Users of Remote Conferencing and Compression of Sound Dynamics : Auditory Effects (COMPRESSED)

February 28, 2025 updated by: Institut Pasteur

The COMPRESSED project is a descriptive, bi-centric and non-invasive study carried out by the CERIAH - IDA - Institut Pasteur and the Haute École Léonard de Vinci in Brussels on volunteer participants identified in two groups :

  • be subject to high exposure to compressed sound, as defined by professional participation in events on broadcast platforms using sound signal processing systems, over the last 3 years,
  • be subject to moderate or limited exposure to compressed and manipulated sound, equivalent to that of a student following certain distance learning courses. on a videoconferencing platform, alternating with other face-to-face courses, with the ability to listen during breaks, which have been taught for a maximum of 2 years.

The main objective of the COMPRESSED study is to evaluate the auditory effects of exposure to manipulated sounds (compression, filtering, equalisation, accentuation, etc.) from sound distribution platforms on the auditory system of participants who are regularly exposed to these sounds as a result of their professional activity.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Paul Avan, MD
  • Phone Number: +33 (0)1 76 53 50 94
  • Email: paul.avan@uca.fr

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bruxelles, Belgium
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Haute Ecole Léonard De Vinci
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Recruiting
        • CEntre de Recherche et d'Innovation en Audiologie Humaine
        • Contact:
          • Paul Avan, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects with sustained exposure to compressed sounds, as defined by professional participation in broadcast platform events using sound signal processing systems, over the last 3 years, Or Subjects with moderate or limited exposure to compressed and manipulated sound, equivalent to that of a student taking distance-learning courses on a videoconferencing platform, alternating with other face-to-face courses, with the possibility of pauses in listening, exposed for a maximum of 2 years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For all participants:

  • Age 18 or over,
  • Work with platforms using sound signal processing systems,
  • Fluent in English,
  • Fluent in French,
  • Declare that they have no hearing loss.

For participants in the high exposure group:

- Have had a professional activity over the last three years using broadcasting platforms with sound signal processing systems,

For participants in the moderate or limited exposure group:

- Have worked between one semester and two years with platforms using sound signal processing systems.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conductive or mixed hearing loss, i.e. where the hearing loss affects both the outer and/or middle ear and the inner ear.
  • Have an asymmetric hearing loss, i.e. a difference in average hearing loss between the left and right ear of more than 20 dB,
  • Have a history of otitis and/or an ENT disease that permanently affects hearing (vestibular schwannoma, Ménière's disease, sudden or fluctuating deafness, congenital hypoacusis),
  • Not fluent in English
  • Be under guardianship,
  • Deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, or subject to legal protection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
High exposure to compressed sound
Video otoscopy Tympanometry High-frequency tonal audiometry
Hearing skills questionnaire Subjective assessment of tinnitus using a visual analogue scale Self-questionnaire on the impact of tinnitus Hyperacusis self-questionnaire
Acoustic Omission Measurement of the stapedial reflex by tympanometry High-frequency tonal audiometry - exposed ear only Speech audiometry in noise Tinnitus and subjective discomfort thresholds Psychoacoustic intensity perception test
A self-assessment of the sound quality of the manipulated sounds heard during the exhibition will be carried out during the second follow-up visit. The elements on which the participant will be asked to make a qualitative judgement will relate to intelligibility difficulties or not; background noise (these two items in the form of a mark between 0 and 10); the clear, muffled or shrill nature of the sounds, their resonant or saturated side.
Moderate or limited exposure to compressed sound
Video otoscopy Tympanometry High-frequency tonal audiometry
Hearing skills questionnaire Subjective assessment of tinnitus using a visual analogue scale Self-questionnaire on the impact of tinnitus Hyperacusis self-questionnaire
Acoustic Omission Measurement of the stapedial reflex by tympanometry High-frequency tonal audiometry - exposed ear only Speech audiometry in noise Tinnitus and subjective discomfort thresholds Psychoacoustic intensity perception test
A self-assessment of the sound quality of the manipulated sounds heard during the exhibition will be carried out during the second follow-up visit. The elements on which the participant will be asked to make a qualitative judgement will relate to intelligibility difficulties or not; background noise (these two items in the form of a mark between 0 and 10); the clear, muffled or shrill nature of the sounds, their resonant or saturated side.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hearing assessments of participants exposed to manipulated sounds after and before exposure
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Measurement of the difference between the hearing assessments of participants exposed to manipulated sounds after and before exposure
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Audiometric thresholds in pure tone from 125 to 8000 Hz in the subject's exposed ear before and approximately one hour after exposure,
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Measurement of the difference between audiometric thresholds in pure tone from 125 to 8000 Hz in the subject's exposed ear before and approximately one hour after exposure,
2 weeks
Difference between the threshold of the protective reflex of the auditory pathways (middle ear muscles) measured by impedancemetry in the exposed ear when a contralateral noise is presented for a few seconds.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
A contralateral noise is a low-pass filtered white noise with a cut-off at 3 kHz.
2 weeks
Levels of otoemissions in acoustic distortion products in the exposed ear in response to pure tone sound stimuli
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Comparison of the levels of otoemissions in acoustic distortion products in the exposed ear in response to pure tone sound stimuli at 65 dB SPL around 1, 2, 3 and 4 kHz, before and approximately one hour after exposure.
2 weeks
Tinnitus or auditory distortion (hyperacusis) reported by participants before and after exposure.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Measurement of the difference in the perception of tinnitus or auditory distortion (hyperacusis) reported by participants before and after exposure.
2 weeks
Effectiveness of the protective auditory reflexes (or acoustic reflexes), obtained by impedancemetry and derived from the reading of the otoemissions for each participant.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Measurement of the difference of the effectiveness of the protective auditory reflexes (or acoustic reflexes), obtained by impedancemetry and derived from the reading of the otoemissions for each participant.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Avan, MD, CeRIAH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-126
  • 2023-A00985-40 (Other Identifier: ID RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Auditory Perception

Clinical Trials on Audiological profile

Subscribe