance limited to only adjustment of scope position if necessary. To avoid unintended cannulation, the trainer was not allowed to touch the control section of the scope or the sphincterotome used for cannulation. However, the trainer would correct any inappropriate maneuvers immediately to avoid unnecessary papillary trauma and potential complications. The trainees could ask for help or stop cannulation at any time if they were not comfortable continuing the procedure. The trainer would then take over and continue with the cannulation.
The senior trainer guides the trainees during ERCP procedure outside the operating room using communication equipment and the screen displaying an endoscopic view.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of successful biliary cannulation
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The percentage of trainee successfully biliary cannulation
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cannulation time
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Competency score from the trainer and endoscopic video
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Incidences of PEP and other adverse events
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
Ionizing radiation time
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KY20232429

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ERCP Training

Clinical Trials on The assistance type during ERCP

Subscribe