The Comparison of Pilates with Cognitive Functional Therapy in Adults with Chronic Neck Pain

February 27, 2025 updated by: Evi Lazoura, European University Cyprus

The Comparison of Pilates with Cognitive Functional Therapy in Adults with Chronic Neck Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Pilates compared with Cognitive Functional Therapy in adults with chronic neck pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Firstly, people being informed about the study and those who determine eligibility criteria they written informer consent. After this, the participants will be randomized by a single-blind assessor in a 1:1 ration to pilates exercises and cognitive functional therapy. The participants of both groups will receive therapy twice a week for eight weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nicosia, Cyprus
        • Evi Lazoura

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-64
  • Pain in neck area for more than 3 months
  • Pain in NPRS more than 40/100
  • Independently mobility (with or without aid), to be capable of participating in a rehabilitation program twice a week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious psychological pathology
  • Recently surgery on shoulder or neck area (<6 months)
  • Pain relieving procedures such as injection based therapy and day case procedures (e.g. rhizotomy) in the last 3 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Rheumatologic/inflammatory disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, lupus, Scheuermann's disease)
  • Progressive neurological disease (e.g. Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, Motor Neuron Disease)
  • Unstable Cardiac Conditions
  • Red flags disorders (malignancy/cancer, acute traumas like fracture (<6 months ago) or infection, spinal cord compression/cauda equina)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pilates Group
In the first session participants will received the 6 basic principles of the technique. All the other sessions will last 50 minutes and consist of warm-up, main program and cool-down exercises. The degree of difficulty of the exercises of the main part will progress every 2 weeks.
The application of pilates aims to correct real-time deviations observed in the body during movement, to maintain stability, to maintain stability, to gradually form proper sensorimotor ability and improve cervical dysfunction. Pilates is an important part but also a primary point in the stages of rehabilitation, since through it the execution of movement is encouraged earlier thus providing help for the later stages of rehabilitation. Pilates exercises concern movements at all levels of body movement and in various positions.
Other Names:
  • pilates exercises
Experimental: Cognitive Functional Therapy
In this group the participants will receive personalized treatment and therefore the sessions will be done individually for each one. All interventions will include a) a cognitive component, b) specific functional training and c) lifestylwe changes
Cognitive component: Educating patients about their perceptions of pain, explaining diagnosis and diagnostic findings, answering questions about their problem and symptoms, progressively challenge their customers in a non-judgmental way, education for multifactorial and biopsychosocial spectrum of pain, encouraging participants to movement and for active participation in daily activities, if receiving a self-management plan participation in activities with a degree of difficulty 2-3/10, tips for more effective sleep Specific functional training: Understanding pain modification through relaxation exercises, awareness and body control, modified body positions for better control of the cervical spine with parallel relaxation of the thoracic spine to participate in fearful or painful activities, engaging in movements of daily activities Lifestyle changes: Gradual increase in physical activity based on patient preferences, stress management and social interaction
Other Names:
  • CFT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
Measured pain intensity with 0 (no pain) and 100 (the worst pain ever).
baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
This questionnaire informed us about the affection to have the neck pain in human ability to manage it in everyday life. Measured neck disability with 4 (absence of disability) and >35 (full disability).
baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
This questionnaire informed us how a patient's fear avoidance beliefs about physical activity and work may affect and contribute to their cervical pain and resulting disability, with 96 (high levels of patient fear) and 0 (absence of patient fear).
baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
Short Form 12
Time Frame: baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
This questionnaire assessed the impact of health on an individual's everyday life, with 0-42 indicates the possible existence of clinical depression and <42 indicates good psychological as well as physical functioning.
baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
EuroQol (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
An EQ-5D health state is the state of responses to the 5 dimensions of EQ-5D as completed by a patient, with 0 (the worst imaginable health state) and 100 (the best imaginable health state)
baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
Range of Motion
Time Frame: baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
Range of motion in all cervical movements (flexion, extension, side flexion, rotations)
baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
Isometric Strength
Time Frame: baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization
Strength in all cervical movements (flexion, extension, side flexion, rotations)
baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Evi Lazoura, PhD (cand), European University Cyprus

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ΕΕΒΚ/ΕΠ/2023/20

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Pilates

Subscribe