Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Children - a 2-8 Years Follow-up Study (MPFL)

February 13, 2024 updated by: Martin Lind, Aarhus University Hospital

The purpose of this project is to investigate the treatment outcome after MPFL reconstruction in children as a treatment for chronic patellar instability, where the superficial part of the quadriceps tendon is fixed to the femur with anchors.

The outcome will be compared with a healthy cohort matched on age and gender.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lateral patella dislocation (PL) is defined as a total dislocation of the patella out of the trochlea.

In chronic patella instability, where the patella has been repeatedly dislocated, the treatment is most often surgical. The main ligamentous structure that stabilizes the patella against lateralization is the medial patello-femoral ligament (MPFL). The MPFL is a centimeter-thin ligamentous structure that runs from the upper medial patellar border to the medial femoral epicondyle. This ligament is torn in more than 90% of cases of PL and healing of the ligament is often insufficient, especially if there are predisposing factors in the knee joint such as dysplasia of the patello-femoral joint, high standing patella (patella alta) and hypermobility.

MPFL reconstruction (MPFL-r) can be performed with many different surgical techniques, but the basic principle is to use autologous tendon tissue to create a new MPFL by anchoring the new tendon tissue to the medial patellar border and the medial femoral epicondyle, while ensuring isometry of the reconstruction.

A number of different methods have been described for anchoring the new MPFL to the patella and femoral condyle.

The most commonly used type of graft for MPFL-r is the gracilis tendon, which is fixed with screws in the femur bone preceded by drilling a channel in the femoral condyle.

In non-grown patients, the growth zone of the distal femur is very close to the anatomical attachment of the MPFL. This poses a problem as a reaming that hits the growth zone carries a theoretical risk of compromising growth around the knee.

In addition, up to 50% of patients describe pain at 1 year after surgery if screw fixation is used in the medial femoral condyle.

A new MPFL-r method using a superficial portion of the quadriceps tendon fixed with an anchor provides a good 2-year result compared to gracilis tendon and screw fixation.

The effectiveness and long-term efficacy of MPFL surgery with the quadriceps tendon for children is not well described in the literature.

At the Department of Sports Traumatology in Aarhus, Denmark, the quadriceps technique has been used on non-adult patients since 2016.

In this study, the investigators want to include the 80 patients who have undergone this MPFL-r since 2016 with the quadriceps tendon technique and have a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. This patient group will compared to a healthy cohort matched on age and gender.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Torsten G Nielsen, MHSc
  • Phone Number: +4540491184
  • Email: torsne@rm.dk

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Division of Sports Trauma, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who have undergone MPFL quadriceps surgery as children in the period 2016-2022 at Aarhus University Hospital and have more than 2 years of follow-up. The patients will be 14-23 years old at the time of referral.

Description

Inclusion Criteria - Intervention group:

  • MPFL-reconstruction with Quadriceps tendon graft
  • Open physis at surgery date
  • Minimum 2 years Follow up

Exclusion Criteria - Intervention group:

  • More surgeries in index knee
  • MPFL-r in opposite knee
  • MPFL revision in index knee

Inclusion Criteria - Healthy group:

  • No knee problems

Exclusion Criteria - Healthy group

  • None
  • No knee problems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
MPFL reconstruction with quadriceps graft
Children with medial patellofemoral reconstruction operated with epiphyses sparing quadriceps technique from 2016-2022.
Children with patella dislocations are operated from 2016-2022 with a quadriceps knee cap stabilization technique.
Healthy Cohort
A healthy cohort matched on age (+/- 2 years) and gender

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kujala (Anterior Knee Pain Scale)
Time Frame: 24 month
Patient reported outcome score, 0=worst and 100=best
24 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Donor site morbidity score, 0=worst and 100=best
Time Frame: 24 month
Patient reported outcome score
24 month
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-pain score)
Time Frame: 24 month
Patient reported outcome score, 0=Best and 10=worst
24 month
Tegner (Activity Score)
Time Frame: 24 month
Patient reported outcome score, 0=worst and 10=best
24 month
Knee pain
Time Frame: 24 month
Palpatory pain in relation to graft fixation in femur on a four-point likert scale (0=no pain, 1=mild pain, 2=moderate pain, 4=severe pain)
24 month
One-legged single hop for distance
Time Frame: 24 month
Physical performance test
24 month
One-legged triple hop for distance
Time Frame: 24 month
Physical performance test
24 month
Side-to-side hop test
Time Frame: 24 month
Physical performance test
24 month
Quadriceps Strength test
Time Frame: 24 month
Physical performance test. Hand held dynamometry
24 month
Gluteus Medius Strength test
Time Frame: 24 month
Physical performance test. Hand held dynamometry
24 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Danish EC: 1-10-72-299-21

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medial Patellofemoral Dislocation

Clinical Trials on MPFL-reconstruction

3
Subscribe