Empowering Hispanic Patients' Lung Cancer Screening Uptake (Empower Latinx)

February 22, 2024 updated by: Gelareh Sadigh, University of California, Irvine

The Hispanic/Latinx community (hereafter Hispanic) is the country's second-largest racial/ethnic group, accounting for 19.1% of the total population. However, they remain one of the most underserved populations with suboptimal access to healthcare and screening services due to low income, lack of health insurance, perceived discrimination, language barriers, and limited health literacy. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related mortality with 1.8 million annual deaths worldwide, with Hispanic patients known to have lower survival rates compared with non-Hispanic whites. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) decreases this mortality rate of lung cancer by 20%. Yet many Latinx patients who are eligible for lung cancer screening are still falling through the cracks which prevents patients the ability to detect lung cancer early. This study will test and compare the effect of a multi-level intervention on ordering LDCT within 4 months after patient enrollment to those in an Enhanced Usual Care. Our proposed intervention includes:

  • Primary care provider notifications of patients' LCS eligibility;
  • Patients' education;
  • Patients' referral to financial navigation resources;
  • Patients' reminder to discuss LCS during primary care provider (PCP) visit.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Gelareh Sadigh, MD
  • Phone Number: 949-745-5066
  • Email: GSADIGH@UCI.EDU

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • Anaheim, California, United States, 92801
        • Recruiting
        • UCI Health Family Health Center - Anaheim
        • Contact:
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Recruiting
        • UCI Health SeniorHealth Center -Pavillion 4
        • Contact:
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
      • Santa Ana, California, United States, 92701
        • Recruiting
        • UCI Health Family Health Center - Santa Ana
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 50- 80 years of age.
  • Be able to speak English and Spanish
  • Must have a scheduled appointment with their Primary Care Providers within next one to three months.
  • The Scheduled PCP appointment is at any of the 4 University of California Irvine Health (UCI Health) primary care clinics in Orange County including two UCI federally qualified health centers
  • History of 20-pack year smoking history ( based on survey self-report)
  • Current smoker or a former smoker who has quit smoking within the last 15 years (based on survey self-report)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of lung cancer
  • Chest CT for any reason in the last 12 months based on self-report and UCI EMR
  • History of Alzheimer's disease or dementia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A: Enhanced Usual Care
Usual Care + Brief Educational Material
The usual care includes a provider flag in electronic medical record (EMR) on patients' eligibility for LCS if their smoking history is complete.
Brief one-page education material on lung cancer screening benefits and risk
Experimental: Arm B: Empower Latinx
  • PCP notifications of patients' LCS eligibility (addressing provider time constraints and barrier in identifying eligible patients);
  • Patients' education (addressing knowledge barriers);
  • Patients' referral to financial navigation resources (addressing health-related social risks)
  • Patients' reminder to discuss LCS during PCP visit.
Patients will be sent information (in preferred language) on lung cancer risk, lung cancer screening (LCS) benefits, harms, false positive rates, recommendations of follow-up for positive results, and exam insurance coverage.
Patients who self-report needing help with health-related social risks at baseline will be sent a brochure (in preferred language) from patient advocate foundation (PAF), a national non-profit financial navigation organization, where patients can self-refer.
The usual care includes a provider flag in electronic medical record (EMR) on patients' eligibility for LCS if their smoking history is complete.
within 2 weeks prior to appointment, patients will receive a text message or a phone call (if not having a phone that receives text messaging) encouraging patients to discuss lung cancer screening with their provider.
Within 2 weeks prior to primary care appointment, providers will be notified of their patient's eligibility for lung cancer screening and their reported barriers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of participants with order of Low-dose CT (LDCT) for lung cancer screening (LCS)
Time Frame: Within 4 months of randomization
Within 4 months of randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants who received LDCT for LCS
Time Frame: Within 4 months of randomization
Within 4 months of randomization
Number of Participants with the documented discussion of lung cancer screening with their providers in the electronic medical record
Time Frame: Within 4 months of randomization
Within 4 months of randomization
Patients' perceived risk of lung cancer
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months after randomization
3-item perceived risk of lung cancer questionnaire developed by Carter Harris et al (Cancer Nurs, 2018) will be used. The responses for each item will be based on a 5-point likert scale. A sum score will be calculated based on responses to all 3 item. Score will range between 3 and 15. Higher score= higher perceived risk.
Baseline and 4 months after randomization
Patients' perceived severity of lung cancer
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months after randomization
5-items about the health consequences and severity of lung cancer will be used. The responses for each item will be based on a 5-point likert scale. A sum score will be calculated based on responses to all items. Score will range between 5-25. Higher score= higher perceived benefits.
Baseline and 4 months after randomization
Patients' perceived benefits of lung cancer screening
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months after randomization
6-item perceived benefit of lung cancer questionnaire developed by Carter Harris et al (Cancer Nurs, 2018) will be used. The responses for each item will be based on a 5-point likert scale. A sum score will be calculated based on responses to all items. Score will range between 6-30. Higher score= higher perceived benefits.
Baseline and 4 months after randomization
Patients' perceived barriers of lung cancer screening
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months after randomization
19-item perceived barriers of lung cancer questionnaire will be used. 17 of these items were developed by Carter Harris et al (Cancer Nurs, 2018). The responses for each item will be based on a 5-point likert scale. A sum score will be calculated based on responses to all 17 validated items. Score will range between 17 and 85. Higher score= higher perceived barriers. An additional score including all 19 items will also be calculated.
Baseline and 4 months after randomization
Patients' self-efficacy of lung cancer screening
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months after randomization
10-item self-efficacy for lung cancer screening questionnaire will be used. 9 of these items were developed by Carter Harris et al (Cancer Nurs, 2018). The responses for each item will be based on a 5-point likert scale. A sum score will be calculated based on responses to all 9 validated item. Score will range between 9 and 45. Higher score= higher self-efficacy. An additional score including all 10 items will also be calculated.
Baseline and 4 months after randomization
Patients' knowledge about lung cancer screening
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months after randomization
9 questions adopted and modified from Volk R et al (PMID: 24518006) will be used. Responses will be based on true, false, unsure. Sum of correctly responded questions will be calculated. Higher score= higher knowledge.
Baseline and 4 months after randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients' experience with intervention
Time Frame: Within 6 months after completion of the follow-ups
Patient experience with intervention components will be assessed through qualitative interview of a subset of patients in Arm B (Empower Latinx). The results will be qualitatively described.
Within 6 months after completion of the follow-ups
Providers experience with intervention
Time Frame: Within 3 months after last patient completion of follow-up
Provider experience with intervention components will be assessed through qualitative interview of a subset of providers taking care of patients in Arm B (Empower Latinx). The results will be qualitatively described.
Within 3 months after last patient completion of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gelareh Sadigh, MD, University of California, Irvine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4471.
  • UCI 23-219 (Other Identifier: CFCCC)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Patient education

3
Subscribe